Professional Growth and Evaluation Domains Sample Clauses

Professional Growth and Evaluation Domains. The parties agree that a model of professional growth and evaluation shall be used to assess each ancillary staff employee’s performance and effectiveness that is largely based on the work of Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx. It assesses each ancillary staff employee’s competence and progress in meeting performance standards within five distinct domains of professional practice: Domain 1) Planning and Preparation, Domain 2) Classroom Environment, Domain 3) Instruction, Domain 4) Professional Responsibilities, and Domain 5) Student Growth Indicators. Each domain has multiple components and elements, with rubrics for assessing a teacher’s strength and ability within each element. A weighted matrix will be used to summarize the ancillary staff employee’s scores from all of these domains in order to arrive at an overall rating of teacher effectiveness, or a final “performance rating”. Domain 1, Domain 2, and Domain 3 shall be weighted at twenty percent (20%) each, Domain 4 shall be weighted at fifteen percent (15%), and Domain 5 shall be weighted at twenty-five percent (25%).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Professional Growth and Evaluation Domains. The parties agree that a model of professional growth and evaluation shall be used to assess each teacher’s performance and effectiveness that is largely based on the work of Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx. It assesses each teacher’s competence and progress in meeting performance standards within five distinct domains of professional practice: Domain 1) Planning and Preparation, Domain 2) Classroom Environment, Domain 3) Instruction, Domain 4) Professional Responsibilities, and Domain 5) Student Growth Indicators. Each domain has multiple components and elements, with rubrics for assessing a teacher’s strength and ability within each element. A weighted matrix will be used to summarize the teacher’s scores from all of these domains in order to arrive at an overall rating of teacher effectiveness, or a final “performance rating”. Domain 1, Domain 2, and Domain 3 shall be weighted at twenty percent (20%) each, Domain 4 shall be weighted at fifteen percent (15%), and Domain 5 shall be weighted at twenty-five percent (25%). For the 2011-2012 PLAS grant schools, the student assessment portion of Domain 5 shall be fifteen percent (15%) and ten percent (10%) shall be given to the balance of Domain 5. Where a state-wide assessment exists for the teacher’s subject or grade level, that assessment shall be one of the measures used, along with other comparable, rigorous measures approved by the principal in conjunction with the leadership team.
Sample 1

Related to Professional Growth and Evaluation Domains

  • Professional Growth Plan A written plan, self-directed or jointly developed between the teacher and evaluator, designed for the sole purpose of continuing teacher growth focused on areas identified in the teacher’s observations and/or evaluation. The approved form for the Professional Growth Plan is found at Ohio ES.

  • Professional Growth Professional growth is the continuous purposeful engagement in study and related activities designed to retain and extend the high standards of classified unit members.

  • Professional Growth and Improvement Plans A. Professional growth and improvement plans shall be developed as follows:

  • Professional Growth Program There shall be a Professional Growth Program in place for all classified employees. Professional Growth is an organized activity designed to improve performance of employees in the classified service and to provide training for employees to gain new skills and abilities, to broaden their opportunity for promotion, to engage in study and related activities designed to retain and extend the high standards of the classified employee.

  • Teacher Professional Growth Plan 9.1.1 Teacher Professional Growth Plans will consider but will not be required to include the School Division’s goals.

  • Enterprise Information Management Standards Grantee shall conform to HHS standards for data management as described by the policies of the HHS Office of Data, Analytics, and Performance. These include, but are not limited to, standards for documentation and communication of data models, metadata, and other data definition methods that are required by HHS for ongoing data governance, strategic portfolio analysis, interoperability planning, and valuation of HHS System data assets.

  • PROFESSIONAL GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE A. A claim by a teacher, the Association, or the Board of Education that there has been a violation, misinterpretation or misapplication of specific provisions of this Agreement may be processed as a grievance as hereinafter provided.

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

  • Electronic and Information Resources Accessibility and Security Standards a. Applicability: The following Electronic and Information Resources (“EIR”) requirements apply to the Contract because the Grantee performs services that include EIR that the System Agency's employees are required or permitted to access or members of the public are required or permitted to access. This Section does not apply to incidental uses of EIR in the performance of the Agreement, unless the Parties agree that the EIR will become property of the State of Texas or will be used by HHSC’s clients or recipients after completion of the Agreement. Nothing in this section is intended to prescribe the use of particular designs or technologies or to prevent the use of alternative technologies, provided they result in substantially equivalent or greater access to and use of a Product.

  • Job Evaluation Plan (a) The Employer agrees that no job evaluation plan pertaining to positions covered by this Agreement will be introduced without the mutual agreement of the Parties.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.