Review Cycles. A/E’s Professional Services Schedule shall incorporate standard design milestone review cycles and shall include for each cycle the following: (i) Submittal of Deliverables; (ii) Initial review by Project Team [Owner, if not a CMR delivery]; (iii) review meeting to receive and discuss review comments; (iv) Provide comprehensive list of comments to the Project Team; and (v) resolution of comments, where documented resolution of all comments to the Project Team is provided as certification to TFC that all comments have been reviewed and resolved in accordance with the Standard of Care. Following TFC’s acceptance of the A/E resolution of comments document, TFC shall issue a formal Notice of Authorization to A/E with a copy to the Project Team members so that A/E may proceed to the next design phase within three (3) Days of the certification, or the first weekday thereafter.
Review Cycles. At designated review cycles each year, GBCI will conduct its review, which includes review of the Application and all accompanying documentation You provide therewith to determine compliance with certain WELL Building Standard feature requirements toward the determination of (i) the overall WELL Portfolio Score for the Defined Portfolio; (ii) if the Projects are eligible for WELL Certification (and if so, the appropriate level of WELL Certification to be conferred), (iii) recertification and/or (iv) WELL D&O (design and operations) designation or other awards or distinctions You may seek, as applicable. On site performance testing and performance review along with the assessment of all other information provided to GBCI is collectively referred to as “WELL Performance Verification” or “Performance Verification.” Documents and performance testing results may be uploaded at any time for Defined Portfolios and Projects within a Defined Portfolio, and the portfolio administrator may schedule up to two review cycles per year. Additional review cycles may be scheduled as an Optional Service for an additional fee. At each review cycle, GBCI will review documents and performance testing results that have been submitted through the Platform to date, across all Projects within the Defined Portfolio and across all document scales as such documents are further discussed in the Portfolio Guidebook.
Review Cycles. CxA’s Professional Services Schedule shall incorporate standard design milestone review cycles and shall include for each cycle the following: (i) Submittal of Deliverables; (ii) Initial review by Project Team [Owner, if not a CMR delivery]; (iii) review meeting to receive and discuss review comments; (iv) Provide comprehensive list of comments to the Project Team; and (v) resolution of comments, where documented resolution of all comments to the Project Team is provided as certification to TFC that all comments have been reviewed and resolved in accordance with the Standard of Care.
Review Cycles. At designated review cycles each year, the individual(s) assigned to review Your Portfolio (“WELL Reviewer(s)”) will conduct its review, which includes review of the Application and all accompanying documentation You provide therewith to determine compliance with certain WELL Building Standard feature requirements toward the determination of (i) the overall WELL Portfolio Score for the Defined Portfolio; (ii) if the Projects are eligible for WELL Certification (and if so, the appropriate level of WELL Certification to be conferred), (iii) recertification and/or (iv) WELL Precertified designation, WELL Health-Safety Rating or other awards or designations You may seek, as applicable. On site performance testing and performance review along with the assessment of all other information provided to IWBI is collectively referred to as “WELL Performance Verification” or “Performance Verification.” Documents and performance testing results may be uploaded at any time for Defined Portfolios and Projects within a Defined Portfolio, and the portfolio administrator may schedule up to two review cycles per year. Additional review cycles may be scheduled as an Optional Service for an additional fee. At each review cycle, the WELL Reviewer will review documents and performance testing results that have been submitted through the Platform to date, across all Projects within the Defined Portfolio and across all document scales as such documents are further discussed in the Portfolio Guidebook. During a review cycle, an examination of documentation and performance testing results will be conducted to confirm compliance with the WELL Building Standard feature requirements. Reviews are conducted across Your Defined Portfolio.
