Procurement Approach Sample Clauses

Procurement Approach. This procurement was handled in accordance with OCTA’s procedures for public works and construction projects, which conform to federal and state requirements. Public works projects are handled as sealed bids and award is made to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Invitation for Bids 0-1619 was released to the public on June 28, 2010, through OCTA’s CAMM NET system, with electronic notification sent to 1,889 firms. The project was advertised in a newspaper of general circulation on June 28 and July 5, 2010. A pre-bid conference and site visit was held on July 6, 2010, and was attended by 15 firms. Two addenda were issued to provide additional bid instructions, provide a list of attendees, and extend the bid due date. An additional site walk at all four bases was held on July 14, 2010. On August 3, 2010, eight sealed bids were received. Bids were reviewed by staff from both the Contracts Administration and Materials Management and Rail Programs departments to ensure compliance with the contract terms and conditions, technical specifications, and drawings. Upon evaluation of the received bids, the three apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidders are presented below. Firm and Location Base Bid Price Alternate 1 Total Price Xxx Xxxxx Electric, Inc. Stanton, California $1,267,196 $16,000 $1,283,196 KDC, Inc. dba Dynalectric Los Alamitos, California $1,343,263 $27,059 $1,370,322 FEI Enterprises, Inc. Los Angeles, California $1,498,000 $60,000 $1,558,000 The apparent low bidder, Xxx Xxxxx Electric, Inc., submitted a written request to withdraw its bid, citing a clerical error during preparation of the bid. The request for withdrawal of the bid was reviewed by XXXX’s General Counsel and concurrence was provided for the withdrawal of the bid in accordance with the California Public Contract Code Section 5103. The award is being made to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, KDC, Inc., dba Dynalectric. The engineer’s estimate for this project is $1,297,130. The recommended firm’s base bid exceeds the engineer’s estimate by 3.6 percent. This is due to the increase of specialty material costs. The bid is considered by staff to be fair and reasonable. Staff recommends award of the contract for security system upgrades at the Anaheim, Garden Grove, Irvine Construction Circle, and Irvine Sand Canyon bus bases to KDC Systems, Inc., dba Dynalectric, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in an amount not to exceed $1,370,322, which is inclusive of the a...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Procurement Approach. 1. Given the intent to procure a SaaS based solutions, vendors are not asked to respond to a detailed technical specification as these may differ between solutions. Vendors will be asked to describe how their solution addresses The City’s operational and customer experience objectives and describe their service offering with respect to service levels, approach to customer experience, and approach to project management and delivery.
Sample 1
Procurement Approach. This procurement was handled in accordance with OCTA’s procedures for public works and construction projects, which conform to federal and state requirements. Public works projects are handled as sealed bids and award is made to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Invitation for Bids 0-1662 was released on October 25, 2010, and posted on CAMM NET with an electronic notification being sent to 2,364 firms. The project was advertised on October 29 and November 2, 2010, in a newspaper of general circulation. A pre-bid conference was held on November 3, 2010, and was attended by 35 firms. Four addenda were issued to update drawings, replace exhibits, provide the list of attendees at the pre-bid conference, and to respond to questions. On December 8, 2010, eight bids were received and publicly opened. All bids were reviewed by staff from the Highway Project Delivery Department and the Contracts Administration and Materials Management Department to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions, specifications, and drawings. The three lowest responsive, responsible bidders and the bid amounts for the construction of the Sand Canyon Avenue Railroad Grade Separation Project are identified below. State law requires award to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Firm and Location Bid Price
Sample 1
Procurement Approach. In relation to procurement, the General Conditions emphasize: - Use of the Borrower’s/Recipient’s procurement regulations, provided they are deemed to be consistent with IFAD’s guidelines; and - The increased importance of the project procurement plan in identifying procurement procedures to be followed by the Borrower/Recipient to ensure consistency during implementation (Procurement Guidelines, paragraph 45).
Sample 1
Procurement Approach. This RFQ seeks one or more contractor(s) to conduct BPR and TCM services. The RFQ is split into two parts, BPR and TCM. As such, there are separate deliverable tables. Further details on the response submission requirements are provided in Section 19.0 of this RFQ.
Sample 1
Procurement Approach. This procurement was handled in accordance with OCTA’s procedures for public works and construction projects, which conform to federal and state requirements. Public works projects are handled as sealed bids and award is made to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. On May 24, 2010, the Board approved the release of Invitation for Bids (IFB) 0-1529 for the construction of a parking structure at the Tustin Metrolink Station. On June 1, 2010, IFB 0-1529 was released and sent electronically to 1,663 contractors registered on CAMM NET. The project was advertised on June 1, 2010 and June 9, 2010, in a newspaper of general circulation. A pre-bid conference and site visit was held on June 10, 2010, with 39 attendees representing 38 firms. Four addenda were issued to clarify project specifications, provide the list of attendees at the pre-bid conference, extend the bid due date, and include incentive language for early substantial completion. On July 12, 2010, 17 bids were received. All bids were reviewed by staff from the Rail Programs Division and Contracts Administration and Materials Management Department to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions, specifications, and drawings. The three lowest responsive, responsible bidders for the construction of a parking structure at the Tustin Metrolink Station are identified below. State law requires award to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Base Bid Price Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Total Price $9,922,300 $450,000 $120,000 $10,492,300 $11,587,000 $690,000 $11,600 $12,288,600 $11,873,780 $789,000 $40,000 $12,702,780 Firm and Location
Sample 1
Procurement Approach. This procurement was handled in accordance with OCTA’s procedures for competitive bids. These projects are handled as a sealed bid and award is made to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. On July 15, 2010, Invitation for Bids (IFB) No. 0-1652 was released and sent electronically to 107 firms registered on CAMM NET. The project was advertised on July 15, 2010 and July 22, 2010, in a newspaper of general circulation. A pre-bid conference was held on July 22, 2010, and was attended by seven firms. Two addenda were issued to provide the list of attendees at the pre-bid conference, to respond to questions received, and to post administrative changes. On August 12, 2010, eight bids were received. All bids were reviewed by staff from the Maintenance and the Contracts Administration and Materials Management departments to ensure compliance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the IFB. The three lowest responsive, responsible bidders for hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste transportation and disposal are identified below. Firm and Location Bid Price
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Procurement Approach. This procurement was handled in accordance with OCTA’s sole source procurement procedures which provide for professional and technical services. HASTUS is proprietary software developed and sold exclusively by GIRO. HASTUS is a complete software package for bus scheduling, crew scheduling, and customer trip planning. This upgrade will allow GIRO to migrate the application, configuration, and data from version 2006 to version 2010 and includes all improvements made by GIRO since the last upgrade. This is a federally funded procurement. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines allow for sole source procurements under certain circumstances. The HASTUS software is a proprietary product with data rights restrictions. Therefore, it meets the FTA guidelines as the software is available from only one source and no other supplier can meet the requirements. The contract is a firm-fixed price, in the amount of $242,113, for a two-year term. Due to the fact that this is a sole source request over $50,000, OCTA’s Internal Audit department has conducted a price review and has deemed the price quoted by GIRO to be fair and reasonable. Based on the above and given the proprietary nature of GIRO’s product, this award is recommended to GIRO. Fiscal Impact The project was approved in OCTA’s Fiscal Year 2010-11 Budget, Finance and Administration/Information Systems, Account 1285-7519-IX015-AA2, and is grant funded through CA-90-Y697. Summary Based on the information provided, staff recommends award of Agreement No. C-0-1668 to GIRO, in the amount of $242,113, for the HASTUS version 2010 upgrade.
Sample 1

Related to Procurement Approach

  • Project Approach € Project schedules and budgets are reviewed by the Project Manager on a weekly basis during our company-wide Project Managers Meeting using project status reports generated by our control software (Deltek Vision). Progress is compared to the schedule and budget to ensure adequate resources are available and that necessary coordination is occurring. Costs are reported real time, with actual labor based on time sheet entry and actual expense costs based on invoices. The reporting system can be customized to track specific tasks or efforts in multiple categories, making it flexible enough to adapt to any project specific requirements. We hold regular project coordination meetings to facilitate communication and information transfer among the design team. These meetings are held weekly and are supplemented with e-mail communication, as well as telephone conversations. We hold monthly project status meetings with your project manager to update project status, discuss priorities, and receive direction from City staff. This provides an opportunity for communication and information to flow openly between the City and the design team. These meetings are supplemented by communications that will occur via e-mail and telephone. We conduct meetings with other agencies and stakeholders impacted by the work as needed. E-mail and telephone communication work well for quick questions or minor issues, but we have found that the most effective means of communication with other agencies and stakeholders is the “old-fashioned” face- to-face mexxxxx. Xxbble’s record of providing quality civil engineering services to our clients reflects our ability to manage multiple projects effectively and efficiently. Our philosophy is that each project is personally overseen by one of our principal officers, thereby providing immediate attention to all project aspects (i.e. negotiations, communications, schedule, budgets).

  • General Approach The parties will strive to achieve on-going performance improvement. They will follow a proactive, collaborative and responsive approach to performance management and improvement. Either party may request a meeting at any time. The parties will use their best efforts to meet as soon as possible following a request.

  • Contractor Licensing, etc. Notwithstanding Section 14.c, District may terminate this Contract immediately by written notice to Contractor upon denial, suspension, revocation, or non-renewal of any license, permit, or certificate that Contractor must hold to provide services under this Contract.

  • Settlement Approval The approval of the Master Servicer need not be requested for disposition of insurance loss settlements and the Servicer may disburse the loss proceeds as provided herein.

  • Procurement All goods, works and services required for the Project and to be financed out of the proceeds of the Financing shall be procured in accordance with the provisions of Section III of Schedule 2 to the Financing Agreement.

  • FAA APPROVAL This Agreement may be subject to approval of the FAA. If the FAA disapproves this Agreement, it will become null and void, and both Parties will bear their own expenses relative to this Agreement, up to the date of disapproval.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.