SCALABILITY TESTING AND RESULTS Sample Clauses

SCALABILITY TESTING AND RESULTS. 31 4.1. Approach and Rational of Testing 31 4.2. Adding federation layers 32 4.3. Transfer protocols 33 4.4. Remote testing between sites 33 4.5. Results 34 4.5.1. Namespace Scalability Results 34 4.5.2. Parallel Write Tests 36 4.5.3. Parallel Read Tests 38 4.5.4. Parallel Read/Write Tests 40 4.5.5. Volume Tests 41 4.5.6. Inter-Site Testing 43 4.5.7. Other Tests 44
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SCALABILITY TESTING AND RESULTS. 4.1. Approach and Rational of Testing This section describes more details of the scalability test plan, an explanation and justifications of why, how the tests are performed and which centres are involved, and the challenge of testing scalability. As a part of the initial work the organisations involved in this task defined a set of tests which are to believe to meet some of the scalability issues likely to occur in the archival of large volumes of data. Details of the test plan are given in Annex B of this report. These cover the aspects previously mentioned including transfer rate testing when systems are under load and the impact of adding federation layers to access underlying storage, and namespace scalability tests. In order to meaningfully assess scalability limitations imposed by federation technologies, it is first necessary to understand the scalability and performance limitations of the underlying storage technologies. Within this task, six sites representing data centres have been involved (q.v. below) which cover a range of different storage technologies. In setting up these tests, each site has made their test storage infrastructure as similar as possible to that which is run in production. Accepting that there are differences between sites, we have endeavoured to capture these differences as part of the process; so for example we recorded the TCP/IP settings for each site, the specification of the hardware such as network cards and physical memory, whether the hardware is being run on physical or virtual machines, and so on. These could have an impact on the results obtained from each site and so are necessary for a full understanding of the results. It should also be noted that this ‘baseline testing’ did not include any federation tests; we did not try to replicate data between sites. This was a conscious decision since agreeing on a transfer technology would have been an arduous task and is not really relevant to understanding the scalability limitations of the storage systems themselves. We have also elected not to look at the scalability of any offline or nearline archives that may be associated with the storage system. While many data centres use such archives (for example tape robots or ‘green’ disks), accessing data on them needs to be controlled to ensure that efficient use is made of this facility. Within WLCG access is to the archival system is restricted to production managers; normal users typically do not have rights to trigger...
Sample 1

Related to SCALABILITY TESTING AND RESULTS

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester.

  • CONTINUITY OF OPERATION Section 1: No Strikes, Work Stoppages or Lockouts Neither of the parties shall utilize any economic sanction to force its position on the other party over any issue. Further, no Employee or group of Employees shall individually or through concerted action, take part in any activity that impedes the operation of the business, except as otherwise authorized by this Agreement. Should any person or group of people participate in any such unauthorized activity, upon notification of such occurrence, the Union or the Company, as the case may be, will direct such person or group of people to resume normal operations and will take effective means to cease the unauthorized conduct. Any employee or group of employees who participate in such unauthorized activity shall be subject to immediate dismissal, unless mitigating circumstances exist that are acceptable to the ERRC. Should either party suffer financial damage as a result of such unauthorized activity, they may pursue compensation for such loss at the arbitration step of the Concern Resolution Process, and the arbitrator shall have full authority to remedy any violation of this Article.

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Test The outer surface of the lamp lenses shall be subjected once or more than once to the action of the sand jet produced as described above. The jet shall be sprayed almost perpendicular to the surface to be tested. The deterioration shall be checked by means of one or more samples of glass placed as a reference near the lenses to be tested. The mixture shall be sprayed until the variation in the diffusion of light on the sample or samples measured by the method described in Appendix 2, is such that: Δ d = (T5 - T4) / T2 ≤ 0.0250 ± 0.0025 Several reference samples may be used to check that the whole surface to be tested has deteriorated homogeneously. Annex 6 - Appendix 4

  • Positive Test Results In the event an employee tests positive for drug use, the employee will be provided, in writing, notice of their right to explain the test results. The employee may indicate any relevant circumstance, including over the counter or prescription medication taken within the last thirty (30) days, or any other information relevant to the reliability of, or explanation for, a positive test result.

  • CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (1) Engage in any business activities substantially different than those in which Borrower is presently engaged, (2) cease operations, liquidate, merge, transfer, acquire or consolidate with any other entity, change its name, dissolve or transfer or sell Collateral out of the ordinary course of business, or (3) pay any dividends on Borrower's stock (other than dividends payable in its stock), provided, however that notwithstanding the foregoing, but only so long as no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing or would result from the payment of dividends, if Borrower is a "Subchapter S Corporation" (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended), Borrower may pay cash dividends on its stock to its shareholders from time to time in amounts necessary to enable the shareholders to pay income taxes and make estimated income tax payments to satisfy their liabilities under federal and state law which arise solely from their status as Shareholders of a Subchapter S Corporation because of their ownership of shares of Borrower's stock, or purchase or retire any of Borrower's outstanding shares or alter or amend Borrower's capital structure.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.