Quality Assurance Reviews. State reserves the right to conduct Quality Assurance Reviews at appropriate checkpoints throughout the project. Contractor will facilitate the review process by making staff and information available as requested by the reviewers at no additional cost to the State.
Quality Assurance Reviews. College reserves the right to conduct Quality Assurance Reviews at appropriate checkpoints throughout the project. Contractor will facilitate the review process by making staff and information available as requested by the reviewers at no additional cost to the College.
Quality Assurance Reviews. All deliverables received will be subjected to a thorough quality assurance review. Deliverables will not be considered completed until accepted by the designated Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). When the COR reviews a deliverable and raises quality or content issues, the BPA Holder / Contractor must fully address all those comments before resubmitting to USAID. Quality and presentation are of significant essence. (END OF SECTION E)
Quality Assurance Reviews. Senior FNI staff will meet with project staff and verify that FNI quality control guidelines and the project-specific quality control plans are being implemented. We anticipate two Quality assurance reviews:
Quality Assurance Reviews. Detail the methods used to monitor and achieve organization compliance with Agreement requirements for services and products.
Quality Assurance Reviews. Conduct semi-annual Quality Assurance Reviews to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Agreement. Quality Assurance Reviews shall be conducted to evaluate the adequacy of materials, processes, documentation, procedures, training, guidance, and staffing included in the execution of this Agreement. Quality Assurance Reviews shall also be developed and performed to achieve compliance with specific QA provisions contained in this Agreement. The semi-annual reviews shall be submitted to the Construction Project Manager in written form no later than one (1) month after the review. On short duration CCEI projects (nine (9) months or less), the CCEI shall perform an initial QA review within the first two (2) months of the start of construction. On asphalt projects, the CCEI shall perform an initial QA review on its asphalt inspection staff after the Contractor has completed ten (10) full work days of mainline asphalt paving operations, or 25% of the asphalt pay item amount (whichever is less) to validate that all sampling, testing, inspection, and documentation are occurring as required of the CCEI staff. Financial Project ID (s): 258422-2-62-03
Quality Assurance Reviews. (QARs) – These reviews are compliance oriented reviews and examine how quality control procedures are being used per control and guidance documents such as: 1) environmental preparation manuals, 2) INDOT design manual, 3) bid/contract documents such as specifications and drawings, and 4) General Instructions to Field Employees (GIFE) for construction. INDOT and FHWA will work to establish a QAR Program of reviews on a regular cycle for the following program areas: Consultant Selection, Planning, Environment, Design, Right-of-Way and Construction. A minimum of five (5) QARs will be identified each year and the focus of reviews will be based on an assessment of risk and where improvements may be needed.
Quality Assurance Reviews. 1. The Cabinet, or its agent, may conduct periodic quality assurance review for out-of-home placements. Periodically, the Cabinet or its agent shall monitor the Agency for quality assurance and performance. The periodic review shall assess the substantive clinical aspects of care to assure that services are being provided which meet the resident’s needs and correspond to the child’s assigned level of care. The private child-caring and/or private child-placing Agency shall provide full cooperation with the Cabinet and/or its agent as follows:
Quality Assurance Reviews. Regular QA Reviews are conducted on completed PCE/CE and supporting documents by EHES NEPA Program staff, in coordination with Region and FHWA staff as available. Standard questions developed by EHES NEPA Program and FHWA staff are used to assess the accuracy and consistency of PCE/CE documents and processes using the CE/PCE Procedures (Section 420 of this Manual). Written summaries are produced by EHES NEPA Program staff using a standard format agreed to by the EHES NEPA Program and FHWA that provide QA Review Findings and Recommendations. The QA Review Summaries (Findings and Recommendations) are then shared with RECs and their managers via email, and discussed at REC and environmental managers meetings.
Quality Assurance Reviews. Frequency Review Each teaching period Moderation of grading/marking against a sample UNE cohort, by UNE staff, and tabled to the relevant Board of Examiners. Annually Student Satisfaction benchmarked against a sample UNE cohort, which is of the same AQF Level and in a similar discipline. If a similar discipline is not available, it is benchmarked against the school cohort. Annually Review of staffing qualifications and/or scholarship including ensuring that all staff resources are available to fulfill their role, or are appropriately replaced, throughout the agreement period. Annually The functioning of the contract, through performance against the deliverables of the agreement throughout the period of the agreement. Annually The outcomes of moderations of assessment.
