Repeat Infringer Policy. Publisher may terminate a user’s access to the Publisher’s App(s) if, under appropriate circumstances, the user is determined to be a repeat infringer.
Repeat Infringer Policy. 4SPACES LTD’s intellectual property policy is to (i) remove or disable access, to the extent of 4SPACES LTD’s ability and control, material that 4SPACES LTD believes in good faith, upon notice from an intellectual property owner or their agent, is infringing the intellectual property of a third party by being made available through the Services, and (ii) remove or disable access to any User Content posted to or made available through the Services by “repeat infringers.” 4SPACES LTD considers a “repeat infringer” to be any user that has uploaded User Content to or through the Services and for whom 4SPACES LTD has received more than two takedown notices compliant with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) with respect to such User Content. 4SPACES LTD has discretion, however, to terminate the account of any user, to the extent 4SPACES LTD has such ability, after receipt of a single notification of claimed infringement or upon 4SPACES LTD’s own determination. Note, however, that 4SPACES LTD may not have an ongoing relationship with CamOn App Users following the download of the Application to a mobile device that enables 4SPACES LTD to block a user from uploading a CamOn Video to a Third Party Site.
Repeat Infringer Policy. Our intellectual property policy is to (i) remove or disable access to material that we believe in good faith, upon notice from an intellectual property owner or his or her agent, is infringing the intellectual property of a third party by being made available through the Services; and
Repeat Infringer Policy. The class plaintiffs briefly argue that YouTube failed to comply with the requirements of ß 512(i), which conditions safe harbor eligibility on the service provider having "adopted and reasonably implemented . . . a policy that provides for the termination in appropriate circumstances of subscribers and account holders of the service provider's system or network who are repeat infringers." 17 U.S.C. ß 512(i)(1)(A). Specifically, the class plaintiffs allege that YouTube "deliberately set up its identification tools to try to avoid identifying infringements of class plaintiffs' works." This allegation rests primarily on the assertion that YouTube permitted only designated "partners" to gain access to content identification tools by which YouTube would conduct network searches and identify infringing material.14
Repeat Infringer Policy. Code Ocean’s intellectual property policy is to (i) remove or disable access to material that Code Ocean believes in good faith, upon notice from an intellectual property owner or his or her agent, is infringing the intellectual property of a third party by being made available on the Site; and (ii) remove any User Content Posted by “repeat infringers.” Code Ocean considers a “repeat infringer” to be any User that has uploaded User Content to the Site and for whom Code Ocean has received more than two takedown notices compliant with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 512 with respect to such User Content. Code Ocean has discretion, however, to terminate the Account of any User after receipt of a single notification of claimed infringement or upon Code Ocean’s own determination.
Repeat Infringer Policy. HeartB’s intellectual property policy is to: (i) remove or disable access to material that HeartB believes in good faith, upon notice from an intellectual property owner or his or her agent, is infringing the intellectual property of a third party by being made available through the Service; and (ii) remove any User Content uploaded to the Service by any Repeat Infringer. However, HeartB can terminate the Account of any User after receipt of a single notification of claimed infringement or upon XxxxxX’s own determination.
Repeat Infringer Policy. Our Service Provider has adopted a policy of terminating, in appropriate circumstances and at Our Service Provider's sole discretion, members who are deemed to be repeat infringers. Our Service Provider may also at its sole discretion limit access to the services and/or terminate the memberships of any users who infringe any intellectual property rights of others or breach of applicable laws, whether or not there is any repeat infringement or violation. We disclaim any liability attributable to Our Service Provider‟s judgment in this regards.
Repeat Infringer Policy. BDP’s intellectual property policy is to: (i) remove or disable access to material that BDP believes in good faith, upon notice from an intellectual property owner or his or her agent, is infringing the intellectual property of a third party by being made available through the Site; (ii) remove any User Content Submitted by Users who are determined to be “repeat infringers”; and (iii) promptly terminate the Accounts of repeat infringers. BDP currently considers a “repeat infringer” to be any User that has Submitted User Content and for whom BDP has received more than two takedown notices compliant with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 512 with respect to such User Content. BDP has discretion, however, to terminate the Account of any User after receipt of a single Notification of Claimed Infringement (as defined in Section 5.a) or upon BDP’s own determination.
Repeat Infringer Policy. In accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) and other applicable law, Mother has adopted a policy of terminating, in appropriate circumstances and at our discretion, account holders who are deemed to be repeat infringers. We also may, at our discretion, limit access to our Services and terminate the accounts of any users who infringe any intellectual property rights of others, whether or not there is any repeat infringement.
Repeat Infringer Policy. In accordance with the Copyright Act and other applicable law (as may be amended from time to time), Xxxxx has adopted a policy of terminating, in appropriate circumstances and at Xxxxx's sole discretion, users who are deemed to be repeat infringers. Piiva may also at its sole discretion limit access to the Service and/or terminate the memberships of any users who infringe any intellectual property rights of others, whether or not there is any repeat infringement.
