Request for Classification Review Sample Clauses

Request for Classification Review. Step 1 If a significant change occurs in a position or classification that alters its duties or responsibilities in a manner that justifies a change in classification based on the principles underlying the Judiciary classification plan, the Court Administrator, the VSEA or the affected employee may request in writing that a classification review of the position occur to ascertain if it is assigned to the proper class. The request shall be submitted to the Human Resources Manager, and shall consist of a form containing the applicant’s name and other identifying and contact information, accompanied by a written statement of the facts upon which the applicant’s request is based, together with any documents supporting reclassification. The request shall be deemed filed on the date that it is received by the office of the Human Resources Manager. The VSEA may submit a class action request for classification review on behalf of employees in the same class, filing one (1) request that applies to the entire class.; Any employee within the affected class may elect via written notification to the Human Resources Manager not to have the results of the class review applicable to him/her until after such employee’s next step increase occurs. The Human Resources Manager or his/her designee shall conduct an analysis of the position or positions that are the subject of the request, based on the duties performed on the date the request was filed, gathering such information as is necessary to properly classify the position. The VSEA and/or the employee shall have the right to present documentary and other information to the Human Resources Manager, and shall have access to all information gathered by him/her, including participating in any site visit and the opportunity to hear any interviews or other oral statements, and shall be provided copies of any documents presented to or considered by the Human Resources Manager. Within 120 calendar days of filing of the request, the Human Resources Manager shall issue a written decision concerning the proper classification of the position(s), stating with specificity the facts and reasoning upon which the decision is based. The decision will be final on the thirtieth day following its receipt by the VSEA and the employee(s), unless the VSEA and/or the employee(s) file a request for reconsideration during that period.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Request for Classification Review. A. A Department Head may, at any time, submit a request to the Human Resources/Risk and Safety Manager for a review of an employee's position, setting forth the reasons for the request. The Human Resources/Risk and Safety Manager may conduct the review and make recommendations to the General Manager. All such requests may be acted upon within sixty (60) days of receipt. The decision of the General Manager shall be final without right of grievance or further hearing, except in cases where action by the Board of Directors' is required, in which case Board action shall be final.
Request for Classification Review. If the Union believes that assigned work has significantly changed for a specific individual or group of individuals within a position, the Union, or individual employee, may request a meeting to review whether the positions is in the correct classification. Should it be determined an employee has accreted additional work duties generally outside of their classification, the Employer and the Union will negotiate conditions of a reclassification for the incumbent employee. Within twenty (20) working days of the request of the review the Employer and the Union will meet to discuss. If the Union disagrees with the final decision regarding the proper classification for a job, the matter may be grieved.
Request for Classification Review. An employee and/or Departmental Head/Regional Manager who considers that the duties of the employees position have changed significantly since a previous review or appeal decision shall submit to the Human Resources Department revised position description/questionnaire and a request for review. The request for review shall be in writing and shall contain a statement of the reasons for the review request. Upon receipt by the Human Resources Department, of a request for classification review prepared and submitted in accordance with these procedures, the employee and the employee's Departmental Head/Regional Manager will be notified of the pending review.
Request for Classification Review. Is pursuant to Article 14 of the MLA, 3 except as modified below.
Request for Classification Review. A Department Director may initiate an informal classification review each year at the annual performance evaluation of the employee. If this classification review results in a department director suggesting formal review of the classification the Director will notify Human Resources to initiate a further review. If the reclassification review is not recommended by the Department Head, the employee may initiate a reclassification review request by submitting the County Desk Audit/ Reclassification review form to the Department Head and Human Resources within (thirty) 30 days after the annual performance review. Human Resources shall consider the comments from the employee, the supervisor, and the Department Head to determine if there is a need to conduct a classification review. A classification review will be processed as soon as practicable, however will not exceed (sixty) 60 days. The County may extend for reasonable circumstances. (*note: All days in this article are calendar days.) The reclassification request form will be available on the County’s intranet.

Related to Request for Classification Review

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Contractor Certification Regarding Ethics The Contractor certifies that the Contractor is now, and shall remain, in compliance with Chapter 42.52 RCW, Ethics in Public Service, throughout the term of this Contract.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts, design-build contracts, subcontracts, lower-tier subcontracts, purchase orders, lease agreements, consultant contracts or any other covered transaction requiring FHWA approval or that is estimated to cost $25,000 or more – as defined in 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200.

  • Texas Education Code Chapter 22 Contractor Certification for Contractor Employees Introduction Texas Education Code Chapter 22 requires entities that contract with school districts to provide service s to obtain criminal history record information regarding covered employees. Contractors must certify to the district t hat they have complied. Covered employees with disqualifying criminal histories are prohibited from serving at a sch ool district. Definitions: Covered employees: Employees of a contractor or subcontractor who have or will have continuing dutie s related to the service to be performed at the District and have or will have direct contact with students. The District will be the final arbiter of what constitutes direct contact with students. Disqualifying criminal history: Any conviction or other criminal history information designated by the District, or one of the following offenses, if at the time of the o ffense, the victim was under 18 or enrolled in a public school: (a) a felony offense under Title 5, Texas Penal Code; (b) an offense for which a defendant is required to register as a sex offender under Chapter 62, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure; or (c) an equivalent offense under federal law or the laws of another state. I certify that: NONE (Section A) of the employees of Contractor and any subcontractors are covered employees, as defined abo ve. If this box is checked, I further certify that Contractor has taken precautions or imposed conditions to ensure tha t the employees of Contractor and any subcontractor will not become covered employees. Contractor will maintain t hese precautions or conditions throughout the time the contracted services are provided. OR SOME (Section B) or all of the employees of Contractor and any subcontractor are covered employees. If this box is checked, I further certify that: (1) Contractor has obtained all required criminal history record information regarding its covered employees. None of the covered employees has a disqualifying criminal history. (2) If Contractor receives information that a covered employee subsequently has a reported criminal history, Contra ctor will immediately remove the covered employee from contract duties and notify the District in writing within 3 busi ness days. (3) Upon request, Contractor will provide the District with the name and any other requested information of covered employees so that the District may obtain criminal history record information on the covered employees. (4) If the District objects to the assignment of a covered employee on the basis of the covered employee's criminal h istory record information, Contractor agrees to discontinue using that covered employee to provide services at the District. Noncompliance or misrepresentation regarding this certification may be grounds for contract termination. None Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 Requirements as of 9-1-2017 SB 807 prohibits construction contracts to have provisions requiring the contract to be subject to the laws of anothe r state, to be required to litigate the contract in another state, or to require arbitration in another state. A contract wit h such provisions is voidable. Under this new statute, a “construction contract” includes contracts, subcontracts, or agreements with (among others) architects, engineers, contractors, construction managers, equipment lessors, or materials suppliers. “Construction contracts” are for the design, construction, alteration, renovation, remodeling, or repair of any building or improvement to real property, or for furnishing materials or equipment for the project. The t erm also includes moving, demolition, or excavation. BY RESPONDING TO THIS SOLICITATION, AND WHEN APPLI CABLE, THE PROPOSER AGREES TO COMPLY WITH THE TEXAS BUSINESS AND COMMERCE CODE § 272 WH EN EXECUTING CONTRACTS WITH TIPS MEMBERS THAT ARE TEXAS GOVERNMENT ENTITIES. 7 5 Texas Government Code 2270 Verification Form Texas Government Code 2270 Verification Form Texas 2017 House Xxxx 89 has been signed into law by the governor and as of September 1, 2017 will be codified as Texas Government Code § 2270 and 808 et seq. The relevant section addressed by this form reads as follows: Texas Government Code Sec. 2270.002. PROVISION REQUIRED IN CONTRACT. A governmental entity may not ent er into a contract with a company for goods or services unless the contract contains a written verification from the c ompany that it: (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract.engaged by ESC Region 8/The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS) 0000 Xxxxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx,XX,00000 verify by this writing that the above-named company affirms that it (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycot t Israel during the term of this contract, or any contract with the above-named Texas governmental entity in the futur e. I further affirm that if our company’s position on this issue is reversed and this affirmation is no longer valid, that t he above-named Texas governmental entity will be notified in writing within one (1) business day and we understand that our company’s failure to affirm and comply with the requirements of Texas Government Code 2270 et seq. shall be grounds for immediate contract termination without penalty to the above-named Texas governmental entity. AND our company is not listed on and we do not do business with companies that are on the the Texas Comptroller of Pu blic Accounts list of Designated Foreign Terrorists Organizations per Texas Gov't Code 2270.0153 found at xxxxx://x xxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxxxx/xxxx/xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx.xxx I swear and affirm that the above is true and correct. YES

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Client Classification 7.1. We shall not have an obligation to treat our clients in different classes depending on their knowledge and expertise.

  • Project Administration Designation Pursuant to Paragraph (B) of Rule 164-1-21 of the Administrative Code, the Recipient shall designate its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Fiscal Officer and Project Manager in Appendix B of this Agreement. Changes in these designations must be made in writing.

  • Certification Regarding Debarment Party certifies under pains and penalties of perjury that, as of the date that this Agreement is signed, neither Party nor Party’s principals (officers, directors, owners, or partners) are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or excluded from participation in Federal programs, or programs supported in whole or in part by Federal funds. Party further certifies under pains and penalties of perjury that, as of the date that this Agreement is signed, Party is not presently debarred, suspended, nor named on the State’s debarment list at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/purchasing/debarment

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.