Scenario 2 Clause Examples

Scenario 2. If you have a balance of £100, and the minimum payment we ask you for in your statement is £20, and there is a refund to your account of £90 between your statement date and your payment due date, (or your Direct Debit date, if earlier), then we will reduce the minimum payment needed so that it equals the full remaining balance of £10.

Scenario 2 railway APT declared by a Digital Service Provider

Scenario 2. In the event the Net Settlement Fund is less than the total of the Amounts Allegedly Withheld for all Claimants submitting Valid Claims, but greater than the amount needed to pay each Claimant submitting a Valid Claim his or her Adjusted Amount (specified below), Claimants submitting a Valid Claim will receive Settlement Payments of their Adjusted Amount. The “Adjusted Amount” for each Claimant, based on the Claimant’s “Payment Group” will be defined as follows:

Scenario 2. PTC exploits the Programme Intellectual Property on a For-Profit Basis through outlicensing of a Product to a Third Party on a worldwide, exclusive basis prior to Regulatory Approval. ​ a) The parties shall hold an economic stake (“Base Shares”) in the Product calculated as of outlicensing effective date based on their respective economic contributions. ​ i) On the Commencement Date, PTC begins with $5.4 million Base Shares, and the Trust with zero. ​ ii) As the Trust pays the proposed the proposed $5.4 million US funding amount over the Programme Term, the Trust’s Base Share shall increase proportionately. By way of example, [**]. ​ iii) Following the Programme Term, PTC’s ownership of Base Shares shall increase proportionately based on PTC’s continuing economic contribution. By way of example, [**]. ​ b) All consideration attributable to outlicensing to a Third Party (other than debt at arm’s length interest rates or bona fide research funding) shall be divided between PTC and the Trust according to relative Base Share ownership at the time of such outlicensing. By way of example, [**]. ​ c) For clarity, once outlicensing under this scenario has occurred, then the milestones provided for in scenario 1 shall no longer apply following the effective date of the outlicense; provided, that if a milestone trigger event occurred prior to the outlicense but installment payments are ongoing, PTC must complete such milestone payments. ​ d) For clarity, neither PTC nor the Third Party gaining the outlicense shall make any royalty payments to the Trust under this scenario. ​ e) License or access payments to Third Parties for enabling technologies required, in the good faith judgment of PTC, to develop and commercialize a Product shall be counted in the calculation of Base Shares under this scenario; provided, however, that such payments shall not include license or access payments made with respect to the composition of matter or method of use of those active ingredient(s) in the Product that incorporate, comprise or are derived from the Programme Intellectual Property. ​

Scenario 2. Virus classification, spreading behaviour, and failure.

Scenario 2. It was time to improve the virtual machine. More resources were assigned to iula04v and some updates were done: • 2 CPUs instead of only one. However it must be taken into account that the host machine Isolde has only 8 CPUs for its internal use and 5 running virtual machines. This means that the CPUs may have to be shared anyway. • 6 GB RAM instead of just 4. • New Tomcat version 7.0.8 These improvements reduced the error bursts as expected but they didn’t improved execution time and didn’t solved the problem of unfinished executions due to the “waiting for data” iterations. After a few research it was found that using the Apache Tomcat Native Library could improve performance: Test results:

Scenario 2. If the Transferring Customer transfers to a RES that is not an Affiliate of the Seller and not an Affiliate of any of the Buyer’s power suppliers, Buyer shall be entitled to RCOA reduction provided that: a. The Transferring Customer was an existing captive customer of the Buyer prior to COD; b. The average monthly demand of the Transferring Customer for the 12 months immediately preceding the switching date c. Buyer’s RCOA Reduction quantity shall be computed using the following formula: Formula: 𝐵𝑀𝑊 𝐴𝑀𝑊 = [ ] ∗ [𝐸𝑀𝑊] ∑ 𝐶𝑀𝑊 + 𝐷𝑊𝐸𝑆𝑀𝑀𝑊 𝐴𝑀𝑊 – Seller Carve-Out (in MW) which is equivalent to the reduction of Contracted Capacity due to switching of Contestable Customer (yearly basis from interval 0001H-2400H) ��𝑀𝑊 – Contract Capacity (in MW) prior to the reduction date ∑ 𝐶𝑀𝑊 – Current Aggregated Capacity (in MW) of suppliers contracted by Buyer, immediately prior to the reduction date 𝐷𝑊𝐸𝑆𝑀𝑀𝑊– Annual Average Exposure (Purchases, in MW) of Buyer to the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market, immediately prior to the reduction date 𝐸𝑀𝑊 – Capacity for Switching (in MW), equivalent to the Average Demand of contestable customers for the 12 months immediately preceding the reduction date. The Contract Capacity and Associated Energy shall be reduced equivalent to the reduction in the demand of affected ECs by reason of the implementation of Retail Competition and Open Access, the Renewable Energy Law, orother relevant Laws and Legal Requirements.

Scenario 2. Robot available for interaction (i.e. Robot responding to an initial request from a group which is at several meters)

Scenario 2. 100% GLF (short term)