Sequence of Motions Sample Clauses

Sequence of Motions. (1) The Plaintiffs in Quebec and British Columbia shall not proceed with a motion to approve the Notices of Approval Hearings in the Quebec Action and BC Action unless and until the Ontario Court approves the Notice of Approval Hearings. The motions to approve the Notices of Approval Hearings may be filed in Quebec and British Columbia, but, if necessary, Quebec and BC Counsel will seek an adjournment of their hearings to permit the Ontario Court to render its decision on the approval of the Notices of Approval Hearings. The Settling Defendant may elect to waive this provision.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sequence of Motions. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx shall not proceed with a motion to the Québec Court to approve the Settlement unless and until the Ontario Court approves the Settlement. The Second Motion may be filed in the Québec Court, but, if necessary, the parties to the Québec Action will seek adjournments of the hearings to permit the Ontario Court to render its decision on the Second Motion first. The Parties may agree to waive this provision in writing.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Sequence of Motions. (1) The Main Plaintiffs and Hershey Canada agree to request that the Courts hold joint hearings to consider the motions required by section 2.2 pursuant to the Canadian Bar Association’s Canadian Judicial Protocol for the Management of Multijurisdictional Class Actions.
Sample 1Sample 2
Sequence of Motions. (1) At any time as mutually agreed to by the Plaintiffs and the Settling Defendants after this Settlement Agreement is executed, the Plaintiffs may bring motions before the Courts to request that the Courts hold joint hearings to consider any of the motions required by this Settlement Agreement pursuant to the Canadian Bar Association’s Canadian Judicial Protocol for the Management of Multijurisdictional Class Actions.
Sample 1Sample 2
Sequence of Motions. (1) The Plaintiffs in Quebec and British Columbia shall not proceed with the respective hearings of the motions to approve the Notice of Approval Hearings unless and until the Ontario Court approves the Notice of Approval Hearings. The motions to approve the Notice of Approval Hearings may be filed in Quebec and British Columbia, but, if necessary, Quebec Class Counsel and B.C. Class Counsel will seek an adjournment of their hearings to permit the Ontario Court to render its decision in respect of the approval of the Notice of Approval Hearings. The Domfoam Defendants may agree to waive this provision.
Sample 1Sample 2
Sequence of Motions. (a) The Plaintiffs in British Columbia and Quebec shall not proceed with the Approval Hearing unless and until the Ontario Court approves this Settlement Agreement. The Approval Hearing motions may be filed in British Columbia and Quebec, but BC Counsel and Quebec Counsel agree to seek any adjournment of their Approval Hearing required to permit the Ontario Court to first render its decision on the Approval Hearing before it. Asiana may agree to waive this provision.
Sample 1
Sequence of Motions. The Settling Plaintiffs in British Columbia and Quebec shall not proceed with motions to approve this Settlement Agreement in the Settling Proceedings commenced in their respective jurisdictions unless and until the Ontario Court approves this Settlement Agreement. The approval motions may be filed in British Columbia and Quebec, but British Columbia Counsel, Quebec Counsel and Desmeules agree to seek an adjournment of their approval hearings until after the Ontario Court renders its decisions on the motions for approval brought before it.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sequence of Motions. (1) The Main Plaintiffs in Quebec and British Columbia shall not proceed with a motion to certify or authorize the Quebec and BC Proceedings unless and until the Ontario Court certifies the Ontario Proceeding. The certification or authorization motions may be filed in Quebec and British Columbia, but, if necessary, Quebec and BC Counsel will seek an adjournment of their hearings to permit the Ontario Court to render its decision on the certification motion. The Settling Defendants may agree to waive this provision.
Sample 1

Related to Sequence of Motions

  • Regulatory Matters The parties will negotiate in good faith to resolve regulatory criticisms or concerns expressed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or other U.S. federal or state banking Regulators that can reasonably be addressed through a modification of the Agreement or adoption of mutually agreeable policies or procedures to prevent or resolve a Material Default described by clause (iii) of such definition, subject to applicable legal requirements including restrictions on disclosing confidential supervisory information.

  • Notifications and filings The Principal Paying Agent shall (on behalf of the Issuers) make all necessary notifications and filings as may be required from time to time in relation to the issue, purchase and redemption of Notes by all applicable laws, regulations and guidelines and, in particular but without limitation, those promulgated by, Japanese governmental or regulatory authorities, in the case of Notes denominated in Japanese Yen and the Bank of England, in the case of Notes denominated in sterling. Save as aforesaid, the relevant Issuer shall be solely responsible for ensuring that each Note to be issued or other transactions to be effected hereunder shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of any governmental or other regulatory authority and that all necessary consents and approvals of, notifications to and registrations and filings with, any such authority in connection therewith are effected, obtained and maintained in full force and effect.

  • Filing of Materials All records related to a grievance shall be filed separately from the personnel files of the employees.

  • NOTIFICATIONS AND SUBMISSION OF REPORTS Unless otherwise stated in writing after the Effective Date, all notifications and reports required under this IA shall be submitted to the following entities: OIG: Administrative and Civil Remedies Branch Office of Counsel to the Inspector General Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Xxxxx Building, Room 5527 000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 LFAC: Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, DPM 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xx. X-000 Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Email: xx.xxxxx@xxxxx.xxx Unless otherwise specified, all notifications and reports required by this IA may be made by electronic mail, overnight mail, hand delivery, or other means, provided that there is proof that such notification was received. Upon request by OIG, LFAC may be required to provide OIG with an additional copy of each notification or report required by this IA in OIG’s requested format (electronic or paper).

  • Audit Findings Vendor shall implement any required safeguards as identified by Citizens or by any audit of Vendor’s privacy and security controls.

  • Scope of Application Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the dispute settlement provisions of this Chapter shall apply with respect to the settlement of all disputes between the Parties regarding the interpretation or application of this Agreement, whenever a Party considers that the other Party has failed to carry out its obligations under this Agreement.

  • Regulatory Filings NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner shall file this Agreement (and any amendment hereto) with the appropriate Governmental Authority, if required. Any information related to studies for interconnection asserted by Developer to contain Confidential Information shall be treated in accordance with Article 22 of this Agreement and Attachment F to the ISO OATT. If the Developer has executed this Agreement, or any amendment thereto, the Developer shall reasonably cooperate with NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner with respect to such filing and to provide any information reasonably requested by NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner needed to comply with Applicable Laws and Regulations.

  • Absence of Litigation There is no action, suit, claim, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or their officers or directors in their capacity as such, that could have a Material Adverse Effect. Schedule 3(i) contains a complete list and summary description of any pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened proceeding against or affecting the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, without regard to whether it would have a Material Adverse Effect. The Company and its Subsidiaries are unaware of any facts or circumstances which might give rise to any of the foregoing.

  • Patent Prosecution and Maintenance From and after the date of this Agreement, the provisions of this Section 8 shall control the prosecution of any patent application and maintenance of any patent included within Licensed Patent Rights. TSRI shall (a) direct and control the preparation, filing and prosecution of the United States and foreign patent applications within Licensed Patent Rights (including without limitation any reissues, reexaminations, appeals to appropriate patent offices and/or courts, interferences and foreign oppositions); and (b) maintain the patents issuing therefrom; in each case, using TSRI’s Office of Patent Counsel (“OPC”) or outside patent counsel selected by TSRI and approved by Company in writing, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, and consistent with the requirements of this Section 8.1. The parties shall mutually agree in advance, on a Licensed Patent Right-by-Licensed Patent Right basis, whether TSRI’s OPC or independent counsel will be principally responsible for filing, prosecution and maintenance of a Licensed Patent Right, it being understood that if the parties agree that external patent counsel will be principally responsible, TSRI shall have the right, at its sole discretion, to utilize TSRI’s OPC in addition to (i.e., in support of and to direct) such independent counsel’s patent filing, prosecution and maintenance activities. The reasonable and documented fees and expenses with regard to the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications and maintenance of patents (including without limitation inter partes proceedings) included within Licensed Patent Rights (“Patent Costs”) shall be paid as set forth below. Company shall have full rights of consultation with TSRI and such outside patent counsel on all matters relating to Licensed Patent Rights. TSRI shall consult, and shall instruct its counsel to consult, with Company as to the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of the Licensed Patent Rights (including, without limitation, any reissues, reexaminations, appeals to appropriate patent offices and/or courts, interferences and foreign oppositions) reasonably prior to any deadline or action with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office or any foreign patent office, and shall furnish to Company copies of all relevant documents reasonably in advance of such consultation, consider in good faith Company’s comments and suggestions with regard to such preparation, filing, prosecution and/or maintenance (including without limitation any inter partes proceedings) of the patent applications and/or patents within Licensed Patent Rights, and use its reasonable efforts to implement all reasonable and timely requests made by Company; provided, however, that in the event of a disagreement between TSRI and Company on any such patent prosecution or maintenance matters, TSRI shall have final decision-making authority over all such patent matters. Company shall have the right, but not the obligation, to be present at any court or patent office proceedings relating to Licensed Patent Rights. Provided that Company is not in material breach of its obligations under this Agreement, TSRI shall not abandon any patent or patent application within the Licensed Patent Rights without Company’s prior written consent.

  • Precedence of Documents and Changes In the event of conflict, the Contract takes precedence over the Supplementary Conditions, and the Supplementary Conditions take precedence over the General Conditions. No change to the Contract Documents is effective unless notice shall have been issued by the Owner bearing the imprimatur of the Owner as follows: “By order of The Board of Public Education for the City of Savannah and the County of Chatham.” The Design Professional has no authority to amend the Contract Documents, orally or in writing, either expressly or by implication.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.