Settled. The Parties sign a written Settlement Agreement;
Settled. 2. Golden Books Publishing Co., Inc. v. Jostens Learning Corp., et al., USDC Case No. 96-C-0491 (Eastern District of Wisconsin).
Settled. 3. See also matters disclosed under "Material Opposition to Company Trademarks" in this schedule. SCHEDULE 4.08 (CONT'D) CURRENT INFRINGEMENT OF COMPANY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Settled. This agreement is made and entered into as of the grant date indicated below (the “Grant Date“), by and between SUPERVALU INC. (the “Company”), and the individual whose name appears below (“Recipient”). The Company has established the 2012 Stock Plan (the “Plan”), under which key employees of the Company and its Affiliates may be granted Awards of Restricted Stock Units. Recipient has been selected by the Company to receive an Award of Restricted Stock Units subject to the provisions of this agreement. Capitalized terms that are used in this agreement, that are not defined, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. In consideration of the foregoing, the Company and Recipient hereby agree as follows:
Settled. The fees and disbursements of the Sellers incurred in connection with the Notice of Disagreement shall be borne by the Sellers, and the fees and disbursements of Buyer in connection with the preparation of the Deferred Consideration Statement shall be borne by Buyer.
Settled orno j Level 1 I Not satisfied response wllhln 15 days send copla• or •t::eveJ 1 paperwork end new appeal Level 2 ll ,P.p?eal lo suporlntendent daslgnoo 111 wriling wllhln 10 days of response, lime lapse wilh no response Nol satisfied or no response within 7 days eppael to superintendenl Send copies or level 1 and 2 paperwork. Cen requesl conrerence wilhino7 days of Leval 2 appeal Superinlendenl designee decision within 10 days or Sclllcd eppeal mayobe Conference ,-----.. ,------..-·"1, J requesled days or I "_Level 3 wilhin 10 Superintendent give his/her has 20 days to receipl of level 3 form decision Sutilad APPENDIX F Evaluatee's Name: MADERA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION Evaluation Category Note specific standard(s)/subcategory(ies) (i.e., I. C. -- see attached) Specific Objective (To be submitted to the Evaluator by October 1) Place an asterisk (*) if objective is changed. Attach the change. Evaluator's Comments ;(Evaluator Review by October 31) Evaluatee's Comments 1 1 , Xxx luation Objectives
Settled. “Settled” means (i) the payment by or on behalf of Cedent, GLIC or GLICNY of Reinsured Benefits, whether in the form of cash payment, deposit to a retained asset account or other settlement option; or (ii) in the event of a Contested claim for Reinsured Benefits, Reinsurer has not agreed (whether affirmatively or by default) with Cedent’s decision to Contest such claim in accordance with the terms of Section 3 of Article VI. For the avoidance of doubt, as required by Section 3 of Article VI, the failure of Reinsurer to agree with Cedent’s decision to Contest a claim as described in clause (ii) above requires Reinsurer to discharge its liability for such claim by paying to Cedent the full amount of the Reinsured Benefits that are the subject of such claim.
Settled. With respect to any Unit, that title to such Unit has been conveyed by Borrower to a retail purchaser in accordance with the terms of the applicable Contract of Sale.
Settled. Case is stayed pending timely monthly payments by Defendants pursuant to settlement agreement. Xxxxx Xxxxx v. American Apparel, Ben Geroaldo, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxx filed with City of New York Commission of Human Rights No. M-E-SO-08-1020382-E; Federal Charge No. 16F-2008-00152C June 2008 Former employee filed complaint with the City of New York Commission of Human Rights alleging discrimination and retaliation Early stages. City of New York Commission of Human Rights is still investigating. Olympics Holdings v. American Apparel Complaint filed Aug. 14, 2007 Breach of contract action for alleged damage to formerly leased premises. American Apparel denies it caused any damage to the premises beyond wear and tear. American Discovery phase. Amendment No. 7 to Credit Agreement of AAUSA, dated as of June 20, 2008, amending the SOF Agreement, among American Apparel (USA), LLC, the Facility Guarantors, and SOF Matter Date Filed Brief Description of Case Current Status Apparel has a cross-complaint against Olympic for return of it security deposit which was kept by Olympic when American Apparel vacated the premises. Xxxxx Xxxxx v. American Apparel October 2007 Claims under the Fair and Accurate Transactions Act for allegedly printing more than 5 digits of Plaintiff’s credit card and its expiration date on Plaintiff’s receipt SETTLED. Case will be dismissed with prejudice in the near future. Xxxxx Xxxxx v. American Apparel March 2008 Claims for violations of private rights of publicity and New York Civil Rights law for alleged non-permissive use of Plaintiff’s images Case is in its early phase with discovery to begin in the near future Jeneleen Xxxxx x. American Apparel June 2008 Employment discrimination and assault Case is in its early phase. American Apparel has yet to be formally served Xxxxxxxx v. American Apparel June 2008 Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act for allegedly printing expiration date on Plaintiff’s receipt Case is in its early phase. American Apparel has recently fled its answer to Plaintiff’s complaint Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx v. American Apparel May 2008. Charge of Discrimination No. E200708S1456-00-fpe/37AA810258 Dept. of Fair Employment & Housing Complaint of Discrimination. Xxxxxxx alleges that she was denied leave under the California Family Rights Act and terminated because she did not submit her leave request in a timely manner. Early stages, DFEH is still investigating. Xxxxxx v. American Apparel Retail, Inc. Filed February 15, 2008 wi...
Settled. There is an agreement to settle this issue as follows. As indicated in H1-1-1, OPG made entries for 2011 and 2012 in a total of 19 approved deferral and variance accounts in accordance with applicable OEB decisions and orders. In its Application, OPG has requested approval to clear the audited December 31, 2012 balances in all but three of its deferral and variance accounts. The three excluded accounts are the Hydroelectric Incentive Mechanism Variance Account and the Hydroelectric Surplus Baseload Generation Variance Account as well as the hydroelectric portion of, and an amount related to a Darlington refurbishment capital cost variance included in, the Capacity Refurbishment Variance Account (the “Excluded Accounts”). The nature of the amounts recorded in each of OPG’s deferral and variance accounts is described in H1-1-1 and H2-2-1. As part of clearing the account balances, OPG has sought to recover interest that has been recorded using the generic rate of interest for deferral and variance accounts prescribed by the Board for each of the accounts as described in H1-1-1. The audited actual year-end 2012 balances in all accounts of $1,274.4M are shown in H1-1-2 and are the sum of the items in line 11, Column (a) of Tables 16 and 17 in Attachment 1 of $113.8M and $1,160.6M respectively. The Parties agree that the nature or type of amounts recorded in the deferral and variance accounts as at December 31, 2012 other than the Excluded Accounts, as proposed by OPG, are appropriate subject to the following: Nuclear Liability Deferral Account - For purposes of this settlement, the Parties agreed to the removal of $1.8M13 of interest accrued on the debit balance of the account during 2011 and 2012. Therefore, the Parties accept a balance of $206.2M in the account as of December 31, 2012. In addition, the Parties agree that this account should not attract interest for the period after December 31, 2012. The Intervenors did not review the new ONFA Reference Plan, but for the purposes of settlement, assume that the amounts recorded in the account by OPG accurately reflect the total impact arising from the changes to the Reference Plan as described by OPG in its evidence in this proceeding. Xxxxx Xxxxx Net Revenues Variance Account - For purposes of this settlement, the Parties agreed to the removal of $5.5M14 of interest accrued on the debit balance of the account during 2011 and 2012, accepting a balance in the account as of December 31, 2012 of 13 See Attach...
