RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION BASED ON POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE Sample Clauses

RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION BASED ON POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE. IMPLEMENTATION Based on the final report submitted by the Beneficiary (including reports from individual participants taking part in the activities, if relevant for the Outcome) and products and outputs produced by the project, DZS may establish whether the project’s implementation was poor, partial or late. DZS may also consider the information received from any other relevant source proving that the project is not implemented in accordance with the contractual provisions. Other sources of information may include monitoring visits and desk checks undertaken by DZS. The final report will be assessed on the basis of quality criteria and scored on a total of maximum 100 points. If the final report scores below 50 points in total, DZS may reduce the final grant amount on the basis of poor, partial or late implementation of the action even if all the reported activities were eligible and actually took place. The final report will be assessed in conjunction with the reports of individual participants and products and outputs produced by the project, using a common set of quality criteria focusing on: • The extent to which the project was implemented in line with the grant agreement. • The impact on the participating organisations and the target group of the project. • The quality of the activities undertaken and their consistency with the project objectives. • The quality of the products and outputs produced and their consistency with the project objectives. • With respect to the participating organisations, the extent to which the project proved to be innovative. • The extent to which the project proved to add to the overall objectives of the programme Education and EEA Grants 2014-2021. • The extent to which the project implemented effective quality measures as well as measures for evaluating the project’s outcomes. • The potential wider impact of the project on individuals and organisations beyond the beneficiaries. • The quality and scope of the dissemination activities undertaken. A grant reduction based on poor, partial or late implementation may be applied to the final amount of eligible expenditures and may be: • 25%, if the final report scores at least 40 points and below 50 points, • 50%, if the final report scores at least 25 points and below 40 points, • 75%, if the final report scores below 25 points.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (13)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION BASED ON POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • Selection Based on Consultants’ Qualifications Services estimated to cost less than $100,000 equivalent per contract may be procured under contracts awarded in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1, 3.7 and 3.8 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Certification of Meeting or Exceeding Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy Minimum Standards A. Grantee certifies that it has adopted and enforces a Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy that meets or exceeds all of the following minimum standards of:

  • District’s Evaluation of Consultant and Consultant’s Employees and/or Subcontractors The District may evaluate the Consultant in any way the District is entitled pursuant to applicable law. The District’s evaluation may include, without limitation:

  • Code of Basic Working Conditions and Human Rights Xxxxx is committed to providing a safe and secure working environment and the protection and advancement of basic human rights in its worldwide operations. In furtherance of this commitment, Xxxxx has adopted a Code of Basic Working Conditions and Human Rights setting out in detail the measures it takes to ensure this commitment is fulfilled. This code may be downloaded at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/principles/xxxxx-xxxxxx.xxxx. Xxxxx strongly encourages Seller to adopt and enforce concepts similar to those embodied in the Boeing Code, including conducting Seller’s operations in a manner that is fully compliant with all applicable laws and regulations pertaining to fair wages and treatment, freedom of association, personal privacy, collective bargaining, workplace safety and environmental protection. Seller shall include the substance of this clause, including this flowdown requirement, in all subcontracts awarded by Seller for work under this Contract.

  • DISQUALIFICATION FOR PAST PERFORMANCE AND FINDINGS OF NON RESPONSIBILITY Bidder may be disqualified from receiving awards if Bidder, or anyone in Bidder’s employment, has previously failed to perform satisfactorily in connection with public Bidding or contracts or is deemed non- responsible.

  • Sole Source as Grounds for Rejection of a Change Order If a Change Order is submitted to Contractor for the purposes of adding a Bulletin to this Contract and said Bulletin designates a Sole Source from which Contractor is required to procure goods or services necessary to perform the Work, which Sole Source has not been designated previously, Contractor shall be entitled to reject the proposed Change Order if the designated Sole Source refuses to provide to Contractor the warranties, bonds, terms or schedule required under the Contract Documents, including any warranty or terms or schedule required by Bulletins referenced in the proposed Change Order. In such event, Contractor shall give written notice to the Owner rejecting the proposed Change Order and, if possible, shall accompany said written notice with a proposal from Contractor for changes or modifications to the Bulletin so as to eliminate the Sole Source designation but to achieve goods or services equal in quality or function. The Owner may then require the Design Professional to revise the subject Bulletin so as to eliminate the designation of the Sole Source by incorporation of Contractor's proposal or otherwise. Upon revision of the Bulletin by the Design Professional and approval thereof by the Owner, the Owner shall again submit to the Contractor a proposed Change Order for the purpose of adding the revised Bulletin to this Contract. If the Owner decides to retain the Sole Source in the Change Order and Contractor cannot acquire the full contractually required warranties from the Sole Source, Contractor shall be held only to the warranty terms and schedule obtainable from the Sole Source.

  • Coverage for Members Who Are Hospitalized on Their Effective Date If you are in the hospital on your effective date of coverage, healthcare services related to such hospitalization are covered as long as: (a) you notify us of your hospitalization within forty-eight (48) hours of the effective date, or as soon as is reasonably possible; and (b) covered healthcare services are received in accordance with the terms, conditions, exclusions and limitations of this agreement. As always, benefits paid in such situations are subject to the Coordination of Benefits provisions.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services 1. Quality- and Cost-based Selection. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 2 below, consultants’ services shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality and Cost-based Selection.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.