Proposed clearing Sample Clauses

Proposed clearing. An aerial photograph and/or map with a north arrow must be attached, clearly marking the area proposed to be cleared or if you have the facilities, a digital map on a suitable portable digital storage device of the area to clear as an ESRI shapefile with the following properties: Geometry type: Polygon shape Coordinate system: GDA 1994 (Geographic latitude/longitude) Datum: GDA 1994 (Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994). An ESRI shapefile must be provided if the application requires an assessment under an EPBC Act accredited process. Total area of clearing proposed (hectares) Approx. 0.07 and/or number of individual trees to be removed 19 living trees between 3-8m in height, 2 dead trees 6-7m in height. Proposed method of clearing: Both mechanical and hand-held clearing and slashing for the compound and construction lay-down area and access track, and hand-held lopping of branches over- hanging the access route Purpose of clearing: To establish a compound for an nbn fixed-wireless facility, construction lay-down area and access track. Period within which clearing is proposed to be undertaken, e.g. May 2018 – June 2018 from January 2018 to January 2018 Final land use: Telecommunications infrastructure You must provide evidence that avoidance and mitigation options have been pursued to eliminate, reduce or otherwise mitigate the need for, and scale of, the proposed clearing of native vegetation. Have alternatives that would avoid or minimise the need for clearing been considered and applied? ☒ Yes ☐ No If yes, provide details: Compound location selected in a generally cleared area close to an existing access point and firebreak (to be utilised in part for vehicular access)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposed clearing. An aerial photograph and/or map with a north arrow must be attached, clearly marking the area proposed to be cleared or if you have the facilities, a digital map on a suitable portable digital storage device of the area to clear as an ESRI shapefile with the following properties: Geometry type: Polygon shape Coordinate system: GDA 1994 (Geographic latitude/longitude) Datum: GDA 1994 (Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994). An ESRI shapefile must be provided if the application requires an assessment under an EPBC Act accredited process. Total area of clearing proposed (hectares) 10.68ha and/or number of individual trees to be removed 0 Proposed method of clearing: Spraying with glyphosate bioactive/ cutting below water level and removing/ removing from rhyzomes with specialized vehicle (Truxor – Xxxx Cove Waterways) Purpose of clearing: To manage Typha orientalis to prevent it from becoming invasive and dominating sites and reducing biodiversity Period within which clearing is proposed to be undertaken, e.g. May 2018 – June 2018 from June 2019 to June 2024 Final land use: Conservation area You must provide evidence that avoidance and mitigation options have been pursued to eliminate, reduce or otherwise mitigate the need for, and scale of, the proposed clearing of native vegetation. Have alternatives that would avoid or minimise the need for clearing been considered and applied? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, provide details: Refer to DWER’s Clearing of native vegetation offsets procedure guideline available on the DWER website, and the Environmental Protection Authority’s (EPA) WA Environmental Offsets Policy and Guidelines on the EPA website for further information. Do you want to submit a clearing permit offset proposal with your application? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, provide details, and complete and attach Appendix A of the Clearing of native vegetation offsets procedure guideline.
Proposed clearing. An aerial photograph and/or map with a north arrow must be attached, clearly marking the area proposed to be cleared or if you have the facilities, a digital map on a suitable portable digital storage device of the area to clear as an ESRI shapefile with the following properties: Geometry type: Polygon shape Coordinate system: GDA 1994 (Geographic latitude/longitude) Datum: GDA 1994 (Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994). An ESRI shapefile must be provided if the application requires an assessment under an EPBC Act accredited process. Total area of clearing proposed (hectares) TREATMENT 2320 - this break is required to manage the planned prescribed burn. 0.475 ha. This firebreak will be plotted to minimise removal of any significant vegetation reflective of the Eucalypt Woodland TEC. Width of the firebreak will be in accordance with the Shire of Wagin firebreak notice – no more than 3metres. TREATMENT 2326 – Prescribed Burn to reduce fuel age and fuel loading. 26 Hectares. Cool slow burn. TREATMENT 2325 – this break is required to contain the planned prescribed burn. 0.786 ha. This firebreak will be plotted to minimise removal of any significant vegetation reflective of the Eucalypt Woodland TEC. Width of the firebreak will be in accordance with the Shire of Wagin firebreak notice – no more than 3metres. and/or number of individual trees to be removed Unknown – however significant vegetation will be retained The prescribed burn will be undertaken in Autumn or Spring and will be conducted as a cool, slow burn with minimal scorch height. Proposed method of clearing: Fuel reduction burn and mechanical works.(mulching) Mulch dead branches on ground. Note: Total clearing of the land will not be undertaken. Purpose of clearing: The reserves create a fire risk to town site. Clean up areas to create fire break. The prescribed burn is also advantageous to regenerate the native vegetation which is in a significantly degraded condition with a prevalence of sheoaks taking over the land tenure. Period within which clearing is proposed to be undertaken, e.g. May 2018 – June 2018 from September 2019 to September 2024 Final land use: Recreation No change to land use You must provide evidence that avoidance and mitigation options have been pursued to eliminate, reduce or otherwise mitigate the need for, and scale of, the proposed clearing of native vegetation. Have alternatives that would avoid or minimise the need for clearing been considered and applied? ☒ Yes ☐ No If yes,...
Proposed clearing. An aerial photograph and/or map with a north arrow must be attached, clearly marking the area proposed to be cleared or if you have the facilities, a digital map on a suitable portable digital storage device of the area to clear as an ESRI shapefile with the following properties: Geometry type: Polygon shape Coordinate system: GDA 1994 (Geographic latitude/longitude) Datum: GDA 1994 (Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994). An ESRI shapefile must be provided if the application requires an assessment under an EPBC Act accredited process. Total area of clearing proposed (hectares) 22.4 Ha within the four purpose boundaries. and/or number of individual trees to be removed Proposed method of clearing: Mechanical means. Purpose of clearing: Extension of existing gravel pits for road upgrades and maintenance works. Period within which clearing is proposed to be undertaken, e.g. May 2018 – June 2018 from June 2020 to December 2023 Final land use: Pastoral/grazing. You must provide evidence that avoidance and mitigation options have been pursued to eliminate, reduce or otherwise mitigate the need for, and scale of, the proposed clearing of native vegetation. Have alternatives that would avoid or minimise the need for clearing been considered and applied? ☒ Yes ☐ No If yes, provide details: Minimise clearing wherever possible.
Proposed clearing. An aerial photograph and/or map with a north arrow must be attached, clearly marking the area proposed to be cleared or if you have the facilities, a digital map on a suitable portable digital storage device of the area to clear as an ESRI shapefile with the following properties: Geometry type: Polygon shape Coordinate system: GDA 1994 (Geographic latitude/longitude) Datum: GDA 1994 (Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994). An ESRI shapefile must be provided if the application requires an assessment under an EPBC Act accredited process. Total area of clearing proposed (hectares) 142 ha and/or number of individual trees to be removed NA Proposed method of clearing: Clearing will be by earth moving equipment. Purpose of clearing: The purpose of the clearing is to upgrade the Hillside Marble-Bar Road to a sealed road to allow for the haulage of iron ore from Atlas' Corunna Downs Project to Port Hedland and for use by the general public. The proposed upgrade will include geotechnical and water investigations, water infrastructure, vertical and horizontal realignment and widening of the existing road. The proposed works is over a 33km length of road. Period within which clearing is proposed to be undertaken, e.g. May 2018 – June 2018 from April 2019 to April 2026 Final land use: Public road You must provide evidence that avoidance and mitigation options have been pursued to eliminate, reduce or otherwise mitigate the need for, and scale of, the proposed clearing of native vegetation. Have alternatives that would avoid or minimise the need for clearing been considered and applied? Yes No If yes, provide details: Upgrade of the existing public road is the option with least impact- the alternate being a new road. Refer to DWER’s Clearing of native vegetation offsets procedure guideline available on the DWER website, and the Environmental Protection Authority’s (EPA) WA Environmental Offsets Policy and Guidelines on the EPA website for further information. Do you want to submit a clearing permit offset proposal with your application? Yes No If yes, provide details, and complete and attach Appendix A of the Clearing of native vegetation offsets procedure guideline.
Proposed clearing. An aerial photograph or map with a north arrow must be attached, clearly marking the area proposed to be cleared or if you have the facilities, a digital map on a suitable portable digital storage device of the area to clear as an ESRI shapefile with the following properties: Geometry type: Polygon shape Coordinate system: GDA 1994 (Geographic latitude/longitude) Datum: GDA 1994 (Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994). An ESRI shapefile must be provided if the application requires an assessment under an EPBC Act accredited process. Total area of clearing proposed (hectares) 10 and/or number of individual trees to be removed Proposed method of clearing Selected individual dead and fallen trees Period within which clearing is proposed to be undertaken, e.g. May 2018 – June 2018 From 2018 to 2020 Purpose of clearing Fire mitigation and more pasture growth for cattle Final land use: Cattle grazing but maintain xxxx
Proposed clearing. An aerial photograph and/or map with a north arrow must be attached, clearly marking the area proposed to be cleared or if you have the facilities, a digital map on a suitable portable digital storage device of the area to clear as an ESRI shapefile with the following properties: Geometry type: Polygon shape Coordinate system: GDA 1994 (Geographic latitude/longitude) Datum: GDA 1994 (Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994). An ESRI shapefile must be provided if the application requires an assessment under an EPBC Act accredited process. Total area of clearing proposed (hectares) 4 and/or number of individual trees to be removed Proposed method of clearing: Knock over vegetation with blade up and stockpile for use in rehabilitation. Blade down clearing with loader to remove topsoil to store for use in rehabilitation. Purpose of clearing: Mineral processing plant and associated infrastructure. Period within which clearing is proposed to be undertaken, e.g. May 2018 – June 2018 from February 2019 to August 2019 Final land use: Rural/industrial You must provide evidence that avoidance and mitigation options have been pursued to eliminate, reduce or otherwise mitigate the need for, and scale of, the proposed clearing of native vegetation. Have alternatives that would avoid or minimise the need for clearing been considered and applied? ☒ Yes ☐ No If yes, provide details: The processing plant is to be located on previously disturbed ground as far as possible, with only minor clearing of isolated patches of highly disturbed vegetation required. The process plant has been designed to have a minimal footprint as possible and is located as close to the bitterns intake and outlet as possible to minimise pipeline distances. Ponds are located on bare tidal flats.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposed clearing. You must provide evidence that avoidance and mitigation options have been pursued to eliminate, reduce, or otherwise mitigate the need for, and scale of, the proposed clearing of native vegetation. Have alternatives that would avoid or minimise the need for clearing been considered and applied? Yes No If yes, provide details: Numerous arrangements of the car park with its existing footprint were considered however, there was no configuration capable of accommodating the increase in additional car bays as required by AS3962-2001 which states; urban boat ramps require 40-50 boat trailer bays for each ramp/lane. Clearing of native vegetation offsets procedure guideline available on the DWER website, and the Environmental Protection WA Environmental Offsets Policy and Guidelines on the EPA website for further information. Do you want to submit a clearing permit offset proposal with your application? Yes No If yes, provide details, and complete and attach Appendix A of the Clearing of native vegetation offsets procedure guideline.
Proposed clearing. An aerial photograph and/or map with a north arrow must be attached, clearly marking the area proposed to be cleared or if you have the facilities, a digital map on a suitable portable digital storage device of the area to clear as an ESRI shapefile with the following properties: Geometry type: Polygon shape Coordinate system: GDA 1994 (Geographic latitude/longitude) Datum: GDA 1994 (Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994). An ESRI shapefile must be provided if the application requires an assessment under an EPBC Act accredited process. Total area of clearing proposed (hectares) 4570m2 (see map provided) and/or number of individual trees to be removed Proposed method of clearing: Mechanical, removal and mulching. Diseased tree mulch will not be used in other areas. Purpose of clearing: Road widening to improve road safety and service, installation of new bridge 3694 replaced with culvert. Period within which clearing is proposed to be undertaken, e.g. May 2018 – June 2018 from December 2018 to December 2020 Final land use: Access road You must provide evidence that avoidance and mitigation options have been pursued to eliminate, reduce or otherwise mitigate the need for, and scale of, the proposed clearing of native vegetation. Have alternatives that would avoid or minimise the need for clearing been considered and applied? ☒ Yes ☐ No If yes, provide details: Have surveyed trees and most are diseased and close to the road verge, none can be realistically protected during road works activity.

Related to Proposed clearing

  • Alternative Clearing System References in this Agreement to Euroclear and/or Clearstream, Luxembourg shall, wherever the context so permits, be deemed to include reference to any additional or alternative clearing system approved by the Issuer, the Guarantor, the Registrar and the Issuing and Principal Paying Agent.

  • Construction Clearing All timber is designated for cutting that is within the clearing limits of roads constructed hereunder or is in other authorized clearings. All dead or unstable live trees are designated for cutting that are sufficiently tall to reach Purchaser’s landings or the roadbed of Specified and Temporary Roads when Marked in advance of felling of timber in the immediate vicinity. Pieces meeting Utilization Standards from such dead or unstable live trees shall be removed, unless there is agreement that to do so could damage the road. Such designation may be revised as part of agreed changes in road location under B5.2.

  • Verification of the Registration of E - Bidders 6.1. Registration shall subject to verification and approval of the Auctioneer’s website and subject further to bank’s clearance of deposit payment. Please take note that approval from the Auctioneer’s administrator may take at least 1 working day and any improper, incomplete registration or late registration may be rejected at the sole discretion of the Auctioneer. Neither the Auctioneer nor its website nor its agents and/or representative bears any responsibility or assumes any liability in the event that the registration of a prospective E-Bidders is rejected and/or delayed for any reason whatsoever. In the event of the registration is rejected, the deposit paid (if cleared by the bank) shall be refunded to the same bank account from which the deposit transfer was made within three (3) working days.

  • Notice to Settlement Class Members 5.1 The Parties agree that the following Notice Program provides reasonable notice to the Settlement Class.

  • Settlement Class Certification The Settling Parties agree, for purposes of this settlement only, to the certification of the Settlement Class. If the settlement set forth in this Settlement Agreement is not approved by the Court, or if the Settlement Agreement is terminated or cancelled pursuant to the terms of this Settlement Agreement, this Settlement Agreement, and the certification of the Settlement Class provided for herein, will be vacated and the Litigation shall proceed as though the Settlement Class had never been certified, without prejudice to any Person’s or Settling Party’s position on the issue of class certification or any other issue. The Settling Parties’ agreement to the certification of the Settlement Class is also without prejudice to any position asserted by the Settling Parties in any other proceeding, case or action, as to which all of their rights are specifically preserved.

  • Class Notice The Settling Parties have presented to the Court proposed forms of Settlement Notice, which are appended hereto as Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4, respectively.

  • Settlement Class 2. Pursuant to Rule 23(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court preliminarily finds that the Court will likely find that the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3) have been satisfied for settlement and judgment purposes only. As to the requirements of Rule 23(a) for settlement purposes only, (i) the Settlement Class provisionally certified herein likely exceeds 100,000 individuals, and joinder of all would be impracticable; (ii) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class; (iii) Class Representatives’ claims are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class they seek to represent for purposes of settlement; and (iv) Class Representatives are adequate representatives of the Settlement Class. As to the requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) for settlement purposes only, questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class predominate over any questions affecting any individual Settlement Class Member, and a class action on behalf of the Settlement Class is superior to other available means of settling and disposing of this dispute.

  • Eligibility of Registered E- Bidders 2.1. E-Bidders who register as a user to participate in every public auction on Rajan Auctioneers website shall:

  • Settlement Class Members “Settlement Class Members” shall mean all persons in the Class who do not exclude themselves pursuant to Section F, herein, and those who submit a Valid Claim.

  • Determination of Clearing Price The Selling Shareholder and the Placement Agents shall have determined, in writing, the clearing price for the Securities in the Auction.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.