Reference Manual. 10The exception to this statement is the website of the HTE edition incorporated into the OED, which coins web addresses that identify lexical senses as well as categories. 11McCracken, ‘The Exploitation of Dictionary Data and Metadata’, p. 512. 12Ibid. 13Ibid., p. 511. projects have already successfully adopted it or are in the process of adopting it – merits its recommendation as digital form in which to share lexicographical resources.14 But what exactly is RDF/OWL and what are the characteristics attributed to this “standard formalism for information graphs”? RDF and OWL are fundamental standards within the Semantic Web.15 This Web is, in essence, one of linked data, built on top of a set of data standards and technologies that aim to add “well-defined meaning” to information.16 These standards and technologies provide an “infrastructure for publishing, storing, retrieving, reusing, integrating, and analyzing data”.17 Its data form, open for anyone to use, is comprised of statements (or triples) that together form a network of information, one in which concepts are identified by IRIs (often in the form of web addresses or URLs).18 The use of IRIs allows for capturing and identifying data, reusing terminology defined elsewhere, and connecting information found in different digital resources. In effect, this identification mechanism enables thesaurus content to be reused, extended with custom labels and with links to other digital resources. These characteristics of the data form offer intrinsic support for many of the DWBP best practices and facilitate achieving the remaining ones. The underlying data format for Semantic Web information, RDF, is therefore mentioned explicitly in the DWBP documentation as highly suitable for publications on the Web. OWL provides an additional layer of expression that can be used on top of RDF for situations in which highly formal definitions and inferencing mechanisms are required.19 For more informal levels of expression, other Semantic Web standards, such as SKOS, are an alternative to OWL.20 Together, Semantic Web standards offer a well-defined formalism for information graphs. Moreover, they are said to support the functionality desired of historical language thesauri as identified in Chapter 2, since the infrastructure of the Semantic Web allows data to be “retrieved, accessed, reused, and integrated in a meaningful way”.21 Perceived benefits in using this data form are mentioned by Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx et al.22 One o...
Reference Manual. For its facility, HBMS agrees to document in detail (e.g. in a reference manual), the methodologies used to determine the PM emission intensity as required by Section 9.1.
Reference Manual. For each of its facilities, Vale agrees to document in detail (e.g. in a reference manual), the methodologies used to determine the PM emission intensity and sulphur capture rate or sulphur dioxide mass emission limit as required by Section 9.1.
Reference Manual. For its facility, CEZinc agrees to document in detail (e.g. in a reference manual), the methodologies used to determine the PM emission intensity and sulphur capture rate as required by Section 9.1.
Reference Manual. For its facility, Teck agrees to document in detail (e.g. in a reference manual), the methodologies used to determine the PM emission intensity and sulphur capture rate as required by Section 9.1.
Reference Manual. For each of its facilities, Glencore agrees to document in detail (e.g. in a reference manual), the methodologies used to determine the PM emission intensity and sulphur capture rate as required by Section 9.1.
