Production Status 3 Sample Clauses

Production Status 3. 1 Gyártási állapot Each IBM Machine is manufactured from parts that may be new or used. In some cases, a Machine may not be new and may have been previously installed. Regardless, IBM’s appropriate warranty terms apply. Minden IBM Gép xx, xxxx xx xx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx. Xxxxxx esetben előfordulhat, hogy a Gép nem új, és esetleg korábban már üzembe helyezték. Az IBM meg- felelő szavatossági feltételei a Gép gyártási állapotától függetlenül is érvényesek.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Production Status 3

  • Certification Status The Engineer certifies that it is not:

  • PRODUCTION STANDARDS The Company may establish minimum production standards applicable to Representative.

  • Mission Statement a. Employees are the most valuable resource in the City’s effective and efficient delivery of services to the public. The parties have a commitment to prevent drug or alcohol impairment in the workplace and to xxxxxx and maintain a drug and alcohol free work environment. The parties also have a mutual interest in preventing accidents and injuries on the job and, by doing so, protecting the health and safety of employees, co-workers, and the public.

  • Registration Statement The Registration Statement shall have become effective under the Securities Act and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement shall have been issued and no proceedings for that purpose shall have been initiated or threatened by the SEC.

  • Problem/ Solution Statement Problem California’s forest health crisis is an emergency of unprecedented scope and scale, with disastrous implications for the state’s environment, economy, energy systems, and human life. Unlike essentially all other technologies and solutions proposed to respond to the crisis, gasification has the potential to process forest waste in a way that extracts value and sequesters a large portion of its carbon. Before the recipient’s development of the pre- commercial Powertainer technology, no one had developed gasification technology that could economically respond to the problem. As a result, there have not yet been any large-scale deployments of distributed, commercial-scale gasification technology. The acceleration of tree mortality and persistent drought conditions make finding solutions to this problem more critical with each passing day.

  • Reformulation Standard “Reformulated Products” shall mean Products that contain concentrations less than or equal to 0.1% (1,000 parts per million (ppm)) of DEHP when analyzed pursuant to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency testing methodologies 3580A and 8270C or other methodology utilized by federal or state government agencies for the purpose of determining the phthalate content in a solid substance.

  • CERTIFICATION STATEMENT Under Section 231.006, Family Code, the vendor or applicant certifies that the individual or business entity named in this contract, bid, or application is not ineligible to receive the specified grant, loan, or payment and acknowledges that this contract may be terminated and payment may be withheld if this certification is inaccurate. The contractor understands that it is the contractor’s responsibility to verify whether a child support obligor who is more than 30 days delinquent is the sole proprietor, partner, shareholder or owner with an ownership interest of at least 25%.

  • Reformulation Standards A “reformulated” product (a) contains lead in concentrations that do not exceed 90 parts per million, equivalent to 0.009%, in any exterior parts analyzed pursuant to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) methodologies 3050B and 6010B, or (b) yields a result of no more than 1.0 micrograms of lead when sampled according to NIOSH 9100 protocol and analyzed according to EPA 6010B. In addition to the above tests, the Settling Entity may use equivalent methods utilized by any California or federal agency to determine lead content in a solid substance or the amount of the bioavailability of the toxicant through a wipe test, respectively.

  • Construction Staking Contractor shall avoid careless or negligent damage to construction stakes, flags, or marks. If such damage occurs, Contractor shall be required to replace stakes necessary to construc- tion. Contractor’s replacement staking shall be approved by Forest Service. Alternatively, upon Contractor’s request, Contracting Officer may agree to perform such work under E.2.1.8. When A.7 shows that construction stakes are to be set by Forest Service after clearing, Contractor shall submit to Forest Service a written schedule for clearing, construction staking, and construction that will provide Forest Service a reasonable period for setting construction stakes. Time for setting construction stakes may be modified by written agreement. If Forest Service performs construction staking for Specified Roads, timing of such staking shall permit Contrac- tor’s clearing and other construction activity to proceed without hindrance or delay, provided Contractor’s construction activity is reasonably consistent with needs identified in Contractor’s Operating Schedule or amendments thereto. Should Forest Service be unable to perform construction staking in such reasonable period, upon written agree- ment, Contractor shall assume the responsibility for construction staking for agreed upon portions of Specified Roads. In such event, Contracting Officer shall revise:

  • LITIGATION STATEMENT CHECK ONE [ ] The undersigned bidder has had no litigation and/or judgments entered against it by any local, state or federal entity and has had no litigation and/or judgments entered against such entities during the past ten (10) years. [ ] The undersigned bidder, BY ATTACHMENT TO THIS FORM, submits a summary and disposition of individual cases of litigation and/or judgments entered by or against any local, state or federal entity, by any state or federal court, during the past ten (10) years. COMPANY NAME AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) TITLE Failure to check the appropriate blocks above may result in disqualification of your bid. Likewise, failure to provide documentation of a possible conflict of interest, or a summary of past litigation and/or judgments, may result in disqualification of your bid. E VERIFICATION CERTIFICATION Contract No.Y20-1058-MV I hereby certify that I will utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s E-Verify system in accordance with the terms governing the use of the system to confirm the employment eligibility of the individuals classified below. In accordance with s. 837.06, Florida Statutes, I understand and acknowledge that whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his or her official duties shall be guilty of a misdemeanor in the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, Florida statutes. All persons, including subcontractors and their workforce, who will perform work under Contract No.Y20-1058-MV, Heavy Equipment Parts and Labor, within the state of Florida. NAME OF CONTRACTOR: ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: TITLE: DATE: RELATIONSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM FOR USE WITH PROCUREMENT ITEMS, EXCEPT THOSE WHERE THE COUNTY IS THE PRINCIPAL OR PRIMARY BIDDER For procurement items that will come before the Board of County Commissioners for final approval, this form shall be completed by the Bidder and shall be submitted to the Procurement Division by the Bidder. In the event any information provided on this form should change, the Bidder must file an amended form on or before the date the item is considered by the appropriate board or body. Part I INFORMATION ON BIDDER: Legal Name of Bidder: Business Address (Street/P.O. Box, City and Zip Code): Business Phone: ( ) Facsimile: ( ) INFORMATION ON XXXXXX’S AUTHORIZED AGENT, IF APPLICABLE: (Agent Authorization Form also required to be attached) Name of Bidder’s Authorized Agent: Business Address (Street/P.O. Box, City and Zip Code): Business Phone: ( ) Facsimile: ( ) Part II IS THE BIDDER A RELATIVE OF THE MAYOR OR ANY MEMBER OF THE BCC? YES NO IS THE MAYOR OR ANY MEMBER OF THE BCC THE BIDDER’S EMPLOYEE? YES NO IS THE BIDDER OR ANY PERSON WITH A DIRECT BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME OF THIS MATTER A BUSINESS ASSOCIATE OF THE MAYOR OR ANY MEMBER OF THE BCC? YES NO If you responded “YES” to any of the above questions, please state with whom and explain the relationship. (Use additional sheets of paper if necessary) Part III

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.