Program/Production Reviews Sample Clauses

Program/Production Reviews. The Production Readiness Review (PRR) will be conducted by the Government to ensure the Contractor has accomplished adequate production planning and preparations to produce LCU and associated components that meet performance requirements in accordance with the contract schedules and without unacceptable risks. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of:  Production, Procurement and Material Issues  Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement  Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path  Make-or-Buy Program ChangesRisk Analysis Activities  Quality Program StatusDefect Reduction Program Status  Manufacturing Planning;  Manufacturing Schedules;  Configuration Management;  Quality Assurance;  Material Procurement & Supplier Control;  Facility and Equipment;  Production Processing & Fabrication;  Calibration, Tool and Test Equipment;  Non-Conforming Material Control  Completed Item Inspection and Test;  Handling, Storage and Delivery The Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to manufacture and test the LCU and associated components by providing various documents to include, but not be limited to, Manufacturing, Testing, Quality Assurance, Configuration Management, Calibration, and Supplier Management Plans. Policies, procedures, processes & plans demonstrating production processing & fabrication capability, facilities & equipment capacity, production scheduling, manpower resources & training, supplier management, parts & material procurement and shop loading will also be required. On-Site examination of the plans/documents described above, as well as examination of the manufacturing equipment and facility, review of support functions/groups, and interviews with project personnel, are all integral parts of the PRR. Processes must be able to produce repeatable conforming hardware within time constraints of the contract. During the PRR, the Contractor shall be prepared to discuss manufacturing & procurement planning status, issues, problems, risks and schedules associated with the production program, and provide requested supporting objective evidence. A successful review is predicated on the Government’s determination that there are no unacceptable risks, performance & quality requirements are fully met in the production configuration, and production capability demonstrates a satisfactory basis for proceeding into production. The Government in its sole discretion will determine wh...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Program/Production Reviews. The contractor shall hold program reviews commencing after contract award which shall cover progress, schedules and problems. These reviews will be used to assess the contractor’s progress and status. During these reviews, the contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of:  Production, procurement and material issues;  Risk analysis activities;  Quality program status;  Defect reduction program status;  Safety program status;  Configuration management activities;  GFP status; and  Delivery schedules. For planning purposes, the program review location will be at the contractor’s facility. The contractor shall also conduct management meetings regarding delivery on a regular basis (to be mutually agreed upon between the Government and contractor) between the program reviews. The meetings will be conducted via teleconference or at the contractor’s facility. The contractor shall provide presentation material in accordance with CDRL A008. The Government shall reserve and exercise the right to hold additional informal reviews at mutually convenient times to follow progress and problems, which may exist. Attendance at program reviews may include Government personnel, Government support service contractor personnel, and other Government representatives as appropriate (contractor personnel are not permitted for all reviews addressing matters pertaining to competitive contracting and actual pricing).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Program/Production Reviews. The Production Readiness Review (PRR) will be conducted by the Government to ensure the Contractor has accomplished adequate production planning and preparations to produce MTP and associated cables that meet performance requirements in accordance with the contract schedules and without unacceptable risks. During PRR, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of: • Producibility; • Manufacturing Planning; • Manufacturing Schedules; • Configuration Management; • Quality Assurance; • Material Procurement & Supplier Control; • Facility and Equipment; • Production Processing & Fabrication; • Calibration, Tool and Test Equipment; • Non-Conforming Material Control • Completed Item Inspection and Test; • Handling, Storage and Delivery The Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to manufacture and test the MTP and associated cables by providing various documents to include, but not be limited to, Manufacturing, Testing, Quality Assurance, Configuration Management, Calibration, and Supplier Management Plans. Policies, procedures, processes & plans demonstrating production processing & fabrication capability, facilities & equipment capacity, production scheduling, manpower resources & training, supplier management, parts & material procurement and shop loading will also be required. On-Site examination of the plans/documents described above, as well as examination of the manufacturing equipment and facility, review of support functions/groups, and interviews with project personnel, are all integral parts of the PRR. Processes must be able to produce repeatable conforming hardware within time constraints of the contract. During the PRR, the Contractor shall be prepared to discuss manufacturing & procurement planning status, issues, problems, risks and schedules associated with the production program, and provide requested supporting objective evidence. A successful review is predicated on the Government’s determination that there are no unacceptable risks, performance & quality requirements are fully met in the production configuration, and production capability demonstrates a satisfactory basis for proceeding into production. The Government in its sole discretion will determine whether the PRRs are successful. The Government will provide a report summarizing the proceedings and identifying deficiencies and issues, as applicable. The Contractor shall provide a written response within 30 working days that addresses all identified defici...
Sample 1

Related to Program/Production Reviews

  • Annual Production Program document describing the forecasts for Production and handling of Oil, Gas, water, special fluids, and waste arising from the Production process of each Development Area or Field.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Program Components Activities and services delivered under this Program Element align with Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities, as defined in Oregon’s Public Health Modernization Manual, (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/oha/PH/ABOUT/TASKFORCE/Documents/public_health_modernization_man ual.pdf) as well as with public health accountability outcome and process metrics (if applicable) as follows:

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.