Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 8, 2009, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall Communications, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA (“Everycall”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated December 31, 2008, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of Everycall, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on February 10, 2008. Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on February 10, Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 8February 25, 20092004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellSBC Illinois”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall CommunicationsOnePoint Communications Illinois, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA LLC (“EverycallOnePoint”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Fourth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated December 31February 20, 20082004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionPetition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Xxxx SBC Illinois and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of EverycallOnePoint, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on February 10April 19, 20082004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on February 10April 19, Illinois Bell SBC Illinois, OnePoint, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 827, 20092003, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (SBC Illinois) (“Illinois BellSBC”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall CommunicationsOneida Network Services, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA (“EverycallOneida”), filed a joint petition Petition for approval of the Interconnection a negotiated Traffic Termination Agreement dated December 31January 2, 20082003 (the “Agreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionPetition. A statement in support of the petition Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Xxxx SBC Illinois and by Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of EverycallXxxxxx, stating that the facts contained in the petition Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on February 10March 11, 20082003. Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxx Xxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on February 10March 11th, Illinois Bell SBC, Oneida, and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Xxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 8August 24, 20092004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellSBC Illinois”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall CommunicationsVarTec Telecom, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA (“EverycallVarTec”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Sixth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated December 31August 18, 20082004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxxxxx on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Xxxx SBC Illinois and by Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of EverycallVarTec, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on February 10October 4, 20082004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on February 10October 4, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 8February 13, 20092013, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Illinois d/b/a AT&T Wholesale (“Illinois Bell”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall Communications365 Wireless, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA LLC (“Everycall365”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Wireless Interconnection Agreement dated December January 31, 20082013, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx on behalf of Everycall365, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on February 10March 13, 20082013. Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on February 10March 13, Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 823, 20092001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellAmeritech Illinois”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall CommunicationsLooking Glass Networks, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA (“EverycallLooking Glass”), filed a joint petition request for approval of the Negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated December 31November 1, 20082000 (the “Agreement”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 151, et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petitionrequest. A statement in support of the petition request was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx Xxxxx, on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and Xxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of EverycallLooking Glass, stating that the facts contained in the petition request for approval are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and beliefcorrect. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge Hearing Examiner of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on February 1028, 20082001. Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. Xx. Xxxxxxx recommended the approval of the Agreement. At the hearing on February 10hearing, Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence , and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 8August 26, 20092004, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois BellSBC Illinois”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall CommunicationsGlobal Crossing Local Services, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA (“EverycallGlobal”), ) filed a joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated December 31August 23, 20082004, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Xxxx SBC Illinois and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, XXX on behalf of EverycallGlobal, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on February 10October 4, 20082004. Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on February 10October 4, SBC Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Mr. Xxxxxxx’s Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 8June 29, 20092011, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) and Illinois Bell Big River Telephone Company and Everycall CommunicationsCompany, Inc. d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA LLC. (“EverycallBig River”), filed a joint petition for approval of the Interconnection Agreement dated December 31June 28, 20082011, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. XxxxXxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xx. on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Xxxx and by Xxxxxx X. Xxxx Xxxxx on behalf of Everycall, Big River stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on February 10September 12, 20082011. Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. A. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on February 10September 12, Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On January 8October 20, 20092005, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company and Everycall Communications, Inc. Megacomm Corporation d/b/a All American Home d/b/a Local USA MegaPage (“EverycallMegacomm”), filed a joint petition for approval of the a Paging Interconnection Agreement dated December 31September 27, 20082005, under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the petition. A statement in support of the petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxxx X. Xxxx, Xx. Xxxx on behalf of Xxxxxxxx Illinois Xxxx and by Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx on behalf of EverycallMegacomm, stating that the facts contained in the petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on February 10November 17, 20082005. Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. At the hearing on February 10November 17, Illinois Bell and Staff appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. Xx. Xxxxxxx’x Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”