Settlement Risk. A failure in settling a Transaction may arise from counterparty default, operational problems, market liquidity constraints and other factors and, accordingly, parties to settlement of such Transaction normally assume full and unsecured risk with regard to counterparty exposure. If there is a failure to settle any Transaction, this may have a material adverse impact on the value of such Transaction and you may lose some or all of your investment in such Transaction.
Settlement Risk. BPPR shall not be responsible for the systemic risk of loss of the Associations or the failure of the Associations to effect settlement of Transactions or to perform its obligations hereunder in the event of such failure; provided that this Section 3.8 shall not relieve BPPR of its obligations in the settlement process once the funds or information is received from the Associations.
Settlement Risk. Bank shall not be responsible for the systemic risk of loss associated with the Card Associations or the failure of Card Associations to effect settlement of transactions or to perform its obligations hereunder in the event of such failure; provided that this Section 3.6 shall not relieve Bank of its obligations in the settlement process once the funds or information is received from the Card Association.
Settlement Risk. This is the risk of a loss being incurred by the AIF because a transaction that has been con- cluded is not executed as expected because a counterparty fails to pay or deliver or because operational errors occur in the execution of the transaction.
Settlement Risk. Where the Notes provide for physical delivery, the Determination Agent may determine that a Settlement Disruption Event is subsisting. Any such determination may affect the value of the Notes and/or may delay settlement in respect of the Notes. In the case of Physical Delivery Certificates of Physical Delivery Warrants, if a Settlement Disruption Event occurs or exists on the Settlement Date, settlement will be postponed until the next Settlement Business Day on which no Settlement Disruption Event occurs. The relevant Issuer in these circumstances also has the right to pay the Disruption Cash Settlement Price (as defined in the relevant Conditions) in lieu of delivering the Entitlement. Such a determination may have an adverse effect on the value of the relevant Certificates or Warrants, as the case may be. Certain Factors Affecting the Value and Trading Price of Securities Generally, Securities offer investment diversification opportunities, but also pose some additional risks with regard to interim value. The interim value of the Securities varies with the price and/or level of the Reference Item and is affected by a number of other factors, including but not limited to:
Settlement Risk. Upon purchasing the Units, you assume settlement risks relating to the Issuer failing to deliver the Delivery Assets. The Issuer believes this risk is remote however a delay in delivering the Delivery Parcel and/or Sale Monies could occur. Compounding of risks An investment in the Units involves risks and should only be made after assessing the direction, timing and magnitude of potential future changes in the value of the Reference Asset, and the terms and conditions of the Units as contained in the PDS. More than one risk factor may have simultaneous effects with regard to the Units such that the effect of a particular risk factor may not be predictable. In addition, more than one risk factor may have a compounding effect which may not be predictable. No assurance can be given as to the effect that any combination of risk factors may have on the value of the Units.
Settlement Risk. There is a risk caused by the difference of time zones in different continents. Spot Contracts may be transacted at different prices at different times during the trading day. Payment may be made to a party that will declare insolvency or be declared insolvent, prior to that party executing its own payments.
Settlement Risk. Arises where the settlement of a transaction has not been completed at the scheduled time. Leverage risk This risk exists primarily in transactions on derivative financial instruments where the amount of security margin required to open a position is low in relation to the total value of the contract, and therefore a small change in the contract value may cause a proportionately much greater impact on the capital invested and/or required to be invested in order to retain a position. Leverage, when operating negatively for the client, may even lead to a complete loss of the capital paid by the client for opening and maintaining said position. Concentration risk Where there are no restrictions on investment categories, markets and methods, it is likely that specialized strategies that concentrate investments in specific categories, sectors or geographical areas will be pursued.
Settlement Risk. In case of emergency, market factors, or holidays of the foreign stocks/ETFs settling and clearing institutions’ locations or their counterparts, the inability to settle or the delay of settlement may occur.
Settlement Risk. 2.11.1 The procedures for the transfer of ownership of securities in some emerging markets may differ significantly from those in developed markets. Registration of shares may not be subject to standardised procedures or a centralised system and may be effected on an ad hoc basis. The concept of nominee ownership can be underdeveloped and, in some cases, not recognised at all. As a result, registration can be administratively cumbersome and time consuming, leading to delays in settling trades, ownership disputes and trading constraints.
