Preliminary Ratings Sample Clauses

Preliminary Ratings. The Preliminary Rating is either Meets Target or Pending Further Analysis. The Meets rating means that the information contained in the financials under review indicates that the school is meeting or exceeding the target for the standard in question. The Pending rating means that the school is not meeting the target based on the financials under review. A school that misses the target on any one measure may or may not be at financial risk. It may be in immediate distress, financially trending negatively, both or neither. There are two types of additional information that the Commission may need before assigning a Final Rating. The first is more current information. When conducting a year-end evaluation of a school’s financials, the Commission will be reviewing audit numbers that are typically at least four months old by the time the audit has been finalized. The Commission’s further analysis will often include review of current, unaudited, financials. The second is more detailed information about the school’s financial position to assess the reasons behind the failure to meet the target. For example, a school might make a strategic long-term financial decision that results in it missing a target in the near term. The Commission’s follow-up will consider the more current and more detailed information to determine whether the Preliminary Rating is still applicable and the degree to which it is, in fact, an indication of financial risk or distress. Final Ratings The Final Rating is Meets Target, Does Not Meet Target, or Falls Far Below Target. Meets Target A Meets rating indicates sound financial viability based on the overall financial record. Either the school has already met the target based on the financials under review, or previous financial concerns that produced a preliminary Pending rating have been adequately remedied based on more current financial data or addressed adequately based on additional information such that the Commission concludes that performance against the target indicates sound financial viability.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (64)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Preliminary Ratings

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it:

  • PRIORITY RATING If so identified, this Contract is a "rated order" certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and SELLER shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocation System Regulation (15 C.F.R. Part 700).

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Rating The Notes can be issued without the requirement that they have any rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • Insurance Company Rating The required insurance must be written by a company approved to do business in the State or Texas with a financial standing of at least an A- rating, as reflected in Best’s insurance ratings or by a similar rating system recognized within the insurance industry at the time the policy is issued.

  • Insurance Carrier Rating Coverages provided by Contractor must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable to the State of Washington’s Office of Risk Management. Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies authorized to do business within the State of Washington and rated A- Class VII or better in the most recently published edition of Best’s Insurance Rating. Enterprise Services reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s) with an unacceptable financial rating.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.