Project XLC Acceptance Criteria Sample Clauses

Project XLC Acceptance Criteria. A. Superior Environmental Performance (SEP) There are two parts to demonstrating whether a project provides SEP. The first part (Tier 1) of the analysis must show that this XLC project will provide equivalent public health protection as compliance with the LCR. The second part (Tier 2) of the analysis must show that this project goes beyond providing equivalent public health protection, and in fact will provide superior environmental performance. Based on a qualitative analysis, US EPA believes this project meets the Tier 1 and Tier 2 criteria of public health protection for the reasons outlined below. Like most metropolitan areas in the United States, some children are exposed to lead from lead service lines connecting the drinking water distribution system to the individual home, and some children are exposed to lead-based paint in their homes. Moreover, some children may be exposed to lead from both sources. By today’s standards, children are considered to be at risk if their blood lead concentration exceeds 10 micrograms per deciliter of blood (Fg/dL). US EPA performed a comparative benefit analysis to evaluate the public health impacts of this XLC project.2 The analysis in the City of Columbus consisted of 20 areas defined by zip codes. The total number of children in the 20 areas is not known, but for the purposes of this analysis US EPA assumed 40,000 children live in the 20 zip code area. The LSCP will focus its efforts on a 10-zip code area within this 20 zip code area, in the center of the City. Old homes containing lead-based paint are concentrated in this 10-zip code focus area. The two categories evaluated in the comparative benefit analysis were (1) children (ages 0 to 6) living outside the 10-zip code focus area, but still within the 20 zip code area, in homes that were served by lead service lines and that contained no lead-based paint and (2) children living inside the 10- zip code focus area in homes that contain lead-based paint, some of which may also be served by lead service lines. The analysis indicated that the benefits from addressing exposure from the lead-based paint substantially exceeded the benefits from addressing the lead service lines. According to the City of Columbus, there are 28,802 lead service lines in the City’s water system and most of the lead service lines serve the 10-zip code focus area near the center of the City. US EPA assumes that an unknown number of lead service lines serve non-residential facilities. The ...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Project XLC Acceptance Criteria. The Clermont Project, as described in this Agreement, meets EPA's Project XLC criteria as indicated in 60 FR. 55569, November 1, 1995. The criteria and the basis for stating that they are met are summarized below.
Sample 1

Related to Project XLC Acceptance Criteria

  • Acceptance Criteria 6.7.2.1. During the test there shall be no evidence of:

  • Contract Goals A. For purposes of this procurement, OGS conducted a comprehensive search and determined that the Contract does not offer sufficient opportunities to set goals for participation by MWBEs as subcontractors, service providers, or suppliers to Contractor. Contractor is, however, encouraged to make every good faith effort to promote and assist the participation of MWBEs on this Contract for the provision of services and materials. The directory of New York State Certified MWBEs can be viewed at: xxxxx://xx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/FrontEnd/VendorSearchPublic.asp?TN=ny&XID=2528. Additionally, following Contract execution, Contractor is encouraged to contact the Division of Minority and Women’s Business Development ((000) 000-0000; (000) 000-0000; or (000) 000-0000) to discuss additional methods of maximizing participation by MWBEs on the Contract.

  • Project Goals The schedule, budget, physical, technical and other objectives for the Project shall be defined.

  • Specific Objectives In accordance with Articles 34 and 35 of the Cotonou Agreement, the specific objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones:

  • Design Criteria The Engineer shall develop the roadway design criteria based on the controlling factors specified by the State (i.e. 4R, 3R, 2R, or special facilities), by use of the funding categories, design speed, functional classification, roadway class and any other set criteria as set forth in PS&E Preparation Manual, Roadway Design Manual, Bridge Design Manual, Hydraulic Design Manual, and other deemed necessary State approved manuals. In addition, the Engineer shall prepare the Design Summary Report (DSR) and submit it electronically. The Engineer shall obtain written concurrence from the State prior to proceeding with a design if any questions arise during the design process regarding the applicability of State’s design criteria.

  • Origin Criteria For the goods that meet the origin criteria, the exporter should indicate in Box 8 of this Form, the origin criteria met, in the manner shown in the following table: Circumstances of production or manufacture in the country named in Box 11 of this form: Insert in Box 8

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer develops and manufactures various products for use in the defense, aerospace and security industries. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to expand its operations at various locations throughout California, including El Segundo, Redondo Beach, Palmdale, Sunnyvale, Woodland Hills, Azusa and Rancho Xxxxxxxx. As part of its expansion, Taxpayer will invest in manufacturing equipment, computer and electrical equipment and make tenant improvements to the above facilities. Additionally, Taxpayer will hire full-time employees as part of its expansion (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit “A” (“Milestones”) and must maintain Milestones for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of Full- time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the salaries of any of the Full-time employees hired and retained within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the salary of any full-time employee that is not employed by the taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, Xxxxxxxx agrees that any full-time employee hired after the effective date of this agreement that is a “qualified full-time employee” (as defined in RTC section 23636) shall be excluded from the calculation of the net increase of full-time employees required by this Agreement if Taxpayer claims the credit allowed by RTC section 23636.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.