Review of Proposals. Every project will be evaluated for the value of its aesthetic improvement, extent/scope of work proposed and its potential economic impact. The staff review will consider the following aspects for its proposal review:
Review of Proposals. DHS, ONA will convene a review committee of public employees to review the recommendations and make final award decisions. The bidder is advised that the contract award may be conditional upon final contract and budget negotiation. Additionally, if a bidder is determined, in DHS/ONA’s sole discretion, to be insolvent or to present insolvency for this project, DHS/ONA will deem the proposal ineligible for grant award. DHS/ONA reserves the right to reject any and all proposals when circumstances indicate that it is in its best interest to do so. DHS/XXX’s best interests in this context include, but are not limited to, loss of funding, inability of the bidder(s) to achieve performance, an indication of misrepresentation of information and/or non-compliance with State and federal laws and regulations, existing DHS contracts, and procedures set forth in DHS Policy Circular P1.04(xxxx://xxx.xx.xxx/humanservices/olra/ocpm/resources/manuals/). DHS/ONA will notify all bidders of grant awards, contingent upon the satisfactory final negotiation of a contract, by October 8, 2021.
Review of Proposals. Review and approve or disapprove within seven (7) business days from receipt of Owner’s written proposal any proposed changes suggested by Owner, pursuant to Section 5(a)(viii), unless Harbor informs Owner prior to the lapse of that time, that additional time is needed to make such determination. In the event additional time is required, any decision must be made without unnecessary delay, and in any case, within ten (10) business days of the original, written Owner proposal. If Harbor does not provide Owner with its approval, disapproval or request for additional time within the time period provided, then such proposed change shall be deemed accepted and approved.
Review of Proposals i) Upon receipt of a complete Proposal, Owner shall have the option to review each pole Licensee seeks to occupy to determine whether such pole can accommodate the proposed Attachment (“Engineering Review”) and to then notify Licensee whether such Attachment can commence without modifications or rearrangement of the pole or whether certain actions must be undertaken prior to Licensee’s construction of the proposed Attachment. Owner shall provide Licensee Notice within fifteen (15) days after submission of a Proposal if it believes the Proposal is incomplete or if Owner elects to forgo conducting the Engineering Review.
Review of Proposals. Subject to instruction and oversight by the Research Board, the GoMRI Administrative Unit shall provide administrative support for the Research Board review of Proposals submitted by Research Consortia in response to RFPs. GoMRI Administrative Unit activities in this capacity shall include (a) receiving and responding to letters of intent and Proposals; (b) arranging for and managing the timely peer review of the Proposals pursuant to the NSB Peer Evaluation Process, including the recruitment of highly-qualified technical reviewers to perform such review; (c) sorting and compiling the peer review results into formats requested by the Research Board; and (d) providing the Research Board with any additional information requested by the Research Board during the review process. Discretionary decisions regarding funding contained in Proposals shall be made under the peer review process described in this Section 5.4. These review activities shall be conducted in accordance with applicable NSF standards, and the GoMRI Administrative Unit shall ensure that all Proposals and associated reviews and discussions of such Proposals are handled on a strictly confidential basis, in satisfaction of all applicable legal requirements.
Review of Proposals. Every project will be evaluated for the value of its aesthetic improvement to the Old Town Elburn Business District, extent/scope of work proposed, and its potential economic impact on the District. The staff review will consider the following aspects for its proposal review:
Review of Proposals. Every project will be evaluated for the value of its aesthetic improvement to the Public Square Overlay District, extent/scope of work proposed, and its potential economic impact on the District. The CDA will consider the following aspects for its proposal review:
Review of Proposals. The Selection Committee will use a point formula during the review process to individually score Project Proposals, as outlined in Section C1 below, “Project Proposal Evaluation Criteria.” The Selection Committee will then be convened to review and discuss these evaluations and combine the individual scores to arrive at an average composite Project Proposal score for each firm. Firms that do not meet “Mandatory Elements” listed in Section C1 below will be eliminated from further consideration. After the composite Project Proposal score for each firm has been established based upon the “Qualitative Evaluation” criteria listed in Section C2, the Selection Committee may request oral presentations from a subset of those firms with a minimum score of 70 points. Based upon score rankings, the three (3) highest ranking firms may be interviewed. The Selection Committee may also schedule a site visit, if applicable. The Cost Proposal of firms receiving a minimum score of 70 points on the qualitative review will be opened to ensure that the Cost Proposal is reasonable. The cost proposal for these services should consist of hourly rate for all classifications assigned to this project.
Review of Proposals. Review and approve or disapprove within seven (7) business days from receipt of Owner’s written proposal submitted pursuant to Section 5(a)(viii), unless Solomon informs Owner prior to the lapse of that time, that additional time is needed to make such determination. In the event additional time is required, any decision must be made without unnecessary delay, and in any case, within ten (10) business days of the original, written Owner proposal. If Solomon does not provide Owner with its approval, disapproval or request for additional time within the time period provided, then such proposed change shall be deemed accepted and approved.
Review of Proposals. Subject to instruction and oversight by the Research Board, the GoMRI Administrative Unit shall provide administrative support for the Research Board review of Proposals submitted by Research Consortia in response to RFPs. GoMRI Administrative Unit activities in this capacity shall include (a) receiving and responding to letters of intent and Proposals; (b) arranging for and managing the timely peer review of the Proposals pursuant to the NSB Peer Evaluation Process, including the recruitment of highly-qualified technical reviewers to perform such review; (c) sorting and compiling the peer review results into formats requested by the Research Board; (d) providing the Research Board with any additional information requested by the Research Board during the review process. Discretionary decisions regarding funding contained in Proposals shall be made under the peer review process described in this Section 5.4, and (e) performing any functions required pursuant to the conflict of interest policy described in 3.2.1. These review activities shall be conducted in accordance with applicable NSF standards, and the GoMRI Administrative Unit shall ensure that all Proposals and associated reviews and discussions of such Proposals are handled on a strictly confidential basis, in satisfaction of all applicable legal requirements.
