REQUESTED RELIEF. Promptly, and in any event, within ten (10) days of the date hereof, the Buyer shall prepare and submit to the Chief Accountant of the Division of Corporation Finance of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a request (“Buyer’s Request Letter”) for a letter from the SEC staff expressing no objection to the Buyer’s use of the Abbreviated Financial Statements for purposes of Rule 3-05 of Regulation S-X (such letter expressing no objection, the “Requested Relief”). The Buyer shall provide the Seller and its designated Representatives with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the Buyer’s Request Letter and shall consider in good faith all comments provided to the Buyer in connection with such review. Each of the Parties shall (i) use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain (and in the case of the Seller, to assist the Buyer in obtaining) the Requested Relief and (ii) make any further information submissions pursuant to the SEC’s consideration of the Buyer’s Request Letter that may be reasonably necessary or advisable. Each of the Parties shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve any objections that may be asserted by the SEC with respect to the Requested Relief; provided that neither Party shall be required to initiate any Action in pursuit of the Requested Relief; and provided further that Buyer shall not be required to agree to any condition to the receipt of the Requested Relief that would reasonably be expected to significantly increase Buyer’s costs of preparing its public SEC reports. Each of the Parties shall promptly inform each other of any material communication received by such Party from the SEC regarding the Requested Relief (unless the provision of such information would (i) violate the provisions of any applicable laws or regulations or any confidentiality agreement or (ii) cause the loss of the attorney-client privilege with respect thereto).
REQUESTED RELIEF. The Parties request that the Settlement be certified to the Commission for its approval, and that the Commission approve the Settlement Agreement without condition or modification. In accordance with Section 3.1 of the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Agreement will have an effective date of June 1, 2020 upon issuance of an order approving this Settlement Agreement without modification or condition, or if the Commission issues an order conditioning or modifying the Settlement Agreement, sixteen days after such order if no Party gives notice of termination pursuant to Section
REQUESTED RELIEF. The Settling Parties request that the Settlement be certified to the Commission for its approval, and that the Commission approve the Settlement Agreement without condition or 4 See 18 C.F.R §§ 35.2(e) and 385.2010(f)(3). 5 PJM already maintains, updates and regularly uses e-mail lists for all PJM members and affected state commissions.
REQUESTED RELIEF. On December 21, 2023, Edwardsville initiated this Cause by filing a Petition with the Commission requesting authority for approval to adjust its rates and charges.
REQUESTED RELIEF. The Settling Parties request that the Settlement be certified to the Commission for its approval, and that the Commission approve the Settlement Agreement without condition or modification. In accordance with Section 3.3(b) of the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Agreement will become effective upon issuance of an order approving this Settlement Agreement without modification or condition, or if the Commission issues an order conditioning or modifying the Settlement Agreement, sixteen days after such order if no Settling Party gives notice of termination pursuant to Section 3.3(b) of the Settlement Agreement. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Respectfully submitted,
REQUESTED RELIEF. On June 14, 2018, the Commission entered its original Order in the above captioned matter. Among other things, CSX Transportation (CSX) and the City of Newman (City) were required to: upgrade existing automatic warning devices at Broadway Street to add gates; upgrade existing crossbuck/YIELD signs with new automatic warning devices featuring gates at King Street; and, construct curbing to allow proper placement of the automatic warning devices at both Broadway Street and King Street, all in Xxxxxx. All work was to be completed on or before June 14, 2019. On July 11, 2018, CSX filed a Progress Report. On November 5, 2018, CSX filed Form 3 Petitions for approval of signal plans for each crossing. On November 7, 2018, Staff of the Commission’s Railroad Safety Section (Staff) approved CSX’s signal plans and issued X-Resolutions for CSX to move ahead with construction. On January 28, 2019, CSX and the Decatur & Eastern Illinois Railroad, LLC (D&E) jointly filed a Supplemental Petition in this docket. The Supplemental Petition stated that D&E has assumed control of the segment of railroad that includes the subject crossings in this docket. D&E also accepted and assumed all of CSX’s remaining obligations pursuant to the Stipulated Agreement and original Order in this docket. CSX and D&E are jointly requesting a Supplemental Order to make clear that D&E is now responsible for all remaining obligations previously assigned to CSX by the Stipulated Agreement and original Order in this docket. CSX and D&E also desire a directive in the Supplemental Order for each of them to be reimbursed individually from the Grade Crossing Protection Fund (GCPF) for 95% of their respective costs. First Supplemental CSX has already completed the work of designing and obtaining approval of the new automatic warning devices and will proceed to submit a final bill to the GCPF to close out their portion of the project. D&E will seek direct reimbursement from the GCPF for 95% of the signal installation costs. D&E will be responsible for all of the costs and work to maintain the new automatic warning devices and circuitry. An informal request for a six (6) month time extension was also received from D&E on May 22, 2019, due to D&E experiencing delay in coordinating with the City on the curbing and obtaining the engineering CAD files for the approved signal design from CSX. Staff believes that it is fair and reasonable to grant CSX and D&E the relief sought in their Joint Petition. Staff als...
REQUESTED RELIEF. 31. Plaintiff requests that this Court:
REQUESTED RELIEF. 4. Forthwith following the Effective Date, Kingston Westspur and Secure will jointly submit to the Commission the request for review and variance of the Order in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which includes a request to withdraw, cancel, terminate or otherwise cease the R&V Application ("Requested Relief"), and will cooperate to obtain a decision from the Commission that is not an Adverse Decision ("Favourable Decision").
REQUESTED RELIEF. The Settling Parties request that the Settlement Agreement be certified to the Commission for its approval, and that the Commission approve the Settlement Agreement without condition or modification. In accordance with Section 2.3 of the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Agreement will become effective upon issuance of an order approving the Settlement Agreement without modification, or 15 days after Commission approval with modifications not objected to by any Settling Party or Non-Opposing Party; or earlier if the Commission approves interim rate relief subject to the final disposition of this Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement further provides that the cost allocation provided for herein will be allocated during the current annual formula rate periods of ComEd and BGE, with any necessary reconciliation adjustments to be completed no later than the May/June 2018 billing cycle of the BGE and ComEd formula rate update postings, respectively. Refunds to the ComEd zone will be effectuated for any overpayments between May 1, 2017 and the effective date of the Settlement Agreement within 30 days of receipt of payment. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. By: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Its: Assistant General Counsel 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Audubon, Pennsylvania 19403 000-000-0000 xxxxxxx.xxxxx@xxx.xxx Exelon Corporation, for itself and on behalf of ComEd and BGE By: /s/ Xxxx X. Xxx Xxxx X. Xxx Its: Assistant General Counsel 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, X.X., Xxxxx 0000 Washington, D.C. 20068 000-000-0000 Xxxx.x.xxx@xxx.xxx Illinois Commerce Commission By: /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxx-Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx-Xxxx, General Counsel Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Its: Special Assistant Attorneys General 000 X. XxXxxxx St., Suite C-800 Chicago, IL 60601 000-000-0000 Xxxxxx.Xxxxx-Xxxx@Xxxxxxxx.xxx Xxxxxx.Xxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx Xxxxxxxxx.Xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx cc: The Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Coffman, Presiding Settlement Judge All Parties UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ) Docket No. ER17-1016- EXPLANATORY STATEMENT The Settling Parties submit this Explanatory Statement in support of the Settlement Agreement submitted herewith, resolving all issues set for hearing in the above-captioned proceeding. As set forth in the Settlement Agreement, the Settling Parties are PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (“PJM”), the Illinois Commerce Commission, and Exelon Corporation on behalf of Commonwealth Edison Company (“ComE...
REQUESTED RELIEF. The Settling Parties request that the Settlement be certified to the Commission for its approval, and that the Commission approve the Settlement Agreement without condition or modification. In accordance with Section 3.1 of the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Agreement will have an effective date of September 1, 2022 upon issuance of an order approving this Settlement Agreement without modification or condition, or if the Commission issues an 3 See 18 C.F.R §§ 35.2(e) and 385.2010(f)(3). 4 PJM already maintains, updates and regularly uses e-mail lists for all PJM members and affected state commissions. order conditioning or modifying the Settlement Agreement, fifteen days after such order if no Settling Party gives notice of termination pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Settlement Agreement. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Respectfully submitted, cc: Xxx. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx All Parties /s/ Xxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxx Counsel for Atlantic City Electric Company UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Atlantic City Electric Company Docket No. ER22-2200-000 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT The Settling Parties in this proceeding submit this Explanatory Statement in support of the enclosed Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement” or “Settlement”) that resolves Docket No. ER22-2200 and all sub-dockets thereto (the “Proceeding”). As set forth in the Settlement Agreement, the Settling Parties are Atlantic City Electric Company (“ACE” or “Company”), New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (“NJ BPU”), New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel (“Rate Counsel”), and Public Power Association of New Jersey (“PPANJ”) (each a “Settling Party” or “Party” and collectively the “Settling Parties” or “Parties”). 1
