Response rates Sample Clauses

Response rates. Table 2 shows the response rates by university, which ranged from 15.7% to 61.8%, with an overall response rate of 31.5%. This yielded 18,144 students who completed the survey.1 ▇▇▇▇▇ University 3,071 941 30.6% Carleton University 3,000 1030 34.3% Concordia University 4,624 1037 22.4% Concordia University College of Alberta 263 88 33.5% Dalhousie University 1,750 795 45.4% Lakehead University 1,000 418 41.8% MacEwan University 2,788 507 18.2% ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 3,475 564 16.2% Memorial University of Newfoundland 1,785 449 25.2% Mount Royal University 1,477 573 38.8% Nipissing University 956 408 42.7% Redeemer University College 168 83 49.4% Ryerson University 5,259 1785 33.9% Saint Mary's University 888 339 38.2% ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 1,000 606 60.6% St. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 860 484 56.3% St. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 371 214 57.7% The King's University College 110 68 61.8% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 792 261 33.0% Trinity Western University 287 136 47.4% Université de Moncton 807 377 46.7% Université de Sherbrooke 1,492 376 25.2% University of Lethbridge 1,322 392 29.7% University of Manitoba 2,125 607 28.6% University of New Brunswick (Fredericton) 1,000 331 33.1% University of New Brunswick (Saint ▇▇▇▇) 496 157 31.7% University of Ontario Institute of Technology 2,328 850 36.5% University of Ottawa 1,000 357 35.7% University of Regina 1,000 461 46.1% University of Saskatchewan 1,500 431 28.7% University of the Fraser Valley 1,085 434 40.0% University of Victoria 1,000 454 45.4% University of Waterloo 2,000 314 15.7% University of Winnipeg 1,761 638 36.2% Vancouver Island University 1,295 241 18.6% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 3,413 938 27.5% 1 PRA defined a completed survey as student who answered up to the Living Arrangements section (approximately 80% of the questions).

Response rates. In order for the CHKS data to be representative of the students in your district, minimally meet standards A through C and either standard D or E as listed below.

Response rates. Table 2 shows the response rates by university, which ranged from 17.2% to 63.9%, with an overall response rate of 34.1%. This yielded 18,092 students who completed the survey.1 Acadia University (Nova Scotia) 744 278 37.4% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (Alberta) 112 65 58.0% Athabasca University (Alberta) 20 9 45.0% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (Manitoba) 561 160 28.5% ▇▇▇▇▇ University (Ontario) 1000 213 21.3% ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (Alberta) 84 36 42.9% Cape Breton University (Nova Scotia) 384 226 58.9% Capilano University (British Columbia) 262 45 17.2% Carleton University (Ontario) 4209 1264 30.0% Concordia University (Quebec) 4482 880 19.6% Concordia University of Edmonton (Alberta) 360 138 38.3% Dalhousie University (Nova Scotia) 2262 767 33.9% Lakehead University (Ontario) 801 394 49.2% MacEwan University (Alberta) 2076 907 43.7% Mount ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (New Brunswick) 624 187 30.0% Mount Royal University (Alberta) 1329 643 48.4% Mount Saint ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (Nova Scotia) 296 86 29.1% Nipissing University (Ontario) 444 133 30.0% Redeemer University College (Ontario) 119 76 63.9% Ryerson University (Ontario) 2000 651 32.6% Saint Mary's University (Nova Scotia) 879 262 29.8% ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (British Columbia) 1000 622 62.2% St. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (Nova Scotia) 865 255 29.5% St. Mary's University (Alberta) 137 45 32.8% St. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (New Brunswick) 393 205 52.2% The King's University (Alberta) 188 84 44.7% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (British Columbia) 810 376 46.4% Trent University (Ontario) 1351 376 27.8% Trinity Western University (British Columbia) 343 127 37.0% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇) ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ 57.4% University of Calgary (Alberta) 3580 1378 38.5% University of King's College (Nova Scotia) 197 112 56.9% University of Lethbridge (Alberta) 1033 588 56.9% University of Manitoba (Manitoba) 1000 230 23.0% University of New Brunswick (New Brunswick) 1151 426 37.0% University of Northern British Columbia (British Columbia) 405 204 50.4% University of Ottawa (Ontario) 5000 1477 29.5% University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Island (▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Island) 725 300 41.4% University of Regina (Saskatchewan) 1500 444 29.6% University of Saskatchewan (Saskatchewan) 1000 313 31.3% University of the Fraser Valley (British Columbia) 743 168 22.6% University of Victoria (British Columbia) 1000 378 37.8% University of Waterloo (Ontario) 2000 905 45.3% University of Winnipeg (Manitoba) 1072 494 46.1% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University (Ontario) 3761 748 19.9% For historical com...

Response rates. The total responses received will be dependent upon the participation rate of the students at the School. The School is fully responsible for evaluating whether the sample size is sufficient to provide enough statistical power for any desired analysis planned by the School. SoundRocket assumes no responsibility or liability for any problems associated with the response rate, including, but not limited to, low student participation, bad contact information, failure of email delivery, and/or failure of incentives.

Response rates. Table 2 shows the response rates by university, which ranged from 7.8% to 60.0%, with an overall response rate of 27.2%. This yielded 15,248 students who completed the survey.1 Canadian Mennonite University 233 137 58.8% Capilano University 1,754 165 9.4% Carleton University 10,877 3,350 30.8% Concordia University of Edmonton 573 176 30.7% Dalhousie University 5,569 1,616 29.0% ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 8,261 642 7.8% Mount Royal University 4,205 1,264 30.1% Nipissing University 1,000 394 39.4% Redeemer University College 282 156 55.3% ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 1,000 600 60.0% The King's University 259 133 51.4% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 1,000 299 29.9% Trinity Western University 859 288 33.5% Université de Moncton 1,862 637 34.2% University of Lethbridge 1,000 387 38.7% University of New Brunswick (Fredericton) 1,000 331 33.1% University of New Brunswick (Saint ▇▇▇▇) 883 290 32.8% University of Regina 3,000 1,065 35.5% University of Saskatchewan 1,500 362 24.1% University of the Fraser Valley 2,069 596 28.8% University of Victoria 1,000 295 29.5% University of Winnipeg 2,644 825 31.2% Vancouver Island University 1,682 452 26.9% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 3,522 788 22.4% Total 56,034 15,248 27.2% 1 PRA defined a completed survey as one on which a student answered up to the Living Arrangements section (approximately 80% of the questions).

Response rates. Table 2 shows the response rates by university, which ranged from 12.9% to 65.3%, with an overall response rate of 29.1%. This yielded 14,760 students who completed the survey.1 Cape Breton University 360 141 39.2% Capilano University 704 91 12.9% Carleton University 3,000 812 27.1% Concordia University 4,929 1313 26.6% Concordia University of Edmonton 351 124 35.3% Dalhousie University 1,515 449 29.6% Lakehead University 1,000 472 47.2% MacEwan University 2,247 706 31.4% McMaster University 5,590 988 17.7% Mount Royal University 841 385 45.8% Nipissing University 765 328 42.9% Redeemer University 90 46 51.1% Ryerson University 5,119 1636 32.0% Saint Mary's University 652 166 25.5% ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 1,000 634 63.4% The King's University 167 109 65.3% Trent University 1,000 282 28.2% Trinity Western University 261 136 52.1% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ 41.3% University of King's College 108 52 48.1% University of Lethbridge 1,000 425 42.5% University of Manitoba 1,803 581 32.2% University of New Brunswick Fredericton 828 303 36.6% University of New Brunswick Saint ▇▇▇▇ 242 76 31.4% University of Ottawa 6000 1411 23.5% University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ 987 372 37.7% University of Saskatchewan 1,000 249 24.9% University of the Fraser Valley 1,024 179 17.5% University of Victoria 1,000 339 33.9% University of Waterloo 2,000 744 37.2% University of Winnipeg 1,076 285 26.5% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University 3,416 664 19.4% 1 PRA defined a completed survey as student who answered up to the Living Arrangements section (approximately 80% of the questions).

Response rates. In order to produce annual health care estimates for calendar year 2016 based on the full MEPS sample data from the MEPS Panel 20 and Panel 21, the two panels are combined. More specifically, full calendar year 2016 data collected in Rounds 3 through 5 for the MEPS Panel 20 sample are pooled with data from the first three rounds of data collection for the MEPS Panel 21 sample (the general approach is described below). As mentioned above, all response rates discussed here are unweighted. To understand the calculation of MEPS response rates, some features related to MEPS data collection should be noted. When an RU is visited for a round of data collection, changes in RU membership are identified. Such changes include the formation of student RUs as well as other new RUs created when RU members from a previous round have moved to another location in the U.S. Thus, the number of RUs eligible for MEPS interviewing in a given round is determined after data collection is fully completed. The ratio of the number of RUs completing the MEPS interview in a given round to the number of RUs characterized as eligible to complete the interview for that round represents the “conditional” response rate for that round expressed as a proportion. It is “conditional” in that it pertains to the set of RUs characterized as eligible for MEPS for that round and thus is “conditioned” on prior participation rather than representing the overall response rate through that round. For example, in Table 3.1, for Panel 21 Round 2 the ratio of 7,319 (Row G) to 7,870 (Row F) multiplied by 100 represents the response rate for the round (93.0 percent when computed), conditioned on the set of RUs characterized as eligible for MEPS for that round. Taking the product of the percentage of the NHIS sample eligible for MEPS (Row A) with the product of the ratios for a consecutive set of MEPS rounds beginning with Round 1 produces the overall response rate through the last MEPS round specified. The overall unweighted response rate for the combined sample of Panel 20 and Panel 21 for 2016 was obtained by computing the products of the relative sample sizes and the corresponding overall panel response rates and then summing the two products. Panel 21 represents about 49.0 percent of the combined sample size while Panel 20 represents the remaining 51.0 percent. Thus, the combined response rate of 46.0 percent was computed as 0.510 times 45.7, the overall Panel 20 response rate through Round 5 plus 0.490...

Response rates. [To come]

Response rates. The NCSC report summarizes response rates.17 Briefly, case data forms were returned in 358 of the 401 cases, an 89 percent response rate. Judges com- pleted 366 (91 percent response rate) questionnaires. Although confiden- tiality precludes us from linking the data in a particular case to an individual judge, we are confident that a substantial number of judges are represented in the sample. For example, in Maricopa County, 29 judges sat in the crim- inal division in fiscal year 2000–2001.18 There were 576 total attorney questionnaires (either defense or pros- ecution) completed in 351 cases. At least one attorney responded in 88 percent of the cases and the prosecutor and defense counsel both responded in 64 percent of the cases. At least one defense attorney completed a form in 278 cases (69 percent response rate) and at least one prosecuting attor- ney in 287 cases (72 percent response rate). Overall, 3,626 jurors returned their questionnaires. The response rate for jurors across all sites, with con- sideration for jury size, was 80 percent. For the 12-person juries in Los Angeles, Maricopa, the Bronx, and DC, the average response rate was 11, 10, 8, and 10 jurors, respectively. For the eight-person juries in Maricopa,19 an average of seven jurors responded. The case data form surveys asked factual information about the criminal charges filed and the jury’s decision,20 17Id. at 32. 18Email from Judge ▇. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Jan. 26, 2004. See also note 61 infra. 19In California, New York, and DC, felony cases are tried to a 12-person jury. Arizona law pro- vides for eight-person juries in felony trials unless the penalty for the defendant includes death or a potential sentence of 30 years or more, in which case the number of jurors is 12. In Maricopa County, there were 30 cases with 12-member juries. Sixty-nine juries had eight members. In addition, there were six cases with so little information that jury size could not be determined. 20If this key information was missing from the questionnaires, NCSC made follow-up inquiries with the courts. Thirty-one cases without a case data form were salvaged through direct com- munication with the courts to obtain the key information about the case. The courts were unable to recover this missing information in 12 cases, which were not included in the final and led to 382 usable cases. The number of questionnaires included in the final usable database varied slightly for each site and are summarized ...