RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. Whenever one party to the Contract in good faith has reason to question the other party’s intent to perform, demand may be made to the other party for written assurance of the intent to perform. In the event that no assurance is given within the time specified after demand is made, the demanding party may treat this failure as an anticipatory repudiation of the Contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If the State in good faith has reason to believe that the Contractor does not intend to, or is unable to perform or continue performing under this Contract, the Procurement Officer may demand in writing that the Contractor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Failure by the Contractor to provide written assurance within the number of Days specified in the demand may, at the State’s option, be the basis for terminating the Contract under the Uniform Terms and Conditions or other rights and remedies available by law or provided by the contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If the AZDOHS in good faith has reason to believe that the Subrecipient does not intend to, or is unable to perform or continue performing under this Agreement, the AZDOHS may demand in writing that the Subrecipient give a written assurance of intent and ability to perform. If the Subrecipient fails to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand, the AZDOHS at its option may terminate this Agreement.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. Whenever a party to this Agreement in good faith has reason to question another party’s intent to perform, the party may demand that the other party give a written assurance of its intent to perform. In the event that a demand is made and no written assurance is given within five (5) days, the demanding party may treat this failure as an anticipatory repudiation or Event of Default of this Agreement.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If the Department, in good faith, has reason to believe that the Contractor does not intend to, or is unable to perform or has refused to perform or continue performing all material obligations under this Contract, the Department may demand in writing that the Contractor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Failure by Contractor to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand (not less than five business days) may, at the Department’s option, be the basis for terminating this Contract under the terms and conditions or other rights and remedies available by law or provided by this Contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If the School District/public entity in good faith has reason to believe that the Contractor does not intend to, or is unable to perform or continue performing under this Contract, the Procurement Officer may demand in writing that the Contractor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Failure by the Contractor to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand may, at the School district/public entity’s option, be the basis for terminating the Contract under the Uniform Terms and Conditions.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If the State, in good faith, has reason to believe that Contractor does not intend to, is unable to, or has refused to perform or continue performing all material obligations under this contract, the State may demand in writing that Contractor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Contractor’s failure to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand (in no event less than five business days may, at the State's option, be the basis for terminating this contract and pursuing the rights and remedies available under this contract or law.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. If DSHS, in good faith, has reason to believe that Contractor does not intend to, or is unable to perform or has refused to perform or continue performing all material obligations under this Agreement, DSHS may demand in writing that Contractor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Failure by Contractor to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand (in no event less than five business days) may, at DSHS's option, be the basis for terminating this Agreement under the terms and conditions or other rights and remedies available by law or provided by this Contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. Whenever one party to this Contract in good faith has reason to question the other party's intent to perform, the former party may demand that the other party give a written assurance of this intent to perform. In the even t that a demand is made and no written assurance is given within five (5) days, the demanding party may treat this failure as an anticipatory repudiation with this Contract.
RIGHT TO ASSURANCE. The Procurement Officer may, at any time, demand in writing that the Qualified Vendor give a written assurance of intent to perform. Failure by the Qualified Vendor to provide written assurance within the number of days specified in the demand may, at the State’s option, be the basis for terminating the Agreement under these Terms and Conditions or other rights and remedies available by law or provided by the Agreement. If the Qualified Vendor, at any time believes that it may potentially no longer be able to perform under this Agreement in the immediate future or at any time up to six (6) months into the future, the Qualified Vendor shall provide written notice to the Division informing the Division of the Qualified Vendor’s potential inability to perform under this Agreement along with a detailed explanation as to why the Qualified Vendor believes it may not be able to complete performance.
