Quebec Action Sample Clauses

Quebec Action. Superior Siskinds X. Xxxxxx Xxx Denso Corporation, Denso All Persons in Quebec who, Court of Desmeules International America, Inc., Denso during the Class Period, (a) Quebec s.e.n.c.r.l. Manufacturing Canada, Inc., Denso purchased, directly or indirectly, (district of Sales Canada, Inc., Denso Windshield Wiper Systems; Québec), File International Korea Corporation, and/or (b) purchased or leased, No. 200-06- Denso Korea Automotive directly or indirectly, a new or 000161-136 Corporation, Korea Wiper Blade used Automotive Vehicle; and/or Co., Ltd., ASMO Co., Ltd., ASMO (c) purchased for import into North America, LLC, ASMO Canada, a new or used Greenville of North Carolina, Inc., Automotive Vehicle. Excluded Mitsuba Corporation, American Persons are excluded from the Mitsuba Corporation, Xxxxxx Quebec Settlement Class. Bosch GmbH, RBKB Bosch Electrical Drives Co., Ltd., Xxxxxx Xxxxx LLC and Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Inc. Court File No. CV-13-478180-00CP ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE THE HONOURABLE ) , THE DAY JUSTICE BELOBABA ) OF , 2019 BETWEEN: SHERIDAN CHEVROLET CADILLAC LTD., THE PICKERING AUTO MALL LTD., and XXXX XXXXXX - and - Plaintiffs DENSO CORPORATION, DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA INC., DENSO MANUFACTURING CANADA, INC., DENSO SALES CANADA, INC., DENSO INTERNATIONAL KOREA CORPORATION, DENSO KOREA AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, KOREA WIPER BLADE CO., LTD., ASMO CO., LTD., ASMO NORTH AMERICA, LLC, MITSUBA CORPORATION, AMERICAN MITSUBA CORPORATION, ASMO GREENVILLE OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX, RBKB, BOSCH ELECTRICAL DRIVES CO., LTD., XXXXXX XXXXX LLC, and XXXXXX XXXXX INC. Defendants Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 ORDER - Windshield Wiper Systems - - Mitsuba Notice Approval and Consent Certification - THIS MOTION made by the Plaintiffs for an Order approving the abbreviated, publication and long-form notices of settlement approval hearings and the method of dissemination of said notices, and certifying this proceeding as a class proceeding for settlement purposes as against Mitsuba Corporation and American Mitsuba Corporation (collectively, the “Settling Defendants”) was read this day at Osgoode Hall, 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx. ON READING the materials filed, including the settlement agreement with the Settling Defendants dated as of ⚫, 2019 attached to this Order as Schedule “A” (the “Settlement Agreement”), and on reading the submissions of counsel for the Plaintiffs and Counsel for the Settling Defendan...
Sample 1See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quebec Action. Superior Siskinds Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Denso Corporation, Denso All Persons in Quebec who, Court of Desmeules International America, Inc., Denso during the Class Period, (a) Quebec s.e.n.c.r.l. Manufacturing Canada, Inc., Denso purchased, directly or (district of Sales Canada, Inc., NGK Spark Plug indirectly, Oxygen Sensors; Québec), File Co., Ltd., NGK Spark Plug (U.S.A.) and/or (b) purchased or Xx. 000-00- Xxxxxxx, Xxx., NGK Spark Plug leased, directly or indirectly, 000177-140 (U.S.A.), Inc., NGK Spark Plug a new or used Automotive Canada Limited, Vehicle containing Oxygen Sensors; and/or (c) purchased for import into Canada, a new or used Automotive Vehicle containing Oxygen Sensors. Excluded Persons are excluded from the Quebec Settlement Class. Court and File No. Plaintiffs’ Counsel Plaintiff Defendants Settlement Class BC Action British Xxxxx Lawyers Xxxx Xxxx and NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd., NGK All Persons in British Columbia LLP Xxxx Xxx Spark Plugs Canada Limited, NGK Columbia who, during the Supreme Spark Plugs (U.S.A.), Inc., NTK Class Period, (a) purchased, Court File No. Technologies, Inc., Denso directly or indirectly, Oxygen S-155643 Corporation, Denso Manufacturing Sensors; and/or (b) purchased (Vancouver Canada, Inc., Denso Sales Canada, or leased, directly or Registry) Inc., Denso International America, indirectly, a new or used Inc., Xxxxxx Xxxxx XxxX, Xxxxxx Automotive Vehicle Bosch Inc., and Xxxxxx Xxxxx LLC containing Oxygen Sensors; and/or (c) purchased for import into Canada, a new or used Automotive Vehicle containing Oxygen Sensors. Excluded Persons are excluded from the BC Settlement Class. SCHEDULE “B” ONTARIO Court File No. CV-14-516006-00CP SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE THE HONOURABLE ) , THE DAY JUSTICE BELOBABA ) OF , 2019 BETWEEN: SHERIDAN CHEVROLET CADILLAC LTD., THE PICKERING AUTO MALL LTD., and XXXX XXXXXX - and - Plaintiffs DENSO CORPORATION, DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA INC., DENSO MANUFACTURING CANADA, INC., DENSO SALES CANADA, INC., DENSO PRODUCTS AND SERVICES AMERICAS, INC. (f/k/a DENSO SALES CALIFORNIA, INC.), DENSO AUTOMOTIVE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, NGK SPARK PLUG CO. LTD., NGK OXYGEN SENSORS (U.S.A.), INC., NGK OXYGEN SENSORS CANADA LIMITED, NGK SPARK PLUGS (U.S.A.), INC., NGK SPARK PLUGS CANADA LIMITED, NTK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX, XXXXXX XXXXX INC., and XXXXXX XXXXX LLC Defendants Proceeding under the Class Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxx, 0000, S.O. 1992, c. 6 ORDER - Oxygen Sensors - - NGK Notice Approval and Consent Certificatio...
Sample 1
Quebec Action. Superior Autolights Siskinds, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Koito Manufacturing All Persons in Quebec who, Did the Settling June 1,1997 to Court of Desmeules Co., Ltd., North during the Class Period, (a) Defendants, or any April 2, 2019. Quebec s.e.n.c.r.l American Lighting, Inc., purchased, directly or of them, conspire to (district of Ichikoh Industries, Ltd., indirectly, Autolights; and/or fix, raise, maintain, Québec), Xxxxxxx Electric Co., (b) purchased or leased, and/or stabilize the File No. Ltd., Xxxxxxx Electric directly or indirectly, a new prices of Autolights 200-06- U.S. Co., Inc., II Xxxxxxx or used Automotive Vehicle; in Canada and/or 000174- Co., Inc., Mitsuba and/or (c) purchased for elsewhere during the 147 Corporation and import into Canada, a new or Class Period? If so, American Mitsuba used Automotive Vehicle. what damages, if Corporation Excluded Persons are any, did Settlement excluded from the Quebec Class Members Settlement Class. suffer? BC Action British Autolights Camp Xxxxxx Xxxxx Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd., North American Lighting, Inc., Ichikoh Industries, Ltd., Xxxxxxx Electric Co., Ltd., Xxxxxxx Electric U.S. Co., Inc., and II Xxxxxxx Co., Inc. All Persons in British Did the Settling June 1,1997 to Columbia Xxxxxxxx Columbia who, during the Defendants, or any April 2, 2019. Supreme Xxxxxxxx Class Period, (a) purchased, of them, conspire to Court File Xxxxxxxx directly or indirectly, fix, raise, maintain, No. S- LLP Autolights; and/or (b) and/or stabilize the 135606 purchased or leased, directly prices of Autolights (Vancouver or indirectly, a new or used in Canada and/or Registry) Automotive Vehicle elsewhere during the containing Autolights; and/or Class Period? If so, Court and File No. Part Plaintiff(s)’ Counsel Plaintiff(s) Defendants Settlement Class Common Issues Class Period (c) purchased for import into what damages, if Canada, a new or used any, did Settlement Automotive Vehicle Class Members containing Autolights. suffer? Excluded Persons are excluded from the BC Settlement Class. SCHEDULE “B” ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No. • THE HONOURABLE ) , THE DAY JUSTICE BELOBABA ) OF , 2021 BETWEEN: SHERIDAN CHEVROLET CADILLAC LTD., THE XXXXXXXXX AUTO MALL LTD., and XXXX XXXXXX - and - [INSERT NAMED DEFENDANTS] Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 ORDER - [INSERT NAME OF RELEVANT PART] - - Xxxxxxx Electric Notice Approval and Consent Certification - Plaintiffs Defendants THIS MOTION made by...
Sample 1

Related to Quebec Action

  • COURT ACTION If a judgment of dissolution of marriage is obtained by either Xxxxxx, the original of this Agreement shall be attached to the judgment. The court shall be requested to do the following:

  • Action Action" means any demand, action, suit, countersuit, arbitration, inquiry, proceeding or investigation by or before any federal, state, local, foreign or international governmental authority or any arbitration or mediation tribunal.

  • Civil Action except where a joint Union-Employer Committee considers that there has been flagrant or wilful negligence on the part of an employee, the Employer agrees not to seek indemnity against an employee whose actions result in a judgement against the Employer. The Employer agrees to pay any judgement against an employee arising out of the performance of his/her duties. The Employer also agrees to pay any legal costs incurred in the proceedings including those of the employee.

  • Legal Action If you are dissatisfied with the determination of your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law. Under state law, you may not begin court proceedings prior to the expiration of sixty (60) days after the date you filed your claim. In no event may legal action be taken against us later than three (3) years from the date you were required to file the claim. For members covered by a group (employer sponsored) health plan, your plan may be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended. Under federal law, if your plan is subject to ERISA you may have the right to bring legal action under section 502(a) of ERISA after you have exhausted all appeals available under the plan. That means, for both medical and administrative appeals, federal law requires that you pursue a final decision from the plan, prior to filing suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. For a medical appeal, that final decision is the determination of the appeal. You are not required to submit your claim to external review prior to filing a suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. Consult your employer to determine whether this applies to you and what your rights and obligations may be. If you are dissatisfied with the decision on your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law.

  • PREVIOUS COURT ACTIONS The Couple has: (check one) ☐ - ALREADY had custody and visitation rights administered by a court in the County of , State of . Case Number . ☐ - NOT had custody and visitation rights administered by a court.

  • Certain Actions Without limiting the foregoing and except as disclosed on Schedule 4.10, (i) all necessary material notices have been properly filed, and no further action is required under current applicable Environmental Law as to each Response or other restoration or remedial project undertaken by the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or any of the Borrower’s or such Subsidiary’s former Subsidiaries on any of their presently or formerly owned or operated Property and (ii) the present and, to the Credit Parties’ knowledge, future liability, if any, of the Borrower or of any Subsidiary which could reasonably be expected to arise in connection with requirements under Environmental Laws will not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change.

  • Civil Actions Except when the Joint Committee established under Article 28 considers that there has been flagrant or wilful negligence on the part of an employee, the Employer agrees not to seek indemnity against an employee whose actions result in a judgement against the Employer. The Employer agrees to pay any judgement against an employee arising out of the performance of their duties. The Employer also agrees to pay any legal costs incurred in the proceedings including those of the employee.

  • APPEAL ACTIONS Appeal of TMA actions under this agreement, to the extent they are allowable, will be pursuant to 32 CFR 199.10.

  • Board Action The Parent’s Board of Directors (a) has unanimously determined that the Merger is advisable and in the best interests of the Parent’s stockholders and is on terms that are fair to such Parent stockholders and (b) has caused the Parent, in its capacity as the sole stockholder of the Acquisition Subsidiary, and the Board of Directors of the Acquisition Subsidiary, to approve the Merger and this Agreement by unanimous written consent.

  • Dismissal of the Proceedings (1) Upon the Effective Date, the Ontario Action shall be dismissed with prejudice and without costs as against the Settling Defendants.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.