School Dist Sample Clauses

School Dist. No.127 1/2, 60 Ill.App.2d 56 (1st Dist. 1965). School District No. 151 v. ISBE, 154 Ill.App.3d 375 (1st Dist. 1987). CROSS REF.: 5:30 (Hiring Process and Criteria), 5:40 (Communicable and Chronic Infectious Disease), 5:185 (Family and Medical Leave), 5:250 (Leaves of Absence), 5:330 (Sick Days, Vacation, Holidays, and Leaves) ADOPTED: September 8, 1997 AMENDED: September 22, 2003 AMENDED: September 24, 2007

School Dist. EHLR 353:124 (OCR 1988) (district policy of giving school officials discretion in whether to administer needed medication and conditioning the provision of services required by Section 504 or IDEA on parents signing a waiver of liability is prohibited). See further discussion below in the section of this advisory discussing IDEA entitled School Placement Decisions.

School Dist. No.127 1/2, 208 N.E.2d 423 (Ill.App.1, 1965). School District No. 151 v. ISBE, 507 N.E.2d 134 (Ill.App.1, 1987). CROSS REF.: 5:30 (Hiring Process and Criteria), 5:185 (Family and Medical Leave), 5:250 (Leaves of Absence), 5:330 (Sick Days, Vacation, Holidays, and Leaves) March 2012 5:185 General Personnel Family and Medical Leave

School Dist. No.127 1/2, 208 N.E.2d 423 (Ill.App.1, 1965) 60 Ill.App.2d 56 (1st Dist. 1965). School District No. 151 v. ISBE, 507 N.E.2d 134 (Ill.App.1, 1987). 154 Ill.App.3d 375 (1st Dist. 1987). CROSS REF.: 5:30 (Hiring Process and Criteria), 5:40 (Communicable and Chronic Infectious Disease), 5:185 (Family and Medical Leave), 5:250 (Leaves of Absence), 5:330 (Sick Days, Vacation, Holidays, and Leaves) ADOPTED: April 5, 2011, May 20, 2014 REVIEWED: July 16, 2019

School Dist. 1 for exam- ple, the court held that an architecture firm was not liable in tort to the project contractors for the preparation of defec- tive plans and specifications. Due to the lack of privity, the court concluded that the architects’ performance obligations were owed solely to the school district, not to the contractors. One consequence of the privity require- ment was to force Arizona contractors to look to the owner for redress. Rather than sue the architect in tort for a defective design, for example, the general contractor would sue the owner in contract for breaching its implied warranty to provide adequate plans and specifications.2 The owner could then turn to the architect for reimbursement of damages arising out of the architect’s defective plans. The privity rule, however, was aban- doned in Xxxxxxxx Construction Co. x. Xxxxx/Xxxx/Xxxxxxxxx.3 There, the Arizona Supreme Court expressly held that the lack of privity between a contrac- tor and an architect did not bar an action against the architect for negligent design. According to the Court, the lack of privity did not per se mean that the contractor’s harm was unforeseeable to the architect. Rather, the Court found it “foreseeable in the instant case that [the general contrac- tor], hired to follow the plans and specifi- cations prepared by [the architect], would incur increased costs if those plans and specifications were in error.”4 Thus, under Xxxxxxxx, contractors in Arizona may pursue claims directly against design professionals. The court did not explicitly decide whether contractors may recover purely economic damages. Arizona Has Adopted the Economic Loss Doctrine

School Dist. EHLR 353:124 (OCR 1988) (blanket waiver of liability as condition to provision of medical services prohibited). For example, a district may not have a blanket policy or general practice that insulin or glucagon administration or other diabetes-related health care service are only going to be provided by district personnel at one school in the district, or that a child will always need to be removed from the classroom in order to receive diabetes related health care services. An IEP developed in the legally-required manner, which takes into account all of the relevant medical and education factors under the IDEA for each disabled child, is the only way to ensure that such a student receives an individualized determination of what constitutes FAPE under the IDEA and relevant state statutes.