Review on NPOA implementation Sample Clauses

Review on NPOA implementation. It was intended that a paper reviewing the implementation effectiveness of the IPOA/NPOA process in the conservation of seabirds in RFMOs and coastal States be presented at the meeting. This paper will now be prepared for SBWG5. In the absence of the paper the Convenor called for information from Working Group members on progress in developing new NPOAs and reviewing existing plans. WWF strongly encouraged Parties to develop effective NPOA -Seabirds that closely follow the FAO IPOA Technical Guidelines and that are underpinned by robust time-bound implementation plans. They expressed particular interest in the review of existing NPOA- Seabirds and requested that this information be made available to the Agreement intersessionally, given that the next Advisory Committee meeting might be held as much as 18 months away. As asked by the Convenor, Argentina2 reported to the Parties that Argentina`s Plan of Action was only approved in 2010, so an implementation report has still to be developed. This is scheduled for late 2011 – early 2012. A number of scientific and technical projects were being carried out in different fisheries, particularly in trawl fisheries, some of which were presented at the meeting under other agenda items. Triggered by the First South American Observers Workshop, a national group comprising observer program leaders, NGOs, scientists, provincial authorities from our five coastal provinces: Buenos Aires, Río Negro, Chubut, Santa Xxxx and Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur, and national authorities has been established to review bycatch data. The first task for this group was to identify and characterise Argentina’s fisheries according to the interaction with seabirds on a vessel by vessel basis. This has permitted precise and complete information of bycatch data to be included in Argentina’s national report. It was noted that the Second South American Observers Workshop, to be held later this year, will provide further support for capacity building in the region. Brazil’s NPOA-Seabirds was published in 2006. Earlier this year the Xxxxx Xxxxxx Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio) held an expert consultation in order to assess the level of implementation of the Plan. A revision of the NPOA is planned to be made next year. One of the objectives of this revision is to harmonise, as much as possible, the objectives, goals and activities of Brazil’s NPOA-Seabirds with those of the ACAP Plan of Action in order to o...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Review on NPOA implementation

  • Implementation Report Within 150 days after the Effective Date, Extendicare shall submit a written report to OIG summarizing the status of its implementation of the requirements of this CIA (Implementation Report). The Implementation Report shall, at a minimum, include:

  • Project Implementation 2. The Borrower shall:

  • COOPERATION IN IMPLEMENTATION On demand of the other Spouse and without undue delay or expense, each Spouse shall execute, acknowledge, or deliver any instrument, furnish any information, or perform any other acts reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. If a Spouse fails to execute any document as required by this provision, the court may appoint the court clerk or his or her authorized designee to execute the document on that Xxxxxx’s behalf.

  • Implementation Schedule TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE with regard to all dates and time periods set forth and/or incorporated herein. Any material modification or deviation from an approved schedule described in this Agreement shall occur only upon approval of the City and RDA, with any such approvals required to be in writing as an amendment to this Agreement, and which approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld. City shall cooperate and act promptly with respect to any and all permits or approvals necessary for completion of the Project. Notwithstanding the above, this Agreement shall not limit the discretion of the City, or any of its duly appointed and authorized governing bodies, boards or entities, in approving or rejecting any aspect of the Project or improvements contemplated on or about the Property.

  • Implementation Program 1. The Borrower shall:

  • Commercial Operation Date Testing and Modifications Prior to the Commercial Operation Date, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall test the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities and System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades and Developer shall test the Large Generating Facility and the Developer Attachment Facilities to ensure their safe and reliable operation. Similar testing may be required after initial operation. Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner shall each make any modifications to its facilities that are found to be necessary as a result of such testing. Developer shall bear the cost of all such testing and modifications. Developer shall generate test energy at the Large Generating Facility only if it has arranged for the injection of such test energy in accordance with NYISO procedures.

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Implementation and Review The Parties shall consult annually, or as otherwise agreed, to review the implementation of this Chapter and consider other matters of mutual interest affecting trade in services. (10) 10 Such consultations will be addressed under Article 170 (Free Trade Commission) of Chapter 14 (Administration of the Agreement).

  • Joint Network Implementation and Grooming Process Upon request of either Party, the Parties shall jointly develop an implementation and grooming process (the “Joint Grooming Process” or “Joint Process”) which may define and detail, inter alia:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.