Proposal Content. Proposal shall demonstrate an understanding of the requirements and the proposed method of completing the SOW. To facilitate the evaluation, the proposal should be sufficiently detailed and complete to clearly demonstrate that the prospective Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements and the technical and management problems inherent therein. It should also contain sufficient detail to indicate the proposed means for complying with all applicable specifications. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands and can or will comply with all specifications, statements paraphrasing the specifications or parts thereof, and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used”, etc., will be considered insufficient and potentially “Unacceptable.” Offerors shall comply with all solicitation requirements, terms, and conditions. Any exceptions shall be identified to the Government prior to receipt of the Offeror’s proposal. Failure to comply with all solicitation requirements may result in the Offeror being considered ineligible for award.
Proposal Content. The Offeror shall make a firm commitment to provide services as required and proposed. The material contained in the Offer shall be relevant to the service requirements stated in the solicitation. It is to be submitted in a sequence that reflects the scope of work section of this document. It is to include information relevant to the designated evaluation criteria. Failure to include the requested information may have a negative impact on the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal.
Proposal Content. The Proposal shall submit the following components and shall be laid out in the format exactly as shown here. The information provided in these sections will be used as the basis to score the overall proposal. The submittal shall be signed by an authorized representative of the proposing firm.
Proposal Content. H.10.3 Government Evaluation of Order Proposals DEVIATION of H.10.3 Initial 4 Delivery Orders H.10.4 Authorization to Proceed on Orders H.10.5 Option Exercises at Order Level H.10.6 Order Completion H.10.7 Fair Opportunity Exception
Proposal Content. Unless the ITO indicates otherwise, proposals will consist of a technical volume and a cost/price volume. Alternate DO/TO proposals are only allowed if stated in the ITO. All proposals shall have a validity period stated on the proposal. A minimum of 30 days after proposal submission is required, unless otherwise stated on the ITO.
Proposal Content. A. One completed and signed Rhode Island W-9 (included in the original copy only) downloaded from the Division of Purchases website at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx/rivip/publicdocuments/fw9.pdf. Do not include any copies in the Technical or Cost proposals.
Proposal Content. L.2.1.1 All proposals shall be in English (American Standard) and shall be in US dollars. Proposals not in English or in US Dollars may be rejected. The proposal shall include all information specified and shall address all requirements outlined in Section L. The offeror's proposal shall be submitted organized in separate volumes and within the page limits as set forth below. The offerors proposal shall consist of the following volumes: Volume Number Title Quantity Page Limit Volume I Technical 2 Unlimited Volume II Price 2 Unlimited Volume III Small Business Participation 2 10 pages Volume IV Administrative 2 Unlimited
Proposal Content. 8.1.1 Description of methodology used in fulfilling the requirements of the search process.
Proposal Content. 10. Proposals must be submitted in writing and should include, at a minimum:
Proposal Content. The City requires each Consultant to submit a proposal clearly addressing all of the requirements outlined in the RFQ. The proposal shall be limited to 30 pages (not including a cover page and staff resume) and must include a minimum of three recent or current client references, which include the address and telephone number of each reference. Resumes and a company qualification brochure may be added to the 30- page proposal, provided they are located in an Appendix at the back of the proposal. Material contained in appendices will not be used for evaluation purposes in the scoring of proposals. Though the Consultant may submit a proposal organized according to his preference, it must be clear and concise. Should a consultant have concerns about meeting any requirements of this RFQ they may include a clearly labeled subsection within an appendix with individual statements specifically identifying their concerns and exceptions. If no exceptions are stated the City shall assume the consultant understands all of the requirements of the RFQ, including the professional services agreement, and takes no exceptions to them. The requirements and expectations stated within this RFQ shall be included in the Agreement as an exhibit. Contractual Requirements / Retainer Agreement A Retainer Agreement for Building plan check services between the City of Turlock and Respondent will serve as basic document. The City may elect to extend this Agreement for three (3) additional one-year terms, on the same terms and conditions, upon providing written notice to the consultation thirty days prior to the expiration of this Agreement. On each anniversary date, the consultant will be allowed to increase hourly rates. Increases may not exceed increases in the San Francisco-Oakland Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers or percentage increases in Consultant’s published prices, whichever is lower. In all cases, the City of Turlock may cancel the contract if a requested price increase is not acceptable. For your use in assessing your proposal, please review the attached agreement paying special attention to the City’s insurance requirements delineated in Section 7, “Insurance.” Please have your legal counsel review the proposal. Along with your proposal for services, please supply an edited copy of the sample retainer agreement. The edited sample will be a starting point for the City’s review of your specific contract requests, and will not influence the consultant selection crit...
