Reassessment of the F006 Listing Sample Clauses

Reassessment of the F006 Listing. IBM is seeking a site specific reassessment of the application of the F006 RCRA listing, as defined in 40CFR261.31, to the rinsewaters generated by the semiconductor wafer copper plating process. The F006 RCRA listing states, “Wastewater treatment sludges from electroplating operations except from the following processes: (1) sulfuric acid anodizing of aluminum; (2) tin plating on carbon steel; (3) zinc plating (segregated basis) on carbon steel; (4) aluminum or zinc- aluminum plating on carbon steel; (5) cleaning/stripping associated with tin, zinc, and aluminum plating on carbon steel; and (6) chemical etching and milling of aluminum.” are F006 wastes. The documented hotline and compendium rulings. The F006 listing, as promulgated, was primarily focused on large scale plating operations used to plate large metal parts for the finished goods industry. These operations utilized plating and rinse baths consisting of hundreds or thousands of gallons of plating and rinsing solutions which typically processed large parts with extensive geometries. As parts moved from the plating bath to the rinse bath, they carried over significant quantities of plating solution into the rinsewaters, resulting in significant levels of metals in the wastewater treatment sludges. The copper plating process discussed in this application is very different than the electroplating that was performed twenty years ago. Perhaps most importantly, the chemicals used in IBM’s process do not contain the heavy metals, listed in Appendix VII to Part 261 (Basis for Listing Hazardous Waste) which were the focus of the original F006 definition. The plating process and equipment have also been engineered with negligible environmental impact in mind. The process has been designed to minimize the use of the chemical in the plating process and the quantity of chemical dragged out from the plating process to the rinse step. The quantity of copper released through the discharge of the rinsewaters (which is further discussed in this application) is negligible. The process has been developed to maximize the efficient use of the copper metal and minimize the release of the materials into the wastewater system.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Reassessment of the F006 Listing

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Periodic Risk Assessment Provider further acknowledges and agrees to conduct periodic risk assessments and remediate any identified security and privacy vulnerabilities in a timely manner.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following:

  • Self-Assessment (a) Subject to clause 4.4(b), for Services that are Self-Assessable:

  • ASSESSMENT REPORT Within 120 days following the general election held on November 2nd 2003, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister setting out relevant ways to improve the trial and addressing, in particular, the following points : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 2nd 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of ballot paper cards issued to the deputy returning officers and the number of ballot paper cards returned used and unused ; — the examination of rejected ballot papers, if it has been completed.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessments Xxxx shall provide reasonable assistance to Client with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with a Supervisory Authority, required under Data Protection Laws, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, Xxxx.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment and Prior Consultation Processor shall provide reasonable assistance to the Company with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with Supervising Authorities or other competent data privacy authorities, which Company reasonably considers to be required by article 35 or 36 of the GDPR or equivalent provisions of any other Data Protection Law, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Company Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, the Contracted Processors.

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors:

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.