Role Review Sample Clauses

Role Review. On the first anniversary of appointment and biennially thereafter, or at another mutually agreed time, consultation will occur between the School and the employee to ensure that the job description is accurate and conforms with the classification levels set out in Schedule 6. If an agreed Job Description is not achieved within eight working weeks of the anniversary date, then the Dispute Resolution process may be invoked. Teacher in Charge A teacher who is, from time to time, left in charge of a School in circumstances where the Principal (and Deputy Principal where applicable) is absent from the premises for a whole day or more and where there is no person with classification greater than or equal to 9 leadership points, shall be paid an allowance as specified in Schedule 1 for each day of higher duties. The allowance shall be paid from the first day of the absence. A day is defined as commencing at the start bell and concluding at the finish bell. This Clause 78 shall not operate to the exclusion of Clause 68 Higher Duties – Teachers.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Role Review. An ESO may request that consultation occur at a mutually agreed time between the employer and the employee to ensure that the duty statement is accurate and conforms with the classification levels as detailed in Appendix E (ESO) or Appendix F (IEO). Clause 98: Professional Development and Training
Sample 1Sample 2
Role Review. (a) On the first anniversary of appointment (and annually thereafter), or at another mutually agreed time, consultation will occur between the School and the Lutheran School Officer to ensure that the job description is accurate and conforms to the classification grades set out in Schedule 4.
Sample 1
Role Review. On the first anniversary of appointment and biennially thereafter, or at another mutually agreed time, consultation will occur between the College and the Employee to ensure that the duty statement is accurate and conforms with the classification levels set out in SCHEDULE 5and SCHEDULE 7.
Sample 1
Role Review. On the first anniversary of appointment and annually thereafter a formal Performance Review will be undertaken at which, amongst other criteria, consultation will occur between the School and the Employee to ensure that the duty statement is accurate and conforms with the classification levels set out in Schedule 4.
Sample 1
Role Review. After a period of 5 years and again after 10 years, Prosper, HCC, Continuum (so long as the Continuum DDA is in effect), and any applicable Developers shall review the charter and role of the BCCOC and its subcommittees. Parties may choose to adjust the role of the BCCOC or subcommittees after 5 years by consensus (the process for which will be described with particularity in the Charter). If after 10 years enough operational activity is present on the Broadway Corridor, and the BCCOC and subcommittee roles are substantially completed, Xxxxxxx may initiate a closeout of the committee and/or subcommittees and create an inclusion-centered operations body. To the extent the close-out in 10 years (should it occur) results in substantial cost savings, Xxxxxxx will discuss with the BCCOC and will consider in good faith the potential allocation of all or a portion of the anticipated cost savings to the Construction Equity Fund or other similar purposes.
Sample 1
Role Review. The Union may request Vancity to conduct a review of a role, where a substantial change of duties can be demonstrated. Such request must be made in writing, detailing the duties and responsibilities that do not fall substantially within those contained in the job description. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached, the matter may be referred to arbitration as provided for in this collective agreement.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Role Review. On the anniversary of appointment and biennially thereafter, or at another mutually agreed time, consultation will occur between the employer and the employee to ensure that the duty statement is accurate and conforms with the classification levels as detailed in Appendix K (Education Support Officers) or Appendix L (Indigenous Education Officers).
Sample 1
Role Review. If a School Assistant, or their line manager, believes the employee's role needs a review, they are entitled to request that consultation occur between the employer and the employee to ensure that the duty statement is accurate and conforms to the classification levels as detailed in Appendix E (Classification Structure for School Assistants). The employee's request should proceed via their line manager. The employer shall not unreasonably refuse to act upon such a request.
Sample 1

Related to Role Review

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Submittal Review 7.10.1 The A/E shall review Submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data, and Samples for conformity with design intent and conformity with the Contract Documents within 14 days of receiving Submittals or in accordance with the approved submittal schedule, or other period as mutually agreed by the A/E and Contractor.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Title Review Seller shall be obligated to clear any and all encumbrances of title of an ascertainable monetary amount (“Seller Liens”), which Seller’s Liens Seller shall cause to be satisfied and or released at or prior to Closing (with Seller having the right to apply the Purchase Price or a portion thereof for such purpose). Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to the Due Diligence Date, Purchaser shall give notice (“Purchaser’s Title Notice”) to Seller of the existence of any encumbrances and defects in title to which Purchaser objects and that are not Permitted Encumbrances (“Title Objections”). Seller shall, within five (5) business days from receipt of Purchaser’s Title Notice, notify Purchaser of those Title Objections that Seller elects not to attempt to remove or correct, provided that failure of Seller to give said notice shall be deemed to mean that Seller shall remove or correct all of Purchaser’s Title Objections. In the event Seller elects to attempt to remove or correct Title Objections(s) and by the later of the Due Diligence Date or the date which is thirty (30) business days following Seller’s receipt of Purchaser’s Title Notice, Seller has not arranged for removal or correction of said Title Objections, then Purchaser shall either (i) terminate this Agreement in which event the Deposit shall be returned to Purchaser and the parties hereto shall have no further rights or obligations hereunder, except for rights and obligations which, by their terms, survive the termination hereof, or (ii) accept the condition of the title to the Property as it then is, without diminution of the Purchase Price. If Purchaser fails to elect (i) above, then Purchaser shall be deemed to have elected (ii) above. Encumbrances and defects to title that are not included in Purchaser’s Title Objections and those Title Objections that are accepted pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed to be Permitted Encumbrances. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Seller’s Liens shall not be deemed Permitted Encumbrances. Recording fees for recording documents to discharge Title Objections and Seller’s Liens shall be borne by Seller.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.