Potential Funding Sample Clauses

Potential Funding. ‌ Implementing restoration activities identified in this plan will be a challenge given Mason County’s economic situation. Similar to other local governments in Washington State, the County has been working hard to provide basic services with tighter budgets. A funding mechanism to support these voluntary actions has not yet been identified and funds are not currently dedicated. At present, shoreline restoration is almost entirely dependent on grant funding, which depends upon the availability and award of state and federal monies. The County’s ability to devote any general funds to the implementation of this plan is doubtful, but potential internal funding sources do exist. One potential funding mechanism would be the establishment of a shoreline restoration program organized like or integrated with a capital improvement program (CIP). Similar to an infrastructure CIP, a shoreline restoration CIP would be evaluated and updated regularly. A restoration CIP could be focused on site-specific projects and could be funded through grants or County general funds. For example, funds could be dedicated to support bulkhead removal, beach cleanup, and riparian enhancements in the shoreline jurisdiction. Further, existing CIP projects, such as stormwater facility and road improvements, could be evaluated to determine if their design could advance shoreline restoration goals. Special Districts or local improvement districts (LIDs) could also be established to help fund and/or implement restoration projects. A Special District is a local unit of government authorized by law to perform a single function or a limited number of functions, and including but not limited to, water-sewer districts, irrigation districts, and transportation districts. LIDs are primarily a means of financing needed capital improvements. LIDs allow improvements to be financed and paid for over a period of time through assessments on the benefitting properties. They require the approval of the local government and benefited property owners. LIDs involve the sale of bonds to investors and the retirement of those bonds via annual payments by the property owners within a district. Both of the models would provide a potential mechanism for achieving some of the goals of this plan. A variety of outside funding sources are also available for restoration projects in Puget Sound; these are listed in Appendix C: Potential Funding Sources. Funding opportunities have generally increased since the implementat...
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Potential Funding. The XXXX proposal included in this thesis will be submitted in response to the funding opportunity announcement-Pragmatic Research in Healthcare Settings to Improve Diabetes and Obesity Prevention and Care (R18) (xxxx://xxxxxx.xxx.xxx/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-15- 157.html). The purpose of this Research Demonstration and Dissemination Projects (R18) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is to encourage research applications to test approaches to improve diabetes and obesity prevention and/or treatment in routine healthcare settings designed to test practical and potentially sustainable strategies to improve processes of care and health outcomes for individuals who are overweight or obese or at risk for becoming overweight or obese and/or at risk for or have type 1 or type 2 diabetes. This FOA seeks research to test the effectiveness of implementable and potentially scalable and sustainable strategies for healthcare delivery to prevent type 2 diabetes in at-risk individuals, improve care for individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and reduce associated long term complications, or to test the effectiveness of obesity prevention and treatment strategies that can be implemented in primary care settings.
Sample 1
Potential Funding. In the case of the Text4Teen grant proposal contained in the appendix of this thesis, it is anticipated that this grant would be submitted to Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Within HHS, there are a number of areas where funding may be able to be obtained, including most prominently Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) programs, Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) state system development programs, and special programs funding as authorized by congress. Additionally, anticipated funding award amounts can vary significantly and range from $100, 000 to $300,000 or higher. Also, it should be noted that funding from multiple sources can sometimes be used in augment certain elements across program areas. Under the Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of Extramural Resources prepares materials and guidelines to assist both the construction and evaluation of grant proposals. The Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight (DGCO) in the Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration (OPERA), Office of Extramural Research (OER), National Institute of Health (NIH), acts as a focal point to advance objective grant evaluation, external compliance with policy and legislative mandates, and enhance compliance oversight by recipient institutions (HHS, 2011f). Accordingly, the discussion of grant applications, evaluations, and scoring resources was constructed around guidance and materials available from these organizations. Funding for public health- related grant program sponsored by HHS is done on a competitive basis. In support of its mission, HHS awards grants for more than 300 programs and is the largest grant-awarding agency in the Federal government. HHS awards two types of grants: non-discretionary and discretionary (HHS, 2011g). Non-discretionary grants are those that a federal agency is required by statute to award if the recipient, usually a state, submits an acceptable State Plan or application and meets the eligibility and compliance requirements of the statutory and regulatory provisions of the grant program (HHS, 2011g). Discretionary Grants permit the federal government, according to specific authorizing legislation, to exercise judgment, or "discretion," in selecting the applicant/recipient organization, through a competitive grant process (HHS, 2011g). Information forecasting grant funded is programs is provided by HHS and is available through Internet access. Additionally, applications for grant f...
Sample 1
Potential Funding. 4.1 Currently Council capital works program has no identified projects or associated budget allocated.
Sample 1
Potential Funding. A variety of outside funding sources are available for restoration projects in Puget Sound. Funding opportunities have generally increased since the implementation of Governor Gregoire’s Puget Sound Initiative in 2005, though the process by which organizations are able to obtain funds is typically quite competitive. Sources listed here do not represent an exhaustive list of potential funding opportunities, but are meant to provide an overview of the types of opportunities available. For additional detail, see the Xxxxx County Restoration Plan, Chapter 9.
Sample 1

Related to Potential Funding

  • Fiscal Funding Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, the parties hereto agree that the charges hereunder are payable to the Contractor by the District solely from appropriations received by District. In the event such appropriations are determined by the Chief Financial Officer/Comptroller of the District to no longer exist or to be insufficient with respect to the charges payable hereunder, this Agreement shall immediately terminate without further obligation to the District upon notice that such appropriations no longer exist and are insufficient. If this Agreement is so terminated, then the District shall only pay Contractor for goods and/or services provided by Contractor and accepted by the District up to, through, and including the date of termination. Following the termination of this Agreement under this Section, the parties’ duties to one another shall cease except for those obligations that shall survive the termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the District’s payment obligations for goods and/or services accepted by the District before the date of termination, and the Contractor’s duties to insure and/or indemnify the District and to cooperate with any audit. Termination of this Agreement pursuant to this Section shall not limit either of the parties’ remedies for any breach of this Agreement.

  • Additional Funding If the General Partner determines that it is in the best interests of the Partnership to provide for additional Partnership funds (“Additional Funds”) for any Partnership purpose, the General Partner may (i) cause the Partnership to obtain such funds from outside borrowings, or (ii) elect to have the General Partner or any of its Affiliates provide such Additional Funds to the Partnership through loans or otherwise.

  • Program Funding Upon entry into force of this Compact, MCC will grant to the Government, under the terms of this Compact, an amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eight Million Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand United States Dollars (US$408,850,000) to support the Program (“Program Funding”). The allocation of Program Funding is generally described in Annex II to this Compact.

  • Formula Funding Funding equivalent to the level of funding which would be provided through the funding formula of the LA to a maintained school which had all of that Academy's relevant characteristics, including its number of pupils;

  • Per-pupil Funding The School's non-facility general fund per-pupil funding shall be as defined in Sec. 302D-28, HRS. The Commission shall distribute the School's per-pupil allocation each fiscal year pursuant to Sec. 302D-28(f), HRS, and shall provide the School with the calculations used to determine the per-pupil amount each year. All funds distributed to the School from the Commission shall be used solely for the School's educational purposes as appropriated by the Legislature, and the School shall have discretion to determine how such funding shall be allocated at the school level to serve those purposes subject to applicable laws and this Contract.

  • Loss of Funding Performance by University under this Agreement may be dependent upon the appropriation and allotment of funds by the Texas State Legislature (Legislature) and/or allocation of funds by the Board of Regents of The University of Texas System (Board). If Legislature fails to appropriate or allot necessary funds, or Board fails to allocate necessary funds, then University will issue written notice to Contractor and University may terminate this Agreement without further duty or obligation. Contractor acknowledges that appropriation, allotment, and allocation of funds are beyond University’s control.

  • Funding This Contract is subject to termination or cancellation, without penalty to System Agency, either in whole or in part, subject to the availability of state funds. System Agency is a state agency whose authority and appropriations are subject to actions of the Texas Legislature. If System Agency becomes subject to a legislative change, revocation of statutory authority, or lack of appropriated funds that would render either System Agency’s or Grantee’s delivery or performance under the Contract impossible or unnecessary, the Contract will be terminated or cancelled and be deemed null and void. In the event of a termination or cancellation under this Section, System Agency will not be liable to Grantee for any damages, that are caused or associated with such termination, or cancellation, and System Agency will not be required to give prior notice.

  • Supplemental Funding Unless otherwise defined by program rules, Supplemental Funding is the award of additional funds to provide for an increase in costs due to unforeseen circumstances. The State will comply with all Federal program agency policies and procedures for requesting supplemental grant funding. The State will comply with the following guidelines when requesting supplemental funding for the Medical Assistance Program and associated administrative payments (CFDA 93.778): The State must submit a revised Medicaid Program Budget Report (CMS-37) to request supplemental funding. The CMS guidelines and instructions for completing the CMS-37 are provided in Section 2600F of the State Medicaid Manual (SMM). The CMS/CO must receive the revised Form CMS-37 through the Medicaid Budget Expenditure System/Children's Budget Expenditure System (MBES/CBES) no later than 10 calendar days before the end of the quarter for which the supplemental grant award is being requested. Additional guidance on this policy is available from the respective CMS Regional Office, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The State will comply with the following guidelines when requesting supplemental funding for TANF (CFDA 93.558), CCDF (CFDA 93.575), CSE (93.563), and the FC/AA (CFDA 93.658 and CFDA 93.659) programs administered by the U.S. Department of Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (HHS/ACF):

  • Lack of Funding The Parties recognize that the compensation provided for in this Grant Contract depends on budget approval and appropriations of sufficient grant funds by the Lancaster County Board of County Commissioners (“Grant Funds”). The Parties further recognize that the Sponsor may terminate this Grant Contract in whole or in part immediately upon written notice to Grantee if grant funds do not receive sufficient budget approval or appropriations. The date Project Monitor sends the written notice of termination shall be the date of termination. The Grantee understands and agrees that the Sponsor shall not provide for funding under this Grant Contract from the Lancaster County General Fund, tax revenue, or any other source, and that the sole source of funding for this Grant Contract shall be approved and appropriated Grant Funds. In the event that Grant Funds do not receive sufficient budget approval or appropriations, the Grantee shall be compensated pursuant to the terms of this Grant Contract for authorized Project Account costs charged against the Project Account prior to the date of termination according to the approved Project Budget. Xxxxxxx agrees that Xxxxxxx has no reasonable expectation of payment for unauthorized costs, or for payment of any kind from any other source. The Grantee further understands and agrees that any costs not covered by the current Grant Contract are not authorized.

  • Contingency of Funding 6.26.1 A-E acknowledges that funding or portions of funding for this CONTRACT may also be contingent upon receipt of funds from, and/or appropriation of funds by, the State of California or other funding sources to COUNTY. If such funding and/or appropriations are not forthcoming, or otherwise limited, COUNTY may immediately terminate or modify this CONTRACT without penalty.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.