Regulatory Flexibility. 1. The Parties recognize the importance of relying on competitive market forces to provide a wide choice in the supply of telecommunications services.
Regulatory Flexibility. The Secretary of Commerce and Trade and VEDP acknowledge that a key component of the long-term success of the Facility, as well as the Commonwealth as a whole, will be the Commonwealth’s ability to xxxxxx an innovative economy. Therefore, the Secretary of Commerce and Trade and VEDP will actively encourage the Commonwealth’s regulatory authorities to implement forward-looking regulatory frameworks that, to the extent appropriate: (i) increase consumer choice and allow new and innovative forms of technologies and services to enter the marketplace; (ii) reassess existing laws and regulations to assure they are not unduly harming innovation and competition in pursuit of their objectives; (iii) are performance-based and technology neutral; (iv) limit prescriptive conditions on the design and operation of new technologies or devices; and (v) support environmentally-sustainable technologies and cost-competitive renewable energy.
Regulatory Flexibility. This section is primarily intended to describe the enhanced regulatory flexibility provided under the Project XL pilot. This document discusses all Federal and State flexibility believed to be necessary to achieve the goals of this project. The parties do not anticipate the need to waive any additional State requirements, but if such action is necessary, it will be contained in the Minnesota XL permit which will be subject to public notice and comment.
Regulatory Flexibility. Information pertaining to conformance with this ENVVEST criteria is contained in the preceding section. Additionally it should be noted that the 10 tons per year or more of ozone precursor emission reductions that will result from the implementation of this ENVVEST initiative is achieved by exceeding the requirements of existing rules and regulations. For example, boilers selected to participate will be modified to exceed current operating and regulatory efficiency thresholds. These specific reductions achieved through the utilization of innovative technology will be permanent and will not be used as a bankable emission credit for further growth at Xxxxxxxxxx AFB. However, tThis does not prohibit a net emission increase at Vandenberg. However; if Vandenberg is required to undergo a mission change or additional missions are added to the facility, and growth offsets are required to accommodate these mission changes, then such offsets must be obtained from through projects which are not part of the ENVVEST air initiative or must be acquired by the Air Force from qualified areas or sources outside Vandenberg.4 (This is an issue for further discussion. What about offsets currently in AF possession?)
Regulatory Flexibility. The following describes the five key areas of regulatory flexibility for the Xxxxxx County Community XL Project pilot.
Regulatory Flexibility. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental jurisdictions. This rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the state is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Moreover, due to the nature of the federal-state relationship under the Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 000 X.X. 000, 255–66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
Regulatory Flexibility. For those sectors where DEP will be seeking flexibility for federal regulations and/or policies to ensure smooth and efficient ERP implementation, DEP and EPA will develop sector-specific addenda to this FPA, which will identify the needed flexibility. See Attachment A for a list of the areas where DEP anticipates that it will be requesting flexibility for the drycleaning, and printing sectors. The inclusion of this list as part of this FPA does not constitute a formal request by DEP for regulatory flexibility, nor does it imply that EPA is granting any flexibility as part of this umbrella FPA. Requests for such flexibility will be addressed as part of the development of the sector-specific addenda outlined in Section V.
Regulatory Flexibility
