Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On March 26, 2002, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech”) and McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. (“XxXxxx”) (Xxxxxxxxx and XxXxxx are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the negotiated portions of an interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) dated March 26, 2002, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The remaining portions of the Agreement were determined through an arbitration petition in Docket No. 01-0623. Ameritech and XxXxxx submit those portions of the Agreement to the Commission for review pursuant to the Order entered in Docket No. 01-0623. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying the joint petition is a statement in support of the joint petition from Xxxx Xxxxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiations. Pursuant to due notice, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on April 10, 2002. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of Ameritech and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On March 26May 16, 20022008, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AmeritechAT&T Illinois”) and McLeodUSA Telecommunications ServicesVertex Broadband, Inc. Corp. d/b/a AthenaTel d/b/a Reason to Switch d/b/a TownLink Communications d/b/a INT Connections (“XxXxxxVertex”) (Xxxxxxxxx and XxXxxx are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) ), filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s for approval of the negotiated portions of an interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) 1st Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated March 26May 6, 2002, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) 2008 under Section 252 of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 252 et seq.) (“TA96the Act”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The remaining portions of the Agreement were determined through an arbitration petition in Docket No. 01-0623. Ameritech and XxXxxx submit those portions of the Agreement 1st Amendment to the Commission for review pursuant to the Order entered in Docket No. 01-0623. A copy of the Agreement was filed submitted with the joint petition. Also accompanying the joint petition is a A statement in support of the joint petition from Xxxx Xxxxxxwas filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Xx. on behalf of AT&T Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiationsand by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx on behalf of Vertex, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to due noticenotice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before a by the duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in SpringfieldChicago, Illinois Illinois, on April 10June 9, 20022008. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of Ameritech and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The previously filed the Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications DivisionDivision on June 6, 2008. At the hearing on June 9, 2008, AT&T Illinois, Vertex and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Subsequently Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On March 26May 6, 20022004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AmeritechSBC Illinois”) and McLeodUSA Telecommunications ServicesSage Telecom, Inc. (“XxXxxxSage”) ), (Xxxxxxxxx and XxXxxx are referred to collectively as “Joint Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s for approval of the negotiated portions of an interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) First Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated March 26April 30, 20022004, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) under Section 252 of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The remaining portions of Agreement was submitted with the Agreement were determined through an arbitration petition in Docket No. 01-0623. Ameritech and XxXxxx submit those portions of the Agreement to the Commission for review pursuant to the Order entered in Docket No. 01-0623petition. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying the joint petition is a statement in support of the joint petition from was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxxxon behalf of SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxx X. XxXxxxxxxx on behalf of Xxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiationsstating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to due noticenotice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, a Status session was held in this matter on June 7, 2004. SBC Illinois, Sage, and Commission Staff appeared by counsel. Petitions for Leave to Intervene filed by AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc. (“AT&T”) and MCI, Inc. (“MCI”) were granted. Staff stated that it had not yet filed a Verified Statement in this docket. On June 14, Staff filed the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. The Parties filed replies (AT&T and XXX filed a joint reply to Staff’s Verified Statement and joint Exceptions to the Proposed Order; they are identified herein as AT&T/MCI). This matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in SpringfieldChicago, Illinois Illinois, on April 10June 25, 20022004. Appearances were entered by counsel SBC Illinois, Sage, AT&T, MCI, and Staff appeared. Xx. Xxxxxxxxx testified on behalf of Ameritech and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing which was admitted into evidence, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On March 26June 13, 20022005, Illinois Bell El Paso Telephone Company (“AmeritechEl Paso”) and McLeodUSA Telecommunications ServicesUnited States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, Inc. LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#4, LLC, and USCOC of Rockford, LLC (collectively “XxXxxxUS Cellular”) (Xxxxxxxxx El Paso and XxXxxx US Cellular are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the a negotiated portions of an interconnection traffic termination agreement (“Agreement”) dated March 26entered into on or about May 13, 20022005, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The remaining portions of the Agreement were determined through an arbitration petition in Docket No. 01-0623. Ameritech and XxXxxx submit those portions of the Agreement to the Commission for review pursuant to the Order entered in Docket No. 01-0623. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying petition and supported by the joint petition is a statement in support of Xxxx XxXxxxx, Assistant General Counsel for FairPoint Communications, Inc., the joint petition from Xxxx Xxxxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiationsparent company of El Paso. Pursuant to due notice, a hearing was held in this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on April 10July 6, 20022005. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of Ameritech El Paso, US Cellular, and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Telecommunication’s Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received. Nor are there any contested issues in this proceeding.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On March 26June 13, 20022005, Illinois Bell XxXxxx Telephone Company (“AmeritechMcNabb”) and McLeodUSA Telecommunications ServicesUnited States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, Inc. LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#4, LLC, and USCOC of Rockford, LLC (collectively “XxXxxxUS Cellular”) (Xxxxxxxxx McNabb and XxXxxx US Cellular are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the a negotiated portions of an interconnection traffic termination agreement (“Agreement”) dated March 26entered into on or about May 13, 20022005, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The remaining portions of the Agreement were determined through an arbitration petition in Docket No. 01-0623. Ameritech and XxXxxx submit those portions of the Agreement to the Commission for review pursuant to the Order entered in Docket No. 01-0623. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying petition and supported by the joint petition is a statement in support of the joint petition from Xxxx XxxxxxXxxxxx Xxxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company NegotiationsGeneral Manager of XxXxxx. Pursuant to due notice, a hearing was held in this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on April 10July 6, 20022005. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of Ameritech McNabb, US Cellular, and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Telecommunication’s Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received. Nor are there any contested issues in this proceeding.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On March 26June 13, 20022005, Illinois Bell Xxxxx City Telephone Company (“AmeritechXxxxx”) and McLeodUSA Telecommunications ServicesUnited States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, Inc. LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#4, LLC, and USCOC of Rockford, LLC (collectively “XxXxxxUS Cellular”) (Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx and XxXxxx US Cellular are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the a negotiated portions of an interconnection traffic termination agreement (“Agreement”) dated March 26entered into on or about May 13, 20022005, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The remaining portions of the Agreement were determined through an arbitration petition in Docket No. 01-0623. Ameritech and XxXxxx submit those portions of the Agreement to the Commission for review pursuant to the Order entered in Docket No. 01-0623. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying petition and supported by the joint petition is a statement in support of Xxxx XxXxxxx, Assistant General Counsel for FairPoint Communications, Inc., the joint petition from Xxxx Xxxxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiationsparent company of Xxxxx. Pursuant to due notice, a hearing was held in this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on April 10July 6, 20022005. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of Ameritech Xxxxx, US Cellular, and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Telecommunication’s Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received. Nor are there any contested issues in this proceeding.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On March 26June 13, 20022005, Illinois Bell Odin Telephone Company (“Ameritech”) and McLeodUSA Telecommunications ServicesExchange, Inc. (“XxXxxxOdin”) and United States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA#4, LLC, and USCOC of Rockford, LLC (collectively “US Cellular”) (Xxxxxxxxx Odin and XxXxxx US Cellular are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the a negotiated portions of an interconnection traffic termination agreement (“Agreement”) dated March 26entered into on or about May 13, 20022005, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The remaining portions of the Agreement were determined through an arbitration petition in Docket No. 01-0623. Ameritech and XxXxxx submit those portions of the Agreement to the Commission for review pursuant to the Order entered in Docket No. 01-0623. A copy of the Agreement was filed with the joint petition. Also accompanying petition and supported by the joint petition is a statement in support of Xxxx XxXxxxx, Assistant General Counsel for FairPoint Communications, Inc., the joint petition from Xxxx Xxxxxx, Director-Negotiations for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company Negotiationsparent company of Odin. Pursuant to due notice, a hearing was held in this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on April 10July 6, 20022005. Appearances were entered by counsel on behalf of Ameritech Xxxx, US Cellular, and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Telecommunication’s Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, Xx. Xxxxxxx recommends approval of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received. Nor are there any contested issues in this proceeding.