QUALITATIVE PROCESS DOCUMENTATION Sample Clauses

QUALITATIVE PROCESS DOCUMENTATION. Methodology We will carry out a series of focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) to explore the community opinions about the TBA-CHW teaming, their acceptability and the characteristics of a good or not so good a team. Sampling FGDs will be carried out with mothers of children (0 -23 months); and TBA and CHW teams. The IDIs will be performed with traditional/community leaders, local NHC members, and health managers at the district. Two FGDs will be conducted with mothers from NHC areas with TBA-CHW teams adjudged as “above average teams” and two from NHC areas with TBA-CHW teams adjudged as “below average teams.” In addition, two FGDs will be conducted with TBAs and CHWs belonging to “above average teams” and two with TBAs and CHWs belonging to “below average teams”. A total of eight FGDs will be performed. For the IDIs, two NHC areas with “above average TBA-CHW teams” and two with “below average teams” will be selected. For each NHC area, two community leaders (of which one will be a female) and four local heath committee members will be interviewed. In addition, four rural health center staff involved in supervision of TBAs and CHWs and two members of the DHMT will also be interviewed. A total of 30 IDIs will be conducted. Units of Analysis Focus Group Discussion In-Depth Interview NHCs with “above average” TBA-CHW team ▪ Two with mothers of children <24 months ▪ Two with TBA-CHW teams In each of two NHCs (n=12 total): ▪ 1 male community leader ▪ 1 female community leader ▪ 4 NHC members NHCs with “below average” TBA-CHW team ▪ Two with mothers of children <24 months ▪ Two with TBA-CHW teams In each of two NHCs (n=12 total): ▪ 1 male community leader ▪ 1 female community leader ▪ 4 NHC members RHC ▪ 4 supervisors DHMT ▪ 2 members Total 8 group discussions 30 interviews Analysis plan All transcripts will be entered into NVivo software (QSR International, Cambridge, MA). We will code the themes that emerge and analyze the data using grounded theory approach and domain analysis. For analysis of IDI data, we will focus on individual views and will, where relevant, look at the proportion of total respondents who report particular views. For the FGD data, we will focus on whether most or many participants felt the same way about specific issues. Special note will be taken if one person (or a minority of respondents) in the focus groups expresses views or describes behaviors very differently than the majority of the group (an “outlier”).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to QUALITATIVE PROCESS DOCUMENTATION

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Implementation Report Within 150 days after the Effective Date, Extendicare shall submit a written report to OIG summarizing the status of its implementation of the requirements of this CIA (Implementation Report). The Implementation Report shall, at a minimum, include:

  • Project Implementation 2. The Borrower shall:

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

  • CERTIFICATION OF NO ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS OR WORK 8.1 The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that no asbestos containing materials or work is included within the scope of the Work. The Contractor shall take whatever measures it deems necessary to insure that all employees, suppliers, fabricators, material men, subcontractors, or their assigns, comply with this requirement.

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

  • Licensed Documentation If commercially available, Licensee shall have the option to require the Contractor to deliver, at Contractor’s expense: (i) one (1) hard copy and one (1) master electronic copy of the Documentation in a mutually agreeable format; (ii) based on hard copy instructions for access by downloading from the Internet

  • Project Documentation All documentation provided to the City other than Project drawings shall be furnished on a Microsoft compatible compact disc.

  • Construction materials (1) The restrictions of section 1605 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5) (Recovery Act) do not apply to Recovery Act designated country manufactured construction material. The restrictions of the Buy American statute do not apply to designated country unmanufactured construction material. Consistent with U.S. obligations under international agreements, this clause implements--

  • Product Documentation You should review the policy documents carefully to ensure they accurately reflect the cover, conditions, limits, and other terms that you require. Particular attention should be paid to policy conditions and warranties as failure to comply with these could invalidate your policy. It is important that you retain and keep safely all documents associated with your policy so that you can refer to them in the event of a claim.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.