Protocol Overview Sample Clauses

Protocol Overview. The basic protocol operates in two phases, after which a possible decision is taken. Each pro- cess maintains an estimate. In the first phase, each process broadcasts its estimate using a reliable broadcast service, bv-broadcast (discussed below), as introduced previously [1]. The protocol uses a rotating coordinator; whoever is the as- signed coordinator for a round broadcasts its estimate with a special designation. All processes then wait until they receive at least one mes- sage, and until a timer expires. (The timeout is increased with each iteration, so that eventually once the network stabilizes it is long enough.) If a process receives a message from the coordinator, then it chooses the coordinator’s value to “echo”, i.e., to rebroadcast to everyone in the second phase. Other- wise, it simply echoes all the messages received in the first phase. − − At this point, each process pi waits until it receives enough compatible ECHO messages. Specifically, it waits to receive at least (n t0) messages sent by distinct processes where every value in those messages was also received by pi in the first phase. In this case, it adopts the collection of values in those (n t0) messages as its candidate set. In fact, if a − process pi receives a set of (n t0) messages that all contain exactly the coordinator’s value, then it chooses only that value as the candidate value. Finally, the processes try to come to a decision. If process pi has only one candidate value v, then pi adopts that value v as its estimate. In that case, it can decide v if it matches the parity of the round, i.e., if v = ri mod 2. Otherwise, if pi has more than one candidate value, then it adopts as its estimate ri mod 2, the parity of the round. − − To see that this ensures agreement (when t < n/3), consider a round in which some process pi decides value v = ri mod 2. Since pi receives (n t0) echo messages containing only the value v, we know that every honest process must have value v in every possible set of (n t0) echo messages, and hence every honest process included v in its candidate set. Every honest process that only had v as a candidate also decided
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Protocol Overview b 3 l n 3 m + 1 runs as follows4: The rst run of the reduced protocol proceeds in The e cient protocol consists of executing the reduced protocol in sequence for the same way as the basic protocol (with the di erence that it only proceeds for b communication rounds). In every subsequent run (say the m-th run) of the reduced protocol the rst communication round of the protocol is omitted. Instead of receiving a value from the dealer, every player p assigns the resolved root value computed at the end of the previous run to the root node of his reduced IG-tree: tree(m)(d) := resolve(m 1)(d) :
Protocol Overview. The e cient protocol consists of executing the reduced protocol in sequence for n 3
Protocol Overview b 3 ln 3 m + 1 runs as follows4: The rst run of the reduced protocol proceeds in The e cient protocol consists of executing the reduced protocol in sequence for

Related to Protocol Overview

  • Program Overview A. Goals of the Choice Neighborhoods Program. The Choice Neighborhoods Program employs a comprehensive approach to neighborhood transformation. The program transforms neighborhoods of concentrated poverty into mixed-income neighborhoods of long-term viability by revitalizing severely distressed public and/or assisted housing; improving access to economic opportunities; and investing and leveraging investments in well-functioning services, effective schools and education programs, public assets, public transportation, and improved access to jobs. Choice Neighborhoods ensures that current residents benefit from this transformation by preserving affordable housing in the neighborhood or providing the choice to move to affordable housing in another neighborhood of opportunity. The purpose of this grant is to implement a Transformation Plan that has been developed through a local planning process and furthers the goals of the Choice Neighborhoods Program. The core goals of Choice Neighborhoods are:

  • Overview (a) The Employer is committed to maintaining a stable and skilled workforce, recognising its contribution to the operation of the Employer. As such, full time direct and ongoing employment is a guiding principle of this Agreement.

  • Project Overview The Statement of Work (SOW) documents the project scope, methodology, roles and responsibilities, implementation stages, and deliverables for the implementation of Tyler products. The project goals are to offer City of Xxxxxxxx Florida the opportunity to make the City of Xxxxxxxx more accessible and responsive to external and internal customer needs and more efficient in its operations through:  Streamlining, automating, and integrating business processes and practices  Providing tools to produce and access information in a real‐time environment  Enabling and empowering users to become more efficient, productive and responsive  Successfully overcoming current challenges and meeting future goals

  • Agreement Overview This SLA operates in conjunction with, and does not supersede or replace any part of, the Agreement. It outlines the information technology service levels that we will provide to you to ensure the availability of the application services that you have requested us to provide. All other support services are documented in the Support Call Process.

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.