Schedule Review Sample Clauses

Schedule Review. The contents of this Schedule will be reviewed at regular intervals (minimum 6 monthly). Any amendments must be agreed by both provider and customer.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Schedule Review. CM will establish the documented procedure for tracking the construction schedule and all updates. It is anticipated that the contractor will provide weekly updates to the schedule during the project progress meetings, however, we also understand there will be a need to participate in stand-alone scheduling meetings. In addition to the weekly update schedules, CM will require the contractor to provide look-ahead schedules in order to ascertain activities that need Xxxxxxx County and/or architect/engineer involvement. These procedures will be included in the Project Procedures Manual and will tie closely with the Master Schedule.
Schedule Review. Review and analyze contractor’s detailed construction schedule for completeness and optimization.
Schedule Review. Consultant will review the Contractor’s baseline construction schedule and submit to City for final approval. When the schedule no longer represents an accurate depiction of the work, the Consultant will discuss with City whether to request an updated schedule from the Contractor. Consultant will review and distribute Contractor’s 3-week look-ahead schedules.
Schedule Review. (a) The Authority will post schedules in the depot at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to a general picking as a result of general schedule changes. The depot Chairman or Union designated representative may discuss recommendations for changes for those schedules with the Authority’s depot representative.
Schedule Review. For Alternate (FWS or CWS) Work Schedule requests the 3 immediate supervisor shall give the employees their choice of schedules in order 4 of seniority, beginning with the oldest unadjusted service computation date, giving 5 due consideration to ensuring adequate coverage of work. If new employees enter
Schedule Review. 1. Consultant shall review and provide written comments on the Contractor’s initial schedule and, when all comments are addressed, shall accept the initial schedule. Consultant shall review regular schedule updates. Consultant shall identify when progress is not being completed in accordance with the schedule, provide updates to ISD, and communicate with the Contractor regarding action plans that are required to assure that the Contractor maintains sufficient progress.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Schedule Review. All overtime hours worked shall be logged on the overtime schedule which will be made available to all employees and the Union.
Schedule Review. Beginning April the Employer agrees to review accommodation schedules. The goal of this review would be to create regular, repeating rotations for full-time staff and regularly scheduled part-time staff. The results of the review will be presented to the Labour Management Committee prior to implementation. DATED at Ontario this LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING Between Community Living a division of SIM COMMUN SERVICES (hereinafter referred to as the “Employer”) AND: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL .on (hereinafter referred to as the “Union”) RE: The parties agree that it is to the mutual benefit of the Employer and the employee to improve the educational standards of the workforce. Accordingly, the parties agree to investigate providing a locally delivered Developmental Services Worker diploma in co- operation with Georgian College. Once the course is established all full-time and part-time bargaining unit staff that have not already completed a or equivalent will be encouraged to enrol in the program. Both full-time and part-time staff will be eligible for tuition reimbursement of fifty percent (50%) upon successful completion of an approved course. The employee shall submit a request for approval prior to enrolment in the course. Should a staff terminate their employment prior to the first year anniversary of the completion of the most recent course, they will be required to return the Employer’s portion of the tuition for any courses completed within the last days. The Employerwill make every reasonable effort to grant requests for necessary changes to an employee’s schedule to enable attendance at the course. The Employer will endeavour to limit future hiring to only those who have completed a or equivalent. If that is not possible, new staff will be encouraged to undertake training under this or a similar program. Should the requirement for a or equivalent become mandated and full funding for training be provided by the government, the parties agree to revisit the terms of this Letter of Understanding. Employees will be eligible for reimbursementof of the costs associated with writing a Prior Learning Assessment, provided they are successful and they have submitted a request for prior approval. DATED at Ontario this LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING “E” BETWEEN Community Living a division of COMMUNITY SERVICES (hereinafter referred to as the “Employer”) AND SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL .on (hereinafter referred to as the “Union”)

Related to Schedule Review

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Evaluation Schedule CLIENT REFERENCES The Tenderer shall provide details of his performance on each of the previous projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. “Client Reference Scorecards” will be completed by each of the respective Clients for the projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. The following are to be completed by the Client and Principal Agent and is to be supported in each case by a letter of award and the works completion certificate. Both Client and Principal Agent must sign and stamp the documents, failure to obtain both signatures and stamps will result in no allocation of points. PROJECT NAME and SCOPE OF WORK: Principal agent: ................................................................................................................................. Client: .. ..............................................................................................................................................

  • Title Review Seller shall be obligated to clear any and all encumbrances of title of an ascertainable monetary amount (“Seller Liens”), which Seller’s Liens Seller shall cause to be satisfied and or released at or prior to Closing (with Seller having the right to apply the Purchase Price or a portion thereof for such purpose). Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to the Due Diligence Date, Purchaser shall give notice (“Purchaser’s Title Notice”) to Seller of the existence of any encumbrances and defects in title to which Purchaser objects and that are not Permitted Encumbrances (“Title Objections”). Seller shall, within five (5) business days from receipt of Purchaser’s Title Notice, notify Purchaser of those Title Objections that Seller elects not to attempt to remove or correct, provided that failure of Seller to give said notice shall be deemed to mean that Seller shall remove or correct all of Purchaser’s Title Objections. In the event Seller elects to attempt to remove or correct Title Objections(s) and by the later of the Due Diligence Date or the date which is thirty (30) business days following Seller’s receipt of Purchaser’s Title Notice, Seller has not arranged for removal or correction of said Title Objections, then Purchaser shall either (i) terminate this Agreement in which event the Deposit shall be returned to Purchaser and the parties hereto shall have no further rights or obligations hereunder, except for rights and obligations which, by their terms, survive the termination hereof, or (ii) accept the condition of the title to the Property as it then is, without diminution of the Purchase Price. If Purchaser fails to elect (i) above, then Purchaser shall be deemed to have elected (ii) above. Encumbrances and defects to title that are not included in Purchaser’s Title Objections and those Title Objections that are accepted pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed to be Permitted Encumbrances. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Seller’s Liens shall not be deemed Permitted Encumbrances. Recording fees for recording documents to discharge Title Objections and Seller’s Liens shall be borne by Seller.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

  • Exclusion Review Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be:

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.