Sources and Methods of Evaluation Sample Clauses

Sources and Methods of Evaluation. A. In preparing the annual evaluation, the person(s) responsible for evaluating the employee may consider, where appropriate, information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students, employee/self, other university officials who have responsibility for supervision of the employee, and individuals to whom the employee may be responsible in the course of a service assignment, including public school officials when an employee has a service assignment to the public schools.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sources and Methods of Evaluation. ‌ In preparing the annual evaluation, the person(s) responsible for evaluating the Faculty Member may consider, where appropriate, information from the following sources: immediate Supervisor, peers, students, Faculty Member/self, other University officials who have responsibility for supervision of the Faculty Member, and individuals to whom the Faculty Member may be responsible in the course of a service assignment, including public school officials when a Faculty Member has a service assignment to the public schools. Student Evaluations. Section 11.2(b) (Sources and Methods of Evaluation) will go into effect on the first day of the Fall 2010 Semester.
Sources and Methods of Evaluation. In preparing the annual evaluation, the person(s) responsible for evaluating the employee may consider, where appropriate, 2288 2289 information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students, employee/self, other University officials who have responsibility for supervision of the 2290 employee, and individuals to whom the employee may be responsible in the course of a 2291 service assignment. 2292 2293 (2) Observation/Visitation. The employee, if assigned teaching duties, shall be 2294 notified at least two (2) weeks in advance of the date, time, and place of any direct classroom 2295 observation or visitation made in connection with the employee's annual evaluation. If the 2296 employee determines that this date is not appropriate because of the scheduled class 2297 activities, the employee may suggest a more appropriate date. Classroom visitation 2298 without prior notice, for non-evaluative purposes, may be made with permission of the 2299 employee. 2300 (3) Employee Assistance Programs. Neither the fact of an employee's 2301 participation in an employee assistance program nor information generated by 2302 participation in the program, shall be used as evidence of a performance deficiency 2303 within the evaluation process described in this Policy, except for information relating to 2304 the employee's failure to participate in an employee assistance program consistent with 2305 the terms to which the employee and the University have agreed. 2306 2307 (4) Proficiency in Spoken English. Where applicable, employees must, to be 2308 involved in classroom instruction, be proficient in the oral use of English. No employee 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 shall be evaluated as deficient in oral English language skills unless proved deficient in accordance with the appropriate procedures and examinations established by Section 1012.93, Florida Statutes, for testing such deficiency.
Sources and Methods of Evaluation. A In preparing the annual evaluation, the person(s) responsible for evaluating the employee may consider, where appropriate, information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students, employee/self, other university officials who have responsibility for supervision of the employee, and individuals to whom the employee may be responsible in the course of a service assignment, including public school officials when an employee has a service assignment to the public schools B Observation/Visitation The employee, if assigned teaching duties, shall be notified at least two (2) weeks in advance of the date, time, and place of any direct classroom observation or visitation made in connection with the employee’s annual evaluation If the employee determines that this date is not appropriate because of the scheduled class activities, the employee may suggest a more appropriate date Alternatively, if such classroom observation or visitation will be made, the employee shall be notified at least two (2) weeks in advance of the period (for example, a semester) over which no less than two (2) observations will be made
Sources and Methods of Evaluation. (a) Each department Chairperson, or comparable administrator in an academic unit who is responsible for an employee’s annual assignment, shall also be responsible for evaluating the employee.
Sources and Methods of Evaluation. In preparing the annual evaluation, the person(s) responsible for evaluating the employee may consider, where appropriate, 2288 2289 information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students, employee/self, other University officials who have responsibility for supervision of the 2290 employee, and individuals to whom the employee may be responsible in the course of a 2291 service assignment. 2292 2293 (2) Observation/Visitation. The employee, if assigned teaching duties, shall be 2294 notified at least two (2) weeks in advance of the date, time, and place of any direct classroom 2295 observation or visitation made in connection with the employee's annual evaluation. If the 2296 employee determines that this date is not appropriate because of the scheduled class 2297 activities, the employee may suggest a more appropriate date. Classroom visitation 2298 without prior notice, for non-evaluative purposes, may be made with permission of the
Sources and Methods of Evaluation. (a) Each employee shall prepare an annual activity report.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Sources and Methods of Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.