PROJECT REVIEW AND PERMITTING PROCESS Sample Clauses

PROJECT REVIEW AND PERMITTING PROCESS. The Work Group has agreed on a comprehensive Project Review and Permitting Process. This new process is intended to stimulate fundamental changes in the way flood damage reduction projects are planned and in the system for permitting those projects. This process applies to projects that address substantial water management or resource management problems and/or that would benefit from early and on-going stakeholder communication and collaboration. Flood damage reduction projects in the Basin are subject to a permitting system based on both state and federal law. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers St. Xxxx District has federal regulatory authority, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency have state regulatory authority, over most flood damage reduction and natural resource development projects in the Red River Basin. In addition, the Corps of Engineers has responsibility for adherence to National Environmental Policy Act requirements, and state and local agencies have responsibility for adherence to Minnesota Environmental Policy Act requirements as they apply to specific projects. The agencies as stated in the cumulative EIS (Section 6.4.1c) agreed to do joint processing for projects in the Red River Basin. The Work Group recognizes that the permitting process for flood damage reduction projects has become a forum for conflicts over important interests and public policy goals in the Basin. Stakeholders perceive a lack of certainty and finality for permit requirements and experience costly delays in responding to information requests. Stakeholders seek clarity from state agencies about their policy goals and a commitment to permitting timelines. They also seek some mechanism for making informed decisions about resource allocation that reflect the likelihood of project approval by permitting agencies. Agencies seek cooperation from stakeholders in harmonizing natural resource protection and enhancement with flood damage reduction. Public interest groups have felt excluded from the project planning process in watershed districts and from state agency permit evaluation and decision making. These groups seek expanded involvement in the project planning and permitting process. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must protect its regulatory independence, but recognizes the potential benefits of early coordination and planning of flood damage reduction projects that is consistent with federal law. Before the Corps of Eng...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to PROJECT REVIEW AND PERMITTING PROCESS

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment In all solicitation, either by competitive bidding or negotiation, made by the Contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential Subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Contractor of the Contractor’s obligations under this Agreement and the Regulations relative to non-discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

  • Project Documentation All documentation provided to the City other than Project drawings shall be furnished on a Microsoft compatible compact disc.

  • Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Engineer for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Engineer of the Engineer's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract.

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • Product Documentation You should review the policy documents carefully to ensure they accurately reflect the cover, conditions, limits, and other terms that you require. Particular attention should be paid to policy conditions and warranties as failure to comply with these could invalidate your policy. It is important that you retain and keep safely all documents associated with your policy so that you can refer to them in the event of a claim.

  • Final Project Report Prepare a Final Project Report that addresses, to the extent feasible, comments made by the Grant Manager on the Draft Final Project Report. Submit one (1) reproducible master and an electronic copy of the final. Upload an electronic copy of the final report in pdf format to the FAAST system.

  • Solicitations for Subcontractors, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, sex, age, and disability/handicap.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.