Project Selection and Peer Review Sample Clauses

Project Selection and Peer Review. Under grant DTRT12-G-UTC08, 87 research projects have been selected from federal fiscal year (FY) 2012 and 2013 funds. All projects have been selected through a peer review process that reflects substantial input and matching resources from state departments of transportation and other transportation agencies in the region. The projects selected under grant DTRT12-G-UTC08 are listed in Tables 1-7, under the primary strategic goal addressed by the project. Please note that many of the projects address several goals simultaneously. In particular, many projects that address State of Good Repair have potential Safety and Economic Competiveness benefits.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Project Selection and Peer Review. Under grant DTRT12-G-UTC08, 46 research projects have been selected from federal fiscal year (FY) 2011 funds—which were received in 2012. An additional 36 research projects have been selected from FY 2012 funds—which were received in 2013. Additional projects are currently being selected from FY 2012 funds to address critical issues in the Xxxxxx, using match provided by the North Dakota legislature. All projects have been (and will be) selected through a peer review process that reflects substantial input and matching resources from state departments of transportation and other transportation agencies in the region. The projects selected under grant DTRT12-G-UTC08 are listed in Tables 1-6, under the primary strategic goal addressed by the project. Please note that many of the projects address several goals simultaneously. In particular, many projects that address State of Good Repair have potential Safety and Economic Competiveness benefits. Table 1: MPC Research Projects Most Directly Correlated with Safety 1. MPC-354: Geotechnical Limit to Scour at Spill-through Abutments (Year 2) 2. MPC-363: A Two-stage Approach for Estimating a Statewide Truck Trip Table 3. MPC-366: Structural Health Monitoring of Highway Bridges Subjected to Overweight Trucks, Phase I– Instrumentation Development and Validation 4. MPC-367: Developing Statistical Models for Crash Severity Comparing Statewide, County and IndianReservation Roads 5. MPC-368: Effectiveness of Advisory Letter in Preventing At-Risk Teen Driver Crashes: Pilot Project 6. MPC-369: ND Motor Crash Analysis and Rider Assessment for Improved Conspicuity 7. MPC-370: Anticipatory Guidance for Older Drivers 8. MPC-371: Decision Support for Strategic Truck Safety and Weight Enforcement Planning 9. MPC-373: Damage Assessment, Characterization, and Modeling for Enhanced Design of Concrete Table 1: MPC Research Projects Most Directly Correlated with Safety Bridge Decks in Cold Regions

Related to Project Selection and Peer Review

  • Committee Composition and Selection 1. The committee shall be comprised of eight members as follows: • five Teachers • three administrators

  • Course Curriculum, Instruction, and Grading X. Xxxx College courses offered as dual credit, regardless of where they are taught, follow the same syllabus, course outline, textbook, grading method, and other academic policies as the courses outlined in the Hill College catalog.

  • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Capability The wind plant shall provide SCADA capability to transmit data and receive instructions from the ISO and/or the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, as applicable, to protect system reliability. The Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected and the wind plant Developer shall determine what SCADA information is essential for the proposed wind plant, taking into account the size of the plant and its characteristics, location, and importance in maintaining generation resource adequacy and transmission system reliability in its area.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • POST ONLINE PUBLIC AUCTION PROCEDURES 4.1. Successful E-bidders shall and undertake to sign the Memorandum of Sale at the office of the Auctioneer within 3 working days from the date of auction, failing which the deposit paid will be forfeited to the Assignee bank and the sale will be deemed cancelled/terminated and the property may be put up again for subsequent auction without further notice to the said E-Bidders. The Auctioneer shall send the Memorandum of Sale for stamping and thereafter forward the same together with the required deposit paid under Clause 2.4 above and the differential sum paid under this clause (if any) to the Assignee bank.

  • Provisioning of High Frequency Spectrum and Splitter Space 3.2.1 BellSouth will provide <<customer_name>> with access to the High Frequency Spectrum as follows:

  • Modifications and Updates to the Wire Center List and Subsequent Transition Periods 2.1.4.12.1 In the event BellSouth identifies additional wire centers that meet the criteria set forth in Section 2.1.4.5, but that were not included in the Initial Wire Center List, BellSouth shall include such additional wire centers in a carrier notification letter (CNL). Each such list of additional wire centers shall be considered a “Subsequent Wire Center List”.

  • Selection of projects and financial parameters 4.1 Open calls and availability of funds (including number of calls, duration of calls, and estimated size):

  • SITE VISITS AND RECORD REVIEW The Applicant shall allow authorized employees of the District, the Comptroller, the Appraisal District, and the State Auditor’s Office to have reasonable access to the Applicant’s Qualified Property and business records from the Application Review Start Date through the Final Termination Date, in order to inspect the project to determine compliance with the terms hereof or as necessary to properly appraise the Taxable Value of the Applicant’s Qualified Property.

  • TESTING OF THE BCDR PLAN The Service Provider shall test the BCDR Plan on a regular basis (and in any event not less than once in every Contract Year). Subject to paragraph 6.2, the Purchaser may require the Service Provider to conduct additional tests of some or all aspects of the BCDR Plan at any time where the Purchaser considers it necessary, including where there has been any change to the Services or any underlying business processes, or on the occurrence of any event which may increase the likelihood of the need to implement the BCDR Plan. If the Purchaser requires an additional test of the BCDR Plan, it shall give the Service Provider written notice and the Service Provider shall conduct the test in accordance with the Purchaser's requirements and the relevant provisions of the BCDR Plan. The Service Provider's costs of the additional test shall be borne by the Purchaser unless the BCDR Plan fails the additional test in which case the Service Provider's costs of that failed test shall be borne by the Service Provider. The Service Provider shall undertake and manage testing of the BCDR Plan in full consultation with the Purchaser and shall liaise with the Purchaser in respect of the planning, performance, and review, of each test, and shall comply with the reasonable requirements of the Purchaser in this regard. Each test shall be carried out under the supervision of the Purchaser or its nominee. The Service Provider shall ensure that any use by it or any Sub-contractor of “live” data in such testing is first approved with the Purchaser. Copies of live test data used in any such testing shall be (if so required by the Purchaser) destroyed or returned to the Purchaser on completion of the test. The Service Provider shall, within twenty (20) Working Days of the conclusion of each test, provide to the Purchaser a report setting out: the outcome of the test; any failures in the BCDR Plan (including the BCDR Plan's procedures) revealed by the test; and the Service Provider's proposals for remedying any such failures. Following each test, the Service Provider shall take all measures requested by the Purchaser, (including requests for the re-testing of the BCDR Plan) to remedy any failures in the BCDR Plan and such remedial activity and re-testing shall be completed by the Service Provider, at no additional cost to the Purchaser, by the date reasonably required by the Purchaser and set out in such notice. For the avoidance of doubt, the carrying out of a test of the BCDR Plan (including a test of the BCDR Plan’s procedures) shall not relieve the Service Provider of any of its obligations under this Contract. The Service Provider shall also perform a test of the BCDR Plan in the event of any major reconfiguration of the Services or as otherwise reasonably requested by the Purchaser.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.