Population and Housing. Would the project:
Population and Housing. The Project is expected to have less than significant to no impacts on Population and Housing. Public Services The Project is expected to have less than significant impacts on Public Services.
Population and Housing. Guide for use Data source type: Census Supplementary denominator data source Data Element / Data Set Data Element Person—labour force status Data Source ABS 2011 Census of Population and Housing Guide for use Data source type: Census Supplementary denominator data source Disaggregation: National and state/territory by Indigenous status, by remoteness area. Disaggregation data elements: Data Element / Data Set Data Element Person—Indigenous status Data Source ABS 2011 Census of Population and Housing Guide for use Data source type: Census Data Element Person—area of usual residence, statistical area level 1 (SA1) (ASGS 2011) Data Source ABS 2011 Census of Population and Housing Guide for use Data source type: Census Data Element / Data Set Comments: The most recent data for 2014 reporting was the 2011 Census. Data sources for this measure are: Census. The baseline report reported data from the 2006 Census as the supplementary data collection. Baseline year for NIRA target (Halve the gap in employment outcomes within a decade) is 2008; baseline year for this measure is 2006. Two Census data specifications are provided. The second specification is designed to allow for comparisons to be made with survey data. The survey data, unlike the census data, excludes people living in non-private dwellings, members of the permanent defence forces and members of foreign representation. Data disaggregated by remoteness area were available for reporting during the 2014 reporting cycle. Representational attributes Representation class: Percentage Data type: Real Unit of measure: Person Format: N[N].N Indicator conceptual framework Framework and dimensions: Socioeconomic Factors Data source attributes Data sources: Data Source ABS 2011 Census of Population and Housing Frequency Every 5 years. Data custodian Australian Bureau of Statistics. Accountability attributes Organisation responsible for providing data: Further data development / collection required: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Specification: Long-term. Annual data is not currently available for Indigenous persons. Source and reference attributes Xxxxxxx: National Indigenous Reform Agreement Performance Information Management Group Relational attributes Related metadata references: Supersedes National Indigenous Reform Agreement: PI 14a-Level of workforce participation (Census data), 2014 Indigenous, Superseded 24/11/2014 Has been superseded by National Indigenous Reform Agreement: PI 14a—Level of workforce...
Population and Housing. As discussed above, one of the key terms of the 2017 settlement agreement between the City of Menlo Park and the City of East Palo Alto is that an HNA will be prepared when the preparation of an EIR is required. Therefore, population and housing topics will be discussed in the EIR, rather than in the Initial Study (see Task 6, below). Public Services and Utilities – As stated above, the Project would intensify uses at the site compared to existing conditions and would introduce new onsite employees as well as additional demand for services and utilities. ICF will estimate the Project-generated demand for public services and utilities based on existing operational standards. Although new utility connections would be required for the intensification of the uses at the Project site, these connections are not anticipated to result in significant impacts. Compared to the analysis in the certified ConnectMenlo EIR, the Project is not expected to trigger the need for new or expanded public service facilities or utilities. This scope of work anticipates that the land use assumptions in the Water Supply Evaluation (WSE) Study prepared for ConnectMenlo were conservative. In addition, the Initial Study will discuss and evaluate the existing water flow issue for fire pressure in the area.
Population and Housing. As previously discussed for Agriculture and Forestry Resources, if distributed proportionally to all CVP water users, about two-thirds of the average annual 130 TAF of SWP supplies (or 86 TAF of water) is expected to be made available to existing agricultural lands within the CVP service area (Reclamation 2019a). The remainder (or about 43 TAF) would be provided for M&I land uses. Based on an average of 100 gallons per day per capita for residential water use, 43 TAF of water would meet the needs of 51,300 people or about 17,950 residences with an average household of 2.86 people. This volume of water equals about 3.7 percent of the average annual M&I CVP water deliveries. This volume of water also equals about 2.5 percent of the maximum CVP M&I historical use. Therefore, the increased CVP M&I water supply that would be provided by the 2018 COA Addendum would contribute to meeting M&I water demand to CVP water users that have been subject to reduced water deliveries resulting from dryer hydrologic conditions and regulatory restrictions. The additional water would not result in exceeding the maximum historical CVP M&I water use of 167 TAF. The reduced water supplies available to SWP water contractors would need to be replaced by development of alternative water supplies, water conservation, or transfer of water supplies from other sources. Because the SWP provides water to about 27,000,000 people, the entire volume of water (130 TAF) re-allocated to the CVP would meet about 0.2 percent of the SWP M&I water demand. The reduced SWP volume of water would be negligible compared to the annual SWP M&I deliveries. Individual water contractors or retail water purveyors are expected to manage their respective systems accordingly, to compensate for the reduced water deliveries. Therefore, implementation of the 2018 COA Addendum would have no substantial effect on population and housing. CONCLUSION As concluded in the 2018 XXX, implementation of the 2018 COA Addendum would shift responsibilities for meeting obligations between the CVP and SWP. As demonstrated in this discussion, changes to surface water flow upstream from the Delta would be minimal. The shift in responsibilities would result in reduced SWP exports to south of Delta water users and an increase in export to CVP water users. These changes would be minor when compared to the total volume of water delivered by either the CVP or SWP. The minimal change to surface water hydrology and water deliveries woul...
Population and Housing. No Mitigation Required
Population and Housing. The Tunnel Alternative would not require full or partial acquisition of any residential properties in the south section. Access to residential properties and traffic patterns in the south section of the Tunnel Alternative would generally be very similar to current conditions. The new SODO Ramps to SR 99 at S. Atlantic Street and S. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Way would increase traffic volumes locally. The increased traffic congestion could make it more difficult for vehicles to exit the St. Xxxxxx xx Xxxxxx Shelter. Overnight visitors at the shelter, however, are transported to and from the facility by an agency van from downtown Seattle. Access to the facility by clients would not change. The new travel patterns would not cause substantial adverse effects on the few residents living in the south section.
Population and Housing. The construction of the stacked tunnel alignment would result in acquisition of one building with a single apartment unit. Access to residential development and traffic patterns for the central section would be different from current conditions. Existing ramps at Columbia and Seneca Streets would not be replaced. As discussed above, the Xxxxxxx and Western Avenue ramps would be rebuilt. As described in the Draft EIS, the southbound off‐ and northbound on‐ramp to and from Western Avenue (Battery Street ramps) would be for emergency vehicle use only. Generally, traffic congestion and noise levels along the waterfront would decrease markedly, as much of the exiting viaduct traffic would be using the underground tunnel. Traffic would increase on surface streets in the north end of the central section as traffic exits to reach downtown destinations. Traffic volumes on Xxxxxxx and Western Avenues would increase above current levels because of the lack of ramps in the central downtown business district. Because existing noise levels are high, as found in all dense urban environments, increased noise would not be substantial. Vehicle and pedestrian access to the Bread of Life Mission and the Compass Center homeless shelters could improve due to the new SODO Ramps south of these facilities and reduced traffic volumes on Alaskan Way surface street in the immediate vicinity of these social service agencies. With no ramps at Pike Street, noise and traffic congestion would not likely degrade conditions for either pedestrians along the waterfront or residents of nearby waterfront condominium complexes. Community Facilities Numerous public and private educational institutions are generally located along the central section of the project corridor. General travel patterns would change due to the lack of downtown ramps. Travel routes and travel times to and from these community facilities would change, but not substantially.
Population and Housing. The changes in alternative design for this section of the project corridor substantially reduce the adverse effects on residents in the south portion of the north waterfront section, particularly those living in the Waterfront Landing condominium complex. The removal of the ramps at Pike Street would result in less traffic and lower noise levels, though this would not likely be perceived as a noticeable change considering existing high noise levels found in this dense urban environment. People would continue to be able to cross Alaskan Way surface street with relative ease and reach the waterfront in front of the condominium complex. Traffic patterns would be similar to current conditions. The Tunnel Alternative would not result in substantial adverse effects on population and housing.
