Price Analysis Sample Clauses

Price Analysis. Delete the fourth sentence and Substitute “Price Analysis forms are available from the Authority’s Project Engineer.” Delete the (8th) last paragraph that begins with “Due to the cost and effort associated with development…”, in its entirety.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Price Analysis. In May 2022, DGS issued a request for quotes from cooperative purchasing organizations that offer OneLogin. DGS received 1 quote from NASPO/SHI for $100,886.60/Year for a one-year term for the software subscription with OnePrime 247 Support included. The quote submitted was based on the scope of work SPS provided. In 2019, DoIT awarded a OneLogin contract to SHI for a total of $190,000. The contract was $90,000/Year for a two-year term for the software subscription and $10,000 for one-time Professional Services. This was the #1 ranked quote of the 2 quotes that were received. The #2 quote was from DUO/SHI and was for a total of $2,480,000. The quote was for $1,230,000/Year for a two-year term for the software subscription and $20,000 for one-time Professional Services. In 2021, DGS awarded a OneLogin contract to SHI for $98,958.33. This was the #1 ranked quote of 3 quotes. The #2 quote was from Sourcewell/SHI and was for a total of $100,000. The quote was $90,000/Year for a one-year term for the software subscription and $10,000 for One-Prime Support. The #3 quote was from Omnia Support/SHI and was for a total of $99,476.44. The quote was $89,528.80/Year for a one-year term for the software subscription and $9,947.64 for One-Prime Support. DGS reviewed the quote and determined that the XXXXX XXX quote meets the scope and, based on the historical pricing as stated above, the price quoted by SHI has been determined to be fair and reasonable. Determination By: 8/12/22 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx-Xxxx, Procurement Officer Date Reviewed By: Xxxx Xxxxxx 8/12/22 Xxxx Xxxxxx, DBM Deputy Secretary Date DGS Office of State Procurement Approval: Primary procurement unit head approval of above facts and determination M. . Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Chief Procurement Officer Date: Signature: Email: Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx (Aug 12, 2022 10:56 EDT) xxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx Signature: Email: xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx
Price Analysis. In all instances other than those described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the recipient must perform a price analysis to determine the reasonableness of the proposed contract price.
Price Analysis. For purposes of evaluation of prices, reasonableness of cost will be based on the trade-off process in selecting the offer that is most advantageous. The trade-off process is a method of evaluating price and other factors as specified in the solicitation to select the offer that provides the best value to the Government. This process permits trade-offs between price and technical factors. It allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced offer or the highest technically scored offer. The CO will examine the price proposals as prescribed in Sections 15.403 and 15.404 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation to determine feasibility of the overall price, and to ensure a fair and reasonable price. M.3. FAR 52.217-5 - EVALUATION OF OPTIONS (JUL 1990). Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government’s best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the options(s).
Price Analysis. The Government will perform a price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b) procedures.
Price Analysis. The process of evalu- ating a prospective price without re- gard to the contractor’s separate cost elements and proposed profit. Price analysis determines the reasonableness of the proposed contract price based on adequate price competition, previous experience with similar work, estab- lished catalog or market price, law, or regulation.
Price Analysis. The propose pricing will be evaluated using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404 in order to determine if they are complete and reasonable. The Government will determine completeness of the Offeror’s proposal by verifying that all solicitation requirements have been priced, figures are correctly calculated, and offerors use the Task Order Pricing Template and MES-C Pricing Template.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Price Analysis. In accordance with CNICINST 7043.1 CH1, the proposed prices will be examined and evaluated without evaluating its separate cost elements and proposed profit. Techniques include, but are not limited to the following: Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation. Comparison of previously proposed prices and contract prices with current proposed prices for the same or similar services, if both the validity of the comparison and the reasonableness of the previous price(s) can be established. Comparison of proposed prices with Independent Government Cost Estimate.
Price Analysis. The Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing Agreement and FIDM Alliance Agreement provides the State of Maryland with a favorable pre-determined pricing structure promoting administrative efficiencies to meet the above-mentioned mission critical initiatives of the Child Support Administration. With the Department continuing within the Alliance, all FIDM Alliance participants pay the same rate thereby allowing each state to benefit from the volume of all states. Category: Supply _X Service Maintenance Construction IT Contract Type: _X Firm Fixed Price Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Cost Reimb. Fixed Price Incentive Cost plus Incentive Fee Other Was this action a modification /option to an existing contract? X_ Yes No If yes, provide aggregate amount of contract including all modifications/options: $1,480,349 I have made this Determination: Procurement Officer: Date: May 2, 2023 Xxxxx Xxxxxx-Xxxx, Procurement Officer, Department of Human Services Approval by the Office of the Secretary: Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Secretary Date: May 2, 2023 DGS OSP ICPA POD Memo Retro 2023 Final Audit Report 2023-05-05 "DGS OSP ICPA POD Memo Retro 2023" History Document created by XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX (XXXXX.XXXXXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXX.XXX) 2023-05-05 - 12:50:12 PM GMT- IP address: 174.196.132.194 Document emailed to Xxxxxx Xxxx (xxxxxx.xxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx) for signature 2023-05-05 - 12:52:13 PM GMT Email viewed by Xxxxxx Xxxx (xxxxxx.xxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx) 2023-05-05 - 2:04:20 PM GMT- IP address: 66.249.83.200 Document e-signed by Xxxxxx Xxxx (xxxxxx.xxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx) Signature Date: 2023-05-05 - 2:04:27 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 167.102.225.96 Document emailed to Xxxx Xxxxxxx (xxxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx) for signature 2023-05-05 - 2:04:29 PM GMT Email viewed by Xxxx Xxxxxxx (xxxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx) 2023-05-05 - 2:06:56 PM GMT- IP address: 66.249.83.198 Document e-signed by Xxxx Xxxxxxx (xxxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx) Signature Date: 2023-05-05 - 2:17:46 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 71.207.118.251 Document emailed to Xxxx Xxxxxxxx (xxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx) for signature 2023-05-05 - 2:17:47 PM GMT Email viewed by Xxxx Xxxxxxxx (xxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx) 2023-05-05 - 2:18:19 PM GMT- IP address: 66.102.8.157 Document e-signed by Xxxx Xxxxxxxx (xxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx) Signature Date: 2023-05-05 - 2:19:40 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 167.102.225.96 Agreement completed. 2023-05-05 - 2:19:40 PM GMT Created: 2023-05-05 By: Status: Transaction ID: XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX (XXX...

Related to Price Analysis

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • SAMPLE (i) Unless agreed otherwise, wheeled or track lay- ing equipment shall not be operated in areas identified as needing special measures except on roads, landings, tractor roads, or skid trails approved under B5.1 or B6.422. Purchaser may be required to backblade skid trails and other ground disturbed by Purchaser’s Opera- tions within such areas in lieu of cross ditching required under B6.6. Additional special protection measures needed to protect such known areas are identified in C6.24.

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • Analysis LICENSEE represents and agrees that it will only incorporate Components received from authorized suppliers into Licensed Products and for no other purpose, and that LICENSEE will not directly or indirectly attempt to reverse-engineer any material provided to it hereunder by LICENSEE or any supplier of any Component.

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange The Parties will cooperate with one another and the NYISO in the analysis of disturbances to either the Large Generating Facility or the New York State Transmission System by gathering and providing access to any information relating to any disturbance, including information from disturbance recording equipment, protective relay targets, breaker operations and sequence of events records, and any disturbance information required by Good Utility Practice.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.