Quality Criteria. In carrying out the license granted herein, Instructor agrees to follow the guidelines and quality standards set forth in Item 4 of this Agreement.
Quality Criteria. The line speed available at provisioning time shall be compliant to that shown in the WBS tool or communicated by TELE-POST wholesale department until the WBS services are available. Should the actual line speed of the Service be less than the speed predicted then the Service Taker will be offered the BSA Service at a lower speed and the corresponding lower price. If the actual speed falls by greater than 20% of the predicted speed then the Service Taker can register a fault with TELE-POST. The fault reporting process can be found at Annex E1 of this Agreement.
Quality Criteria. In carrying out the sublicense granted herein, Sublicensee agrees to follow the guidelines and quality standards set forth in Item 4 of this Agreement.
Quality Criteria. It will be assumed that the single tools will have been evaluated with respect to their quality in the component tests of the development cycles (WP 7). Therefore the tool evaluation focuses on „strategic‟ output objects in the work flows, which integrate the results of several PANACEA tools. Such objects will be: • aligned and tokenised sentences (level 1) • annotated bilingual dictionaries (level 2) The sentence level evaluation will answer the question if there are sufficiently many data, if they are normalised, sentence-segmentised and tokenised properly, and if the alignment produces meaningful results. Evaluation will use human inspection of some parts of the aligned corpora, and counting errors of the tools which contributed to the output: Errors in normalisation, segmentation, tokenisation, and alignment (on sentence level) will be counted21. Details will be coordinated with the WP 7 component evaluation task. The dictionary level evaluation will comprise four main tools: monolingual and bilingual term extraction, and monolingual and bilingual entry annotation. These tools create an annotated bilingual dictionary, to be used by MT systems in the task-based evaluation. The dictionary will be evaluated according to the following sets of criteria: • Formal criteria / Validation: Wellformedness of the produced entries, presence of obligatory annotations, size • Quality criteria: Correctness of proposed translations, using a test sample • Annotation criteria: Proper annotation of the entries, also using a test sample Errors will be collected, and traced to one of the four components which have built the dictionary.
Quality Criteria. 6.1 Seller must maintain a quality standard at least comparable to those furnished by Seller to Seller's preferred customers and at least equivalent to those offered to Seller's preferred customers as of Effective Date. During the Term, Buyer may, upon no less than 48 hours prior notice and during normal business hours, make reasonable inspections no more often than once per calendar month of the facilities where Seller prepares and prints the Products.
Quality Criteria. (A) The Service Provider shall ensure that all plans listed in paragraphs 3.1to 3.3 comprising the Implementation Plan are, without limiting the Service Provider‟s other obligations under this Schedule and the Agreement, subject to the following quality criteria:
Quality Criteria. This document has the objective to establish the quality requirements that Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx requires its raw material suppliers to meet when commercializing products with the Company. In accordance with Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx quality requirements, each supplier is evaluated according to the following criteria:
Quality Criteria a. Full Faith is defined as the Full Faith and Credit of the United States Government
Quality Criteria. The services to be provided by NSI pursuant to 3.1 (a) must meet the quality criteria set forth in ATTACHMENT 1.
Quality Criteria. The quality criteria for production release will be as follows: · All individual part numbers on the BOM have been fully qualified · All sub-assemblies produced by suppliers have been qualified · The packaging has been defined and qualified, including labels · All production tools have been qualified and properly identified · The Seller’s production SOPs have been released and verified · The production test matrix has been verified to meet the Buyer’s PRD · The product cosmetic and final inspection criteria has been defined and agreed to by the Buyer’s Quality representative · A copy of the up-to-date indented BOM with manufacturer part numbers and descriptions has been provided to the Buyer All product regulatory requirements have been satisfied · All Severity 1 issues on the Quality Action Register have been closed · All Severity 2 issues on the Quality Action Register have a plan for closure within 30 days from release to production · The Seller has produced a pilot build of >[Confidential Treatment has been requested] with a FPY [Confidential Treatment has been requested] · A copy of all deviations or waivers for the engineering qualification build has been provided to and approved by the Buyer
