Performance Review for Criteria Architect Sample Clauses

Performance Review for Criteria Architect. The Judicial Council or its agent may evaluate Criteria Architect’s performance under this Agreement. Such evaluation may include assessing Criteria Architect’s compliance with all Agreement terms and performance standards. Any deficiencies in the Criteria Architect’s performance that the Judicial Council reasonably determines are severe or continuing and compromises the quality of Criteria Architect’s Work if not corrected, will be reported to the Criteria Architect’s principal. The report may include recommended improvements and corrective measures to be taken by the Criteria Architect. If the Criteria Architect’s performance remains unsatisfactory as determined by the Judicial Council in its sole discretion, the Judicial Council may, without limitation, terminate this Agreement for cause or impose other penalties as specified in this Agreement. Any evaluation of Criteria Architect’s performance conducted by the Judicial Council shall not be construed as an Acceptance of the Criteria Architect’s work product or methods of performance. Criteria Architect shall be solely responsible for the quality, completeness, and accuracy of the work product that Criteria Architect and its Sub-Consultants deliver under this Agreement. Criteria Architect shall not rely on Judicial Council to perform any quality control review of Criteria Architect’s work product, as such review shall be conducted by Criteria Architect.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (21)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Performance Review for Criteria Architect

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Performance Reports None Specified

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Performance Monitoring A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.