Retention and Promotion Decisions Sample Clauses

Retention and Promotion Decisions. The Board adopts the procedures that are identified and explained within the collective bargaining agreement to be used by district administrators in making retention and promotion decisions: Seniority shall not be a basis for making retention decisions, except when deciding between teachers who have comparable evaluations. Comparable evaluations are identified and explained in the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Retention and Promotion Decisions. If a professional staff member fails to perform his/her assigned responsibilities in a satisfactory manner, dismissal or non-renewal procedures may be invoked. In such instances, all relevant evaluation documents may be used in the proceedings. Promotion decisions do not typically apply to teachers covered by this policy, as they are not currently employed in any discernible hierarchy. If promotions are made, for instance in regard to determining department or grade level heads or chairpersons, such decisions will involve consideration of the eligible teachers’ evaluations. Nothing in this policy prevents the Board from exercising its rights to non-renew, terminate, or suspend a teaching contract as otherwise provided by law, Board policy, or the terms of this Agreement. Seniority shall not be the basis for making retention and promotion decisions, except when choosing between teachers who have comparable evaluations within the affected teaching field. Comparable evaluations shall be defined as follows:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Retention and Promotion Decisions. The Board uses evaluation results for the retention and promotion decisions. The Board adopts procedures for use by district administrators in making retention and promotion decisions based on evaluation results. Seniority shall not be a basis for making retention decisions, except when making a decision between teachers who have comparable evaluations.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Retention and Promotion Decisions a. The Board adopts the following procedures to be used by district administrators in using the evaluation results to make retention and promotion decisions: See Article 13 Master Agreement
Sample 1Sample 2
Retention and Promotion Decisions. It is the purpose of this Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation Policy to improve the quality of instruction, enhance student learning and strengthen professional competence through meaningful feedback and targeted professional development. In addition, the evaluations produced will serve to assist the Superintendent on employment decisions.
Sample 1Sample 2
Retention and Promotion Decisions. The Board adopts the following procedures to be used by district administrators in making retention and promotion decisions: Evaluations hall be considered when making retention (i.e. reduction in force) and promotion (i.e. granting of a continuing contract) decisions. Seniority shall not be a basis for making retention decisions, except when making a decision between teachers who have comparable evaluations. For purposes of this Agreement comparable evaluations shall mean all those teachers with a rating of accomplished, proficient and developing are placed in one group and all those teachers with a rating of ineffective are placed into a separate group.
Sample 1Sample 2
Retention and Promotion Decisions. The Board adopts the following procedures to be used by district administrators in making retention and promotion decisions; Seniority shall not be a basis for making retention decisions, except when making a decision between counselors who have comparable evaluations.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Retention and Promotion Decisions. The board shall require at least three formal observations of each teacher who is under consideration for nonrenewal and with whom the board has entered into a limited contract or an extended limited contract under section 3319.11 of the Revised Code. Seniority shall not be a basis for making retention decisions, except when making a decision between teachers who have comparable evaluations. Professional Development Due to the lack of funding and unknown resources related to state funding issues, the board will attempt to provide ample professional development as funds are available.
Sample 1

Related to Retention and Promotion Decisions

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

  • Investment Promotion and Protection 1. Bearing in mind the respective powers and competences of the Community and the Member States, cooperation shall aim to establish a favourable climate for private investment, both domestic and foreign, especially through better conditions for investment protection, the transfer of capital and the exchange of information on investment opportunities.

  • Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions 10.14.1 Contractor agrees to comply fully with and be bound by all of the provisions of Chapter 12T, “City Contractor/Subcontractor Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions,” of the San Francisco Administrative Code (“Chapter 12T”), including the remedies provided, and implementing regulations, as may be amended from time to time. The provisions of Chapter 12T are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The text of the Chapter 12T is available on the web at xxxx://xxxxx.xxx/olse/fco. Contractor is required to comply with all of the applicable provisions of 12T, irrespective of the listing of obligations in this Section. Capitalized terms used in this Section and not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in Chapter 12T.

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Finality of Decisions There shall be no appeal from any Arbitration Board's decision. Each such decision shall be final and binding on the Union and its members, the employee or employees involved, and the Company. The Union will discourage any attempt of its members, and will not encourage or co-operate with any of its members in any appeal to any Court or Labour Board from a decision of an Arbitration Board.

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. The Recipient shall: • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. Products: • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • Annual Negotiations Negotiations will be conducted each year according to the ground rules as mutually agreed upon prior to negotiations. Ground Rules (see APPENDIX F - GROUND RULES) used at the previous year's sessions will serve as the basis for discussing any changes before adopting ground rules for the current negotiating sessions. Such ground rules mutually agreed upon shall assist in the orderly process for negotiations.

  • Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.

  • Promotion of Agreement It is agreed that Vendor will encourage all eligible entities to purchase from the TIPS Program. Encouraging entities to purchase directly from the Vendor and not through TIPS Agreement is a violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and will result in removal of the Vendor from the TIPS Program.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.