Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions Sample Clauses

Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. A. If the County does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision of the County after the steps in Section 2. or
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. A. If the County does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision of the County after the steps in Section 2. or 3. of this Article have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than fifty (50) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included.
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. A. If the County does not respond at the end of one hundred twenty (120) days or if the Union does not agree with a position classification decision of the County, after the steps in Section 2. have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than twenty-five (25) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year.
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. A. If the Superior Court does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision as approved by the Superior Court after the steps in Section 2. or 3. of this Article have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than five (5) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included.
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions 

Related to Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

  • Deadlock Unless otherwise expressly set forth herein, in the event the Members are unable to reach agreement on or make a decision with respect to any matter on which the Members are entitled to vote, the matter shall be subject to the Internal Dispute Resolution Procedure described in Article 13 hereof.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • CONSEQUENCES OF POSITIVE TEST RESULTS For post-Accident or reasonable suspicion, a Covered Employee shall be immediately removed from performing his or her job or, in the alternative, may be temporarily reassigned to work that is not safety-sensitive if such work is available. The Covered Employee shall be subject to disciplinary action, and shall meet with the SAPC, as set forth in Exhibit A, and section 10 below, if the Covered Employee:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.