Process for Review of Decisions Sample Clauses

Process for Review of Decisions. The change process may include a process for review of decisions, which will be in addition to the employment relation problem resolution provisions in this Collective Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Process for Review of Decisions. The change process may include a process for review of decisions, which will be in addition to the employment relation problem resolution provisions in this Collective Agreement. Individual reconfirmation Reconfirmation requires the following criteria to be satisfied:  Either o the extent of change on an individual employee’s role is not significant, or o there is no significant difference between a new role created as a result of the change when compared to the pre-existing role;  The salary for the changed or new role is the same (or greater);  The changed or new role has terms and conditions of employment (including career prospects) which are no less favourable; and  The location of the changed or new role is the same, though not necessarily in the same building and/or the same street. Reconfirmation may be to a position in:  MPI; or  another existing agency; or  a new structure or agency established as part of the change. Where there is one clear candidate for reconfirmation in a changed or new role, and the reconfirmation criteria are met, then that employee will be reconfirmed in the role. Where the reconfirmation criteria are met for more than one candidate, then the employees will be asked to advise expressions of preference and either:  An appointment from amongst the candidates will be made, using standard MPI appointment procedures; or  Another agreed and practicable appointment process will be used. If an employee meets all the criteria for reconfirmation (or is selected through a contested process) but does not want to accept the position, then the alternatives are leave without pay or resignation. An employee may wish to raise an employment relationship problem in relation to an aspect of the reconfirmation process. In that light:  The change process may prescribe a specific process for review of decisions;  In any event the employee may rely upon the problem resolution provisions of this Collective Agreement.

Related to Process for Review of Decisions

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWS We may provide you areas on the Site to leave reviews or ratings. When posting a review, you must comply with the following criteria:

  • REQUEST FOR REVIEW Within sixty (60) days after receiving notice from the Plan Administrator that a claim has been denied (in part or all of the claim), then claimant (or their duly authorized representative) may file with the Plan Administrator, a written request for a review of the denial of the claim. The claimant (or his duly authorized representative) shall then have the opportunity to submit written comments, documents, records and other information relating to the claim. The Plan Administrator shall also provide the claimant, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant (as defined in applicable ERISA regulations) to the claimant’s claim for benefits.

  • Finality of Decisions There shall be no appeal from any Arbitration Board's decision. Each such decision shall be final and binding on the Union and its members, the employee or employees involved, and the Company. The Union will discourage any attempt of its members, and will not encourage or co-operate with any of its members in any appeal to any Court or Labour Board from a decision of an Arbitration Board.

  • LIS Forecasting 7.2.2.8.1 Both CLEC and Qwest shall work in good faith to define a mutually agreed upon forecast of LIS trunking.

  • ARBITRATION - SCHEDULING Timely complaints shall be submitted to and determined by an arbitrator. Each arbitration proceeding shall commence not earlier than ten (10) calendar days and not later than thirty (30) calendar days following the date of filing of the complaint.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.