Project XL Stakeholder Involvement Evalu Sample Clauses

Project XL Stakeholder Involvement Evalu ation—Final Draft Report, May 2000; (2) focus group discussions in July/August 1999 with repre- sentatives of Xxxxxxxx Corporation, Federal and state regulatory agencies, and representatives of the local community; (3) the December 1999 XL Project Progress Report—Andersen Corpora- tion (100-R-00-016); and (4) Andersen Corpora- tion: Project XL Final Project Agreement. XxXx¬➢ v jt tfro¿➢ct Statzs aud {➢szLts ßtLautcc St➢➢L {➢d➢v➢Loμ¬➢ut PHASE ONE PROJECT AGREEMENT SIGNED APRIL 13, 1999 FINAL PROJECT AGREEMENT SIGNED SEPTEMBER 7, 1999 Background The Project Sponsor: Started in 1979, Xxxxxx Development, Inc., is a privately held real estate company located in Atlanta, Georgia. It specializes in property development, financing, brokerage, leas- ing, and management. Xxxxxx has proposed rede- velopment of a 138-acre former steel mill formerly owned by Atlantic Steel, located near Atlanta’s central business district. The proposed redevelop- ment will be a mix of residential and business uses and will include a multimodal (cars, pedestrians, bicycles, mass transit) bridge that will both provide access to Interstates 75 and 85 and connect the site to a nearby Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (XXXXX) station. The Experiment: The Atlantic Steel project will test whether “xxxxxxxxxx” redevelopment xxxxxx- xxxx can be applied to transportation projects, such that air quality and other environmental performance can be improved, as part of an overall community revitalization plan. The Atlanta region is currently not in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone. Between January 1998 and July 2000, the Atlanta region was out of compliance with trans- portation conformity requirements under the Fed- eral Clean Air Act (CAA) because it could not demonstrate that its transportation activities would not exacerbate its air quality problem. The CAA generally prohibits construction of new transporta- tion projects that use Federal funds or require Fed- eral approval in areas that are in a transportation conformity lapse. However, projects that are ex- pected to provide an air quality benefit, called Trans- portation Control Measures (TCMs), can proceed even during a conformity lapse if they are in a Fed- erally approved State Implementation Plan (SIP), which is used to address how the region will con- form to the NAAQS. If the Atlantic Steel site is not redeveloped, the development planned for the site will occur at anot...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Project XL Stakeholder Involvement Evalu

  • Project Team Cooperation Partnering 1.1.3 Constitutional Principles Applicable to State Public Works Projects.

  • Order Coordination and Order Coordination-Time Specific 2.1.9.1 “Order Coordination” (OC) allows BellSouth and Global Connection to coordinate the installation of the SL2 Loops, Unbundled Digital Loops (UDL) and other Loops where OC may be purchased as an option, to Global Connection’s facilities to limit end user service outage. OC is available when the Loop is provisioned over an existing circuit that is currently providing service to the end user. OC for physical conversions will be scheduled at BellSouth’s discretion during normal working hours on the committed due date. OC shall be provided in accordance with the chart set forth below.

  • Project Management Plan 1 3.4.1 Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control 2 activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work.

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

  • Contractor’s Project Manager and Key Personnel Contractor shall appoint a Project Manager to direct the Contractor’s efforts in fulfilling Contractor’s obligations under this Contract. This Project Manager shall be subject to approval by the County and shall not be changed without the written consent of the County’s Project Manager, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Contractor’s Project Manager shall be assigned to this project for the duration of the Contract and shall diligently pursue all work and services to meet the project time lines. The County’s Project Manager shall have the right to require the removal and replacement of the Contractor’s Project Manager from providing services to the County under this Contract. The County’s Project manager shall notify the Contractor in writing of such action. The Contractor shall accomplish the removal within five (5) business days after written notice by the County’s Project Manager. The County’s Project Manager shall review and approve the appointment of the replacement for the Contractor’s Project Manager. The County is not required to provide any additional information, reason or rationale in the event it The County is not required to provide any additional information, reason or rationale in the event it requires the removal of Contractor’s Project Manager from providing further services under the Contract.

  • Change Management Process If Customer or Oracle requests a change in any of the specifications, requirements, Deliverables, or scope (including drawings and designs) of the Professional Services described in any Statement of Work, the party seeking the change shall propose the applicable changes by written notice. Within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of the written notice, each party’s project leads shall meet, either in person or via telephone conference, to discuss and agree upon the proposed changes. Oracle will prepare a change order describing the proposed changes to the Statement of Work and the applicable change in fees and expenses, if any (each, a “Change Order”). Change Orders are not binding unless and until they are executed by both parties. Executed Change Orders shall be deemed part of, and subject to, this Addendum. If the parties disagree about the proposed changes, the parties shall promptly escalate the change request to their respective senior management for resolution.

  • Requirement for Project Planning No physical work will begin on the construction site until the receipt of a Proceed Order issued by the Owner. The Contract assumes that a Proceed Order will be issued in not more than sixty days from the Effective Date of the Contract. Failure of the Contractor to provide the necessary documentation for the issuance of a Proceed Order shall not entitle the Contractor to any extension of time. If a Proceed Order is not issued within sixty days from the award of the Contract and non-issuance is due to nonperformance by the Contractor, the Contractor may be in default.

  • Development cooperation 1. The Parties recognise that development cooperation is a crucial element of their Partnership and an essential factor in the realisation of the objectives of this Agreement as laid down in Article 1. This cooperation can take financial and non-financial forms.

  • Academic Policies and Student Support Services X. Xxxx College courses offered as dual credit, regardless of where they are taught, follow the same syllabus, course outline, textbook, grading method, and other academic policies and procedures as the courses outlined in the Hill College policy manual, catalog, and student handbook. [TAC 19, Part 1, Chapter 4, Subchapter D, 4.85(g)(1)]

  • Training Program It is agreed that there shall be an Apprenticeship Training Program, the provisions of which are set forth in Exhibit "C", which is attached hereto and forms part of this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.