Receiver selectivity Sample Clauses

Receiver selectivity. The ITS receiver selectivity is specified in terms of the level of interfering signal consistent with a bit error ratio (BER) for the wanted signal of less than 10-3 before FEC. The interfering signal is assumed to be from a signal source with the ideal characteristics of the Internet FWA radio system, centered on the applicable adjacent channel. The wanted signal is assumed to be from a similar ideal source and set at a level 3 dB greater than the level required for BER = 10-3 in the absence of interference. The carrier to interference levels are as follows: ---------------------------------- ------------------------------- Channel Carrier/Interference ratio for BER = 10-3 ---------------------------------- ------------------------------- N <= 14.4 dB N +/- 1 <= -15.5 dB N +/- 2 <= -58.5 dB Any other channel <= -84.5 dBc ---------------------------------- -------------------------------
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Receiver selectivity. The ITS receiver selectivity is specified in terms of the level of interfering signal consistent with a bit error ratio (BER) for the wanted signal of less than 10-(3)
Sample 1Sample 2
Receiver selectivity. The RSS receiver selectivity is specified in terms of the level of interfering signal consistent with a bit error ratio (BER) for the wanted signal of less than 10-(3)
Sample 1Sample 2
Receiver selectivity. The RSS receiver selectivity is specified in terms of the level of interfering signal consistent with a bit error ratio (BER) for the wanted signal of less than 10–3 before FEC. The interfering signal is assumed to be from a signal source with the ideal characteristics of the Internet FWA radio system, centered on the applicable adjacent channel. The wanted signal is assumed to be from a similar ideal source and set at a level 3 dB greater than the level required for BER = 10–3 in the absence of interference. The carrier to interference levels are as follows: Channel Carrier/Interference ratio for BER = 10–3 N [*] N ± 1 [*] N ± 2 [*] N ± 3 [*] N ± 4 [*] N ± 5 [*] Any other channel Blocking specification applies Purchase and License Agreement for FWA Equipment
Sample 1
Receiver selectivity. The RSS receiver selectivity is specified in terms of the level of interfering signal consistent with a bit error ratio (BER) for the wanted signal of less than 10-3 before FEC. The interfering signal is assumed to be from a signal source with the ideal characteristics of the Internet FWA radio system, centered on the applicable adjacent channel. The wanted signal is assumed to be from a similar ideal source and set at a level 3 dB greater than the level required for BER = 10-3 in the absence of interference. The carrier to interference levels are as follows: ---------------------------------- ------------------------------- Channel Carrier/Interference ratio for BER = 10-3 ---------------------------------- ------------------------------- N [ * ] N +/- 1 [ * ] N +/- 2 [ * ] N +/- 3 [ * ] Note: Portions of this exhibit indicated by "[ * ]" are subject to a confidential treatment request, and have been omitted from this exhibit. Complete, unredacted copies of this exhibit have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Company's confidential treatment request. Annex D -Product Specifications Purchase and License Agreement for FWA Equipment-December 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------- Channel Carrier/Interference ratio for BER = 10-3 ---------------------------------- ------------------------------- N +/- 4 [ * ] N +/- 5 [ * ] Any other channel Blocking specification applies ---------------------------------- -------------------------------
Sample 1
Receiver selectivity. The ITS receiver selectivity is specified in terms of the level of interfering signal consistent with a bit error ratio (BER) for the wanted signal of less than 10–3 before FEC. The interfering signal is assumed to be from a signal source with the ideal characteristics of the Internet FWA radio system, centered on the applicable adjacent channel. The wanted signal is assumed to be from a similar ideal source and set at a level 3 dB greater than the level required for BER = 10–3 in the absence of interference. The carrier to interference levels are as follows: Channel Carrier/Interference ratio for BER = 10–3 N [*] N ± 1 [*] N ± 2 [*] Any other channel [*]
Sample 1

Related to Receiver selectivity

  • Supplier Selection If Customer selects a seat or galley supplier that is not on the Boeing recommended list, such seat or galley will become BFE and the provisions of Exhibit A, Buyer Furnished Equipment Provisions Document, of the AGTA will apply.

  • Virus Management Transfer Agent shall maintain a malware protection program designed to deter malware infections, detect the presence of malware within the Transfer Agent environment.

  • Acquisition Target Not Selected Prior to the date hereof, the Company has not selected any business combination target and has not, nor has anyone on its behalf, initiated any substantive discussions, directly or indirectly, with any business combination target.

  • SERVICE XXXX USE A. Controlled Affiliate recognizes the importance of a comprehensive national network of independent BCBSA licensees which are committed to strengthening the Licensed Marks and Name. The Controlled Affiliate further recognizes that its actions within its Service Area may affect the value of the Licensed Marks and Name nationwide.

  • Removal of General Partner (a) The Special Limited Partner or the Limited Partner, or both of them, may remove the General Partner for cause if such General Partner, its officers or directors, if applicable, has:

  • XXXREAS the Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the "1940 Act") as an open-end, series management investment company; and

  • Communications with Potential Business Combination Targets Prior to the date hereof, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf has, and as of the First Closing Date, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf will have selected any Business Combination target or initiated any substantive discussions, directly or indirectly, with any Business Combination target.

  • Review Systems; Personnel It will maintain business process management and/or other systems necessary to ensure that it can perform each Test and, on execution of this Agreement, will load each Test into these systems. The Asset Representations Reviewer will ensure that these systems allow for each Review Receivable and the related Review Materials to be individually tracked and stored as contemplated by this Agreement. The Asset Representations Reviewer will maintain adequate staff that is properly trained to conduct Reviews as required by this Agreement.

  • Corporate Treatment The Board shall use its reasonable best efforts to take such actions as are necessary or appropriate to preserve the status of the Company as a partnership for U.S. federal (and applicable state and local) income tax purposes. If, however, the Board determines, in its sole discretion, for any reason (including the proposal, formally or informally, of legislation that could affect the Company’s status as a partnership for U.S. federal and/or applicable state and local income tax purposes) that it is not in the best interests of the Company to be characterized as a partnership, the Board may take whatever steps, if any, are needed to cause the Company to be or confirm that the Company will be treated as an association or as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal (and applicable state and local) income tax purposes, including by making an election to be taxed as a “C” corporation pursuant to the Code (a “Change in Tax Classification”), without any approval or vote of the Members required, and to make such filings, including without limitation, a Form 8832 with the Service, and to undertake such actions as required to effect such Change in Tax Classification. At the time and following any Change of Tax Classification, the Board shall have the right, without any approval or vote of the Members being required, to amend this Agreement as reasonably required to effect the Change in Tax Classification and to provide for the operations of the Company following such event. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, in the event U.S. federal (and/or applicable state and local) income tax laws, rules or regulations are enacted, amended, modified or applied after the date hereof in such a manner as to require or necessitate that the Company no longer be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal (and/or applicable state and local) income tax purposes, then the first sentence of this Section 8.7 shall no longer apply.

  • Representation Method of Testing (i)(a) (i)

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.