Recommendations and comments Sample Clauses

Recommendations and comments. Recommendations regarding the Aboriginal Site, e.g. whether the site is: a place of importance or significance where persons of Aboriginal descent have, or appear to have left any object used for or made or adapted for use for any purpose connected with traditional cultural life of Aboriginal people (past or present); and/or a sacred/ ritual or ceremonial site of importance and special significance to persons of Aboriginal descent; and/or a place of historical, anthropological, archaeological or ethnographic importance and/or significance; and/or a place where Aboriginal objects are traditionally stored; and recommendations for how the Aboriginal Site(s) should be protected. Schedule 7 — DPLH Heritage Information Submission Form (Clause 12.5 Provision of Aboriginal Heritage Information to DPLH) Complete and submit the form entitled 'Heritage Information Submission Form' that is available on the DPLH website (xxx.XXXX.xx.xxx.xx): Schedule 8 — Noongar Standard Heritage Process Information (Clause 12.6 Provision of Survey Information to DPLH) SWALSC will report the following information to DPLH: Details of the person filling in this form and the Agreement Group SWALSC is acting on behalf of Name: Job Title: Name of Agreement Group SWALSC is acting on behalf of: About the Proponent Proponent Name: Contact phone number: Brief summary of the project or activity: Does the Project also fall within one or more Related Agreement Areas: Y/N Please list any affected Related Agreement Group: Activity Notice Did the Activity Notice contain all requisite information (As per Schedule 4): Y/N If not did SWALSC: Utilise the Default Provisions: Request a new notice: When considering whether or not a survey was required did SWALSC seek advice from the DPLH: Survey Select the survey methodology used: Site ID/Site Avoidance Composition of the Survey Team Name of the Aboriginal Heritage Service Provider: Name of the Principal Aboriginal Heritage Consultant: Number of paid Aboriginal Consultants (If more than eight, detail why): Number of additional (unpaid) Aboriginal Consultants (detail why there was additional Consultants): Was an Aboriginal Heritage Liaison Officer appointed: Y/N Was an additional anthropologist/archaeologist or heritage specialist appointed: Were there any proponent nominees on the survey team: Survey Reporting If Preliminary Advice was requested was it received by SWALSC within the time period of 5 days after the last day of fieldwork: Did SWALSC provide an...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (32)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Recommendations and comments. Recommendations regarding the Aboriginal Site, e.g. whether the site is: a place of importance or significance where persons of Aboriginal descent have, or appear to have left any object used for or made or adapted for use for any purpose connected with traditional cultural life of Aboriginal people (past or present); and/or a sacred/ ritual or ceremonial site of importance and special significance to persons of Aboriginal descent; and/or a place of historical, anthropological, archaeological or ethnographic importance and/or significance; and/or a place where Aboriginal objects are traditionally stored; and recommendations for how the Aboriginal Site(s) should be protected. Schedule 7 — DPLH Heritage Information Submission Form (Clause 12.5 Provision of Aboriginal Heritage Information to DPLH) Complete and submit the form entitled 'Heritage Information Submission Form' that is available on the DPLH website (xxx.XXXX.xx.xxx.xx). Schedule 8 — Noongar Standard Heritage Process Information (Clause 12.6 Provision of Survey Information to DPLH) The RC will report the following information to DPLH: Details of the person filling in this form Name: Job Title: Noongar Corporation Name: About the Proponent Proponent Name: Contact phone number: Brief summary of the project or activity: Does the Project fall within more than one Regional Noongar Corporation’s agreement area: Y/N Please list any other affected Regional Corporation: Activity Notice Did the Activity Notice contain all requisite information (As per Schedule 4): Y/N If not did the Regional Corporation: Utilise the Default Provisions:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
Recommendations and comments. Recommendations regarding the Aboriginal Site, e.g. whether the site is: a place of importance or significance where persons of Aboriginal descent have, or appear to have left any object used for or made or adapted for use for any purpose connected with traditional cultural life of Aboriginal people (past or present); and/or
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Recommendations and comments. Recommendations regarding the Aboriginal Site, e.g. whether the site is: a place of importance or significance where persons of Aboriginal descent have, or appear to have left any object used for or made or adapted for use for any purpose connected with traditional cultural life of Aboriginal people (past or present); and/or a sacred/ ritual or ceremonial site of importance and special significance to persons of Aboriginal descent; and/or a place of historical, anthropological, archaeological or ethnographic importance and/or significance; and/or a place where Aboriginal objects are traditionally stored; and recommendations for how the Aboriginal Site(s) should be protected. Schedule 7 — DAA Heritage Information Submission Form (Clause 12.5 Provision of Aboriginal Heritage Information to DAA) Complete and submit the form entitled 'Heritage Information Submission Form' that is available on the DAA website (xxx.xxx.xx.xxx.xx): Schedule 8 — Noongar Standard Heritage Process Information (Clause 12.6 Provision of Survey Information to DAA) SWALSC will report the following information to DAA: Details of the person filling in this form and the Agreement Group SWALSC is acting on behalf of Name: Job Title: Name of Agreement Group SWALSC is acting on behalf of: About the Proponent Proponent Name: Contact phone number: Brief summary of the project or activity: Does the Project also fall within one or more Related Agreement Areas: Y/N Please list any affected Related Agreement Group: Activity Notice Did the Activity Notice contain all requisite information (As per Schedule 4): Y/N If not did SWALSC:
Sample 1
Recommendations and comments. Recommendations regarding the Aboriginal Site, e.g. whether the site is:
Sample 1
Recommendations and comments. Recommendations regarding the Aboriginal Site, e.g. whether the site is: a place of importance or significance where persons of Aboriginal descent have, or appear to have left any object used for or made or adapted for use for any purpose connected with traditional cultural life of Aboriginal people (past or present); and/or a sacred/ ritual or ceremonial site of importance and special significance to persons of Aboriginal descent; and/or a place of historical, anthropological, archaeological or ethnographic importance and/or significance; and/or a place where Aboriginal objects are traditionally stored. For each potential Aboriginal Site identified, please complete and attach a copy of the Heritage Information Submission Form
Sample 1

Related to Recommendations and comments

  • Recommendations It is recommended that:

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The demonstration and evaluation process provided an opportunity to test community specific tools with a range of end users from the memory institution domain and to gain greater insight into both the current and future evolution of the SHAMAN prototypes for preservation, access and re-use. Xxxx et al. (2000) in their user evaluation study of the Alexandria Digital Library which incorporated the evaluation of a Web prototype by earth scientists, information specialists and educators raised four key questions in relation to their findings that SHAMAN may be well advised to consider, they are paraphrased here with our conclusions from the investigations. What have we learned about our target organizations and potential users?  Memory institutions are most definitely not a homogenised group; their needs and requirements differ greatly across the domain.  Representatives of the archives community are agreed on the benefits of SHAMAN‟s authenticity validation function.  The representatives of government information services remained unconvinced as to the need or benefit of grid technologies or distributed ingest while librarians saw the value of grid access as an asset of the framework. What have we learned about the evaluation approach for digital preservation?  Within the limits of the exercise, in terms of time-frame and resources, the approach adopted has generated useful information for the further development of demonstrators and for the development of the SHAMAN framework overall. What have we learned about the SHAMAN ISP1 demonstrator?  Respondents to the evaluation questionnaires and the focus groups indicate that, overall, the presentation of the demonstrator worked effectively and that, in general, participants in the demonstration and evaluation events were able to understand the intentions of the demonstration and to apply the ideas presented to their own context. What have we learned about the applicability of the SHAMAN framework to memory institutions?  Respondents to the questionnaires and participants in the focus groups readily identified the value of the SHAMAN framework to their own operations. The majority had not yet established a long-term digital preservation policy, but recognized the need. Generally, the concepts of distributed ingest and grid operations found favour.  Virtually all practitioners in the focus groups, however, drew attention to need of a lower level demonstration that would be closer to their everyday preservation troubles, especially for digital preservation to be applied to non-textual materials, such as film, photographs and sound archives. In addition to the criteria suggested by Xxxx et al., we can add a further project-related question: What have we learned that has implications for the training and dissemination phase of the Project?  It was not part of the remit of the demonstration and evaluation specifically to discover information of relevance to the training and dissemination function. However, a number of factors will affect the efficacy of any training programme in particular. o First, no common understanding of digital preservation can be assumed of the potential target audiences for training. Consequently, it is likely that self-paced learning materials will be most effective in presenting the SHAMAN framework. o Secondly, the aims of SHAMAN as a project must be conveyed clearly: specifically, that it is a kind of „proof-of-concept‟ project and is not intended to deliver a package of programs capable of being implemented by institutions. o Thirdly, it needs to be emphasised that the SHAMAN framework is not limited to text documents; it can be applied to materials of all kinds. However, the demonstrations relate to bodies of material that were actually available for use. o Fourthly, the existing presentation materials are capable of being adapted for use in training activities. o Finally, the target audiences will appreciate the possibility of online access to the demonstrator, which will need to have very great ease of access in order that people with diverse backgrounds are able to use it with equal facility. We believe that, overall, WP14 has met its aims and objectives in this demonstration and evaluation of ISP1. Valuable lessons have been learnt by all parties involved, which will be transferred to the evaluation of ISP2 in the coming months.

  • Comments Licensee will ensure that neither libellous nor blasphemous language appears in the Comments and will be responsible for the removal of Comments.

  • Additional Comments By signing this permit I am stating that I have read it in its entirety and agree to comply with all applicable ordinances, resolutions and policies of the City of Hood River. CITY: APPLICANT: Director of Public Works Date Phone: 000-000-0000 Title: Phone: Email: Date Completed: _

  • Representations and Recommendations Unless otherwise stated in writing, neither Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc, nor its brokers or licensees have made, on their own behalf, any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to any element of the Property including but not limited to, the legal sufficiency, legal effect, or tax consequences of this transaction. Any information furnished by either party should be independently verified before that party relies on such information. Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc. recommends that Buyer consult its attorneys and accountants before signing this Agreement regarding the terms and conditions herein and that Seller satisfy itself as to the financial ability of Buyer to perform.

  • Suggestions We shall have a royalty-free, worldwide, transferable, sublicenseable, irrevocable, perpetual license to use or incorporate into the Services any suggestions, enhancement requests, recommendations or other feedback provided by You, including Users, relating to the operation of the Services.

  • Advice and Commentary 9.1. The Company will not advise the Client about the merits of a particular Order or give him any form of investment advice and the Client acknowledges that the Services do not include the provision of investment advice in Financial Instruments or the Underlying Markets or Underlying Assets. The Client alone will decide how to handle his Trading Account and place Orders and take relevant decisions based on his own judgment.

  • Recommendation The Sheriff recommends approval of the Board Order. The County Administrator concurs with the recommendation of the Sheriff. Should the Board of Commissioners concur with their recommendations, approval of the Board Order will implement that action. Respectfully submitted, /s/ XXXXX XXXXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxx County Administrator

  • Manufacturer's Recommendations All work or materials shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements, for its use at the Site in executing the Work, copies of bulletins, circulars, catalogues, or other publications bearing the manufacturer’s titles, numbers, editions, dates, etc. If the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements are not available, the Contractor shall request installation instructions from the Design Professional.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.