RATING CRITERIA. Major factors/criteria for the establishment of a reduced candidate/shortlist and selection:
RATING CRITERIA. Great Extent The student demonstrates the practice behavior 90 to 100% of the time and does so with a high degree of competence reflective of generalist/advanced generalist level social work practice. Considerable Extent The student demonstrates the practice behavior 60 to 89% of the time and does so with a good degree of competence showing strong promise as a generalist/advanced generalist level social worker. Some Extent The student demonstrates the practice behavior 30 to 59% of the time and does so with some competence that with practice will likely improve to a considerable or great extent. Little or no Extent The student demonstrates the practice behavior less than 30% of the time or with very little competence and is unlikely to improve to a considerable extent even with practice. If this is marked, the behavior should be discussed with the Faculty Liaison. Honesty and accuracy in assessment is critical for meaningful professional development. We encourage both the student and field instructor to use these ratings to accurately capture where the student is in their development. School Social Work Performance Expectations
RATING CRITERIA. (a) The Initial Holder severally represents and warrants to the Issuer and the Indenture Trustee that, on the Closing Date, the Rating Criteria are satisfied with respect to it.
RATING CRITERIA. This item should be rated as a Strength if either of the following applies: • The answer to question A is Yes, and the answer to question B is Not Applicable. • The answer to question A is No, and the answer to question B is Yes. This item should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if either of the following applies: • The answer to question A is No, and the answer to question B is No. • The answer to question A is No, and the answer to question B is Not Applicable. Item 2 should be rated as Not Applicable if the response to the question of applicability is No. Item 2 Rating (select one): Strength Area Needing Improvement NA Provide any additional comments that highlight strengths or challenges related to specific practices, systemic issues, or resources that affected this item in the narrative field below: Override this rating? Overridden rating: Strength Area Needing Improvement NA Override reason: 14 Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument SAFETY OUTCOME 2: CHILDREN ARE SAFELY MAINTAINED IN THEIR HOMES WHENEVER POSSIBLE AND APPROPRIATE. Item 3: Risk and Safety Assessment and Management Purpose of Assessment: To determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to assess and address the risk and safety concerns relating to the child(ren) in their own homes or while in xxxxxx care.
RATING CRITERIA. Item 5 should be rated as a Strength if any one of the following criteria apply: • The answers to questions A3, B, and C are Yes or NA, and the answers to questions D and E are No. • The answers to questions A3, B, and C are Yes or NA, and D and F are Yes. • The answers to questions A3, B, and C are Yes or NA, the answer to question D is No, and the answers to questions E and F are Yes. • The answers to questions A3, B, and C are Yes or NA, the answer to question D or E is Yes, the answer to question F is No, and the answer to question G is Yes. Item 5 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if any of the following apply: • The answer to question A3, B, or C is No. • The answers to questions A3, B, and C are Yes or NA, but the answer to question D or E is Yes, and the answers to questions F and G are No. Item 5 should be rated as Not Applicable if the response to the question of applicability is No. Item 5 Rating (select one): Strength ❒ Area Needing Improvement ❒ NA ❒ Provide any additional comments that highlight strengths or challenges related to specific practices, systemic issues, or resources that affected this item in the narrative field below: Override this rating? ❒ Overridden rating: Strength ❒ Area Needing Improvement ❒ NA ❒ Override reason: Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument 31 Section II: Permanency Outcome 1 PERMANENCY OUTCOME 1: CHILDREN HAVE PERMANENCY AND STABILITY IN THEIR LIVING SITUATIONS. Item 6: Achieving Reunification, Guardianship, Adoption, or Other Planned Permanent Living Arrangement Purpose of Assessment: To determine whether concerted efforts were made, or are being made, during the period under review to achieve reunification, guardianship, adoption, or other planned permanent living arrangement.
RATING CRITERIA. Major factors/criteria for the establishment of a reduced candidate/shortlist and selection: CATEGORY Weight Assigned Key Staff/Project Team qualifications. 20% Firm resources/capability to accomplish proposed work on schedule, and experience on similar projects. 30% Project understanding/approach/services required. 20% Proposed pricing for title searches. The pricing structure shall be based on the assumption that no title insurance shall be requested and thus the fee paid for each service should be inclusive of all title search services, profit, and costs. 30% NOTE: Shortlist and Selection Committee membership appointments are confidential.
RATING CRITERIA. Item 1 should be rated as a Strength if either of the following applies: • The answers to A and B are zero. • The answers to A or B are greater than zero, but the answer to C is Yes. Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument 9 Item 1 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if the following applies: • The answer to A or B is greater than zero, and the answer to C is No. Item 1 should be rated as Not Applicable if the response to the question of applicability is No.
RATING CRITERIA. Article 3, Subsection 3.17(a)(8);
RATING CRITERIA. Practice: Criteria used for performance reviews have been developed to meet the expectations of the City of Lakewood staff throughout the organization. Job specific indicators have been determined by the Police Department for personnel assigned to the various units and sections.
RATING CRITERIA. Major factors/criteria for the establishment of a reduced candidate/shortlist and selection: CATEGORY Weight Assigned Key Staff/Project Team qualifications 30% Firm resources/capability to accomplish proposed work on schedule, and experience in; highway inspection services; and highway design services 25% Ability to provide required construction and maintenance inspection personnel on demand for each type of project and task 20% Project understanding/approach/services required 20% Completeness of submissions to include clarity, readability, and presentation of material 5%
