Prior Authorization Review – Initial Adverse Determination Sample Clauses

Prior Authorization Review – Initial Adverse Determination. If we do not approve the Prior Authorization request (Adverse Determination) we will notify you and your Practitioner/Provider by telephone (or as required by your medical situation) within 24 hours of making our decision. We will also notify you and your Practitioner/Provider of the Adverse Determination by written or electronic communication sent within one (1) working day of a telephone notice. Our notice will include: • Reasons for a Medical Necessity denial including why the requested health care service is not Medically Necessary. • The reason for a denial based on lack of coverage and a reference to all health care plan provisions on which the denial is based and a clear and complete explanation of why the Health Care Service is not Covered. • An explanation of how you may request our internal review of our Adverse Determination including any forms that must be used and completed. Please see the Complaints, Grievances and Appeals Section for information regarding how to request an internal review of any Adverse Determinations that we make.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Prior Authorization Review – Initial Adverse Determination. If we do not approve the Prior Authorization request (Adverse Determination) we will notify you and your Practitioner/Provider by telephone (or as required by your medical situation) within 24 hours of making our decision. We will also notify you and your Practitioner/Provider of the Adverse Determination by written or electronic communication sent within one (1) working day of a telephone notice. Our notice will include: • Reasons for a Medical Necessity denial including why the requested healthcare service is not Medically Necessary. • The reason for a denial based on lack of coverage and a reference to all healthcare plan provisions on which the denial is based and a clear and complete explanation of why the Health Care Service is not Covered. • An explanation of how you may request our internal review of our Adverse Determination including any forms that must be used and completed. Please see the Complaints, Grievances and Appeals Section for information regarding how to request an internal review of any Adverse Determinations that we make. Benefits‌‌ This Health Care Benefit Plan offers Coverage for a wide range of Health Care Services. This Section gives you the details about your benefits, Prior Authorization and other requirements, Limitations and Exclusions. Specifically Covered This Health Care Benefit Plan helps pay for healthcare expenses that are Medically Necessary and Specifically Covered in this Agreement. Specifically Covered means only those Health Care Benefits that are expressly listed and described in the Benefits Section of the Agreement. In addition, you should refer to the Exclusions Section that lists services that are not Covered under your Health Care Benefit Plan. All other benefits and services not specifically listed as Covered in the Benefits Section shall be excluded, except for Clinical Preventive Health Services and except as required by state or federal law. There are no annual or lifetime limits on the dollar value of essential health benefits, as defined under the Affordable Care Act. Presbyterian Insurance Company will not deny or limit coverage, deny or limit coverage of a claim, or impose additional cost-sharing or other limitation or restrictions on coverage, for any health services that are ordinarily or exclusively available to individuals of one sex, to a transgender individual based on the fact that an individual’s sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender otherwise recorded is different from the one to ...

Related to Prior Authorization Review – Initial Adverse Determination

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Readiness Review Includes all plans to be implemented in one or more Service Areas on the anticipated Operational Start Date. At a minimum, the HMO shall, for each HMO Program:

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.